Impact of laparoscopic ultrasound during PIPAC directed treatment of unresectable peritoneal metastasis

被引:0
作者
Jorgensen, Magnus S. [1 ]
Ainsworth, Alan P. [1 ]
Fristrup, Claus W. [1 ]
Mortensen, Michael B. [1 ]
Graversen, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Odense Univ Hosp, Odense PIPAC Ctr, Dept Surg, Odense, Denmark
关键词
clinical impact; laparoscopic ultrasound; liver metastases; peritoneal metastasis; pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy; DIAGNOSTIC LAPAROSCOPY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; LIVER METASTASES; CHEMOTHERAPY; AEROSOL; CARCINOMATOSIS; PROGNOSIS; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1515/pp-2024-0007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives Laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) combines both laparoscopy and ultrasound imaging of the peritoneum liver and retroperitoneum. LUS has not been described in treatments with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). We present our experience with LUS in patients undergoing PIPAC.Methods Retrospective study of LUS findings from the prospective PIPAC-OPC2 trial. Main outcome was changes in overall treatment strategy due to LUS findings.Results PIPAC-OPC2 included 143 patients of which 33 patients were treated with electrostatic precipitation PIPAC. Nine patients were excluded due to primary non-access. During PIPAC 1, LUS was performed in 112 of 134 (84 %) PIPAC procedures and changed overall treatment strategy in one patient due to detection of multiple liver metastases unseen by baseline CT. During PIPAC 2 and 3 LUS was performed in 59 of 104 (57 %) and 42 of 78 (54 %) PIPAC procedures, respectively. Throughout PIPAC 1-3, LUS also detected pathological lymph nodes in 16 patients, and focal liver lesions in another four patients of uncertain origin. No further examinations were performed in these patients, and the overall treatment strategy was not changed according to the PIPAC-OPC2 protocol. One patient had a splenic capsule rupture related to the LUS itself. This was managed conservatively.Conclusions LUS may be safely performed during PIPAC. However, LUS has limited clinical impact in patients scheduled for PIPAC, and cannot be recommended as a routine procedure when performing PIPAC.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 112
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: rationale, evidence, and potential indications
    Alyami, Mohammad
    Hubner, Martin
    Grass, Fabian
    Bakrin, Naoual
    Villeneuve, Laurent
    Laplace, Nathalie
    Passot, Guillaume
    Glehen, Olivier
    Kepenekian, Vahan
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (07) : E368 - E377
  • [2] Coco Danilo, 2020, Maedica (Bucur), V15, P250, DOI 10.26574/maedica.2020.15.2.250
  • [3] 10 Years of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Di Giorgio, Andrea
    Macri, Antonio
    Ferracci, Federica
    Robella, Manuela
    Visaloco, Mario
    De Manzoni, Giovanni
    Sammartino, Paolo
    Sommariva, Antonio
    Biacchi, Daniele
    Roviello, Franco
    Pastorino, Roberta
    Pires Marafon, Denise
    Rotolo, Stefano
    Casella, Francesco
    Vaira, Marco
    [J]. CANCERS, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [4] The value of contrast-enhanced laparoscopic ultrasound during robotic-assisted surgery for primary colorectal cancer
    Ellebaek, Signe Bremholm
    Fristrup, Claus Wilki
    Pless, Torsten
    Poornoroozy, Peiman Hossein
    Andersen, Per Vadgaard
    Mahdi, Bassam
    Mortensen, Michael Bau
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2018, 46 (03) : 178 - 182
  • [5] Ellebk SB, 2017, ULTRASOUND INT OPEN, V3, pE60, DOI 10.1055/s-0043-100503
  • [6] Prognosis of patients with peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer given systemic therapy: an analysis of individual patient data from prospective randomised trials from the Analysis and Research in Cancers of the Digestive System (ARCAD) database
    Franko, Jan
    Shi, Qian
    Meyers, Jeffrey P.
    Maughan, Timothy S.
    Adams, Richard A.
    Seymour, Matthew T.
    Saltz, Leonard
    Punt, Cornelis J. A.
    Koopman, Miriam
    Tournigand, Christophe
    Tebbutt, Niall C.
    Diaz-Rubio, Eduardo
    Souglakos, John
    Falcone, Alfredo
    Chibaudel, Benoist
    Heinemann, Volker
    Moen, Joseph
    De Gramont, Aimery
    Sargent, Daniel J.
    Grothey, Axel
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (12) : 1709 - 1719
  • [7] Graversen M, 2023, ANN SURG ONCOL, V30, P2634, DOI 10.1245/s10434-022-13010-0
  • [8] Prospective, single-center implementation and response evaluation of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal metastasis
    Graversen, Martin
    Detlefsen, Sonke
    Bjerregaard, Jon Kroll
    Fristrup, Claus Wilki
    Pfeiffer, Per
    Mortensen, Michael Bau
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 10 : 1 - 11
  • [9] Levy Jordan, 2016, HPB Surg, V2016, P8092109, DOI 10.1155/2016/8092109
  • [10] A systematic review on quality of life (QoL) of patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) who underwent pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC)
    Li, Zhenyue
    Wong, Louis Choon Kit
    Sultana, Rehena
    Lim, Hui Jun
    Tan, Joey Wee-Shan
    Tan, Qiu Xuan
    Wong, Jolene Si Min
    Chia, Claramae Shulyn
    Ong, Chin-Ann Johnny
    [J]. PLEURA AND PERITONEUM, 2022, 7 (02) : 39 - 49