Comparing the imaging characteristics of middle-aged patients with multiple sclerosis and CADASIL: A retrospective cross-sectional study

Background: Few studies have quantitatively analyzed the imaging disparities between multiple sclerosis (MS) and cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). We aimed to compare the imaging characteristics of MS and CADASIL in middle-aged patients. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study used a single-center database and included patients aged 40-60 years with MS and CADASIL who underwent the designated imaging protocol including 3D T1-weighted imaging and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), diffusion tensor imaging and susceptibility-weighted imaging between January 2018 and March 2023. Patients with MRI-detected macrobleeds were excluded. Results: A total of 27 patients with MS (mean age, 46.7 years +/- 4.4, 8 men) and 30 patients with CADASIL (mean age, 51.6 years +/- 5.8, 14 men) were included. No significant differences were observed in the Fazekas grades of white matter lesions (WMLs). Patients with CADASIL exhibited greater external capsule involvement (56.7% vs.18.5 %; p = 0.006), whereas the MS group had more lesions in the corpus callosum (81.5% vs. 53.3 %, p = 0.02) and brainstem (74.1% vs. 46.7 %, p = 0.04). The CADASIL group exhibited a higher incidence of microbleeds (12.07 vs. 0.11, p = 0.001). The WMLs in the MS group exhibited a lower T1 lesion/cerebrospinal fluid signal index (2.206 vs. 2.882, p < 0.001). A value of <= 2.57 demonstrated a sensitivity of 92.6 % and a specificity of 90.0 % in differentiating MS. Patients with MS had a thinner corpus callosum (7.18 mm vs 7.86 mm, p = 0.04), while patients with CADASIL showed significantly higher mean diffusivity (0.8776 x 10(-3) vs. 0.7637 x 10(-3) mm2/s, p = 0.03) and lower fractional anisotropy (0.7581 vs. 0.8389, p = 0.04) in the splenium of the corpus callosum. Conclusion: Middle-aged patients with MS and CADASIL showed comparable Fazekas grades for WMLs. However, lesion distribution, T1 signal characteristics, and splenic diffusivity changes can help differentiate between MS and CADASIL.