Improved ORB Algorithm Through Feature Point Optimization and Gaussian Pyramid

被引:0
作者
Borman, Rohmat Indra [1 ,2 ]
Harjoko, Agus [2 ]
Wahyono [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknokrat Indonesia, Fac Engn & Comp Sci, Lampung, Indonesia
[2] Univ Gadjah Mada, Dept Comp Sci & Elect, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
关键词
-Feature point; Gaussian pyramid; image matching; ORB algorithm; scale invariance;
D O I
10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0150228
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Feature points obtained using traditional ORB methods often exhibit redundancy, uneven distribution, and lack scale invariance. This study enhances the traditional ORB algorithm by presenting an optimal technique for extracting feature points, thereby overcoming these challenges. Initially, the image is partitioned into several areas. The determination of the quantity of feature points to be extracted from each region takes into account both the overall number of feature points and the number of divisions that the image undergoes. This method tackles concerns related to the overlap and redundancy of feature points in the extraction process. To counteract the non- scale invariance issue in feature points obtained via the ORB method, a Gaussian pyramid is employed, and feature points are extracted at each level. Experimental findings demonstrate that our method successfully extracts feature points s with greater uniformity and rationality, while preserving image matching accuracy. Specifically, our technique outperforms the traditional ORB algorithm by approximately 4% and the SURF algorithm by 2% in terms of matching performance. Additionally, the processing time of our proposed algorithm is three times faster than that of the SURF algorithm and twelve times faster than the SIFT algorithm.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 275
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [21] Multi-feature extraction method based on Gaussian pyramid and weighted voting for hyperspectral image classification
    Yin, Bin
    Cui, Binge
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING (ICCECE), 2021, : 645 - 648
  • [22] Improved matching point purification algorithm mRANSAC
    Wang, Yawei
    Xu, Tingfa
    Wang, Jihui
    Dongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 43 (SUPPL.I): : 163 - 167
  • [23] Point Sets Matching by Feature-Aware Mixture Point Matching Algorithm
    Sun, Kun
    Li, Peiran
    Tao, Wenbing
    Liu, Liman
    ENERGY MINIMIZATION METHODS IN COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION, EMMCVPR 2015, 2015, 8932 : 392 - 405
  • [24] Dense Feature Matching Based on Improved DFM Algorithm
    Zhang Yanhan
    Zhang Yinxin
    Huang Zhanhua
    Wang Kangnian
    LASER & OPTOELECTRONICS PROGRESS, 2024, 61 (08)
  • [25] Image feature point matching method based on improved BRISK
    Shi Q.
    Liu Y.
    Xu Y.
    International Journal of Wireless and Mobile Computing, 2021, 20 (02) : 132 - 138
  • [26] An Improved Wood Identification Accuracy Using Gaussian Pyramid and Laplacian Edge Detection Based on Android Smartphone
    Sugiarto, Bambang
    Arifin, Muhammad Rosyid
    Laluma, Riffa Haviani
    Prakasa, Esa
    Gunawansyah
    Azwar, Ade Geovania
    PROCEEDING OF 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, SERVICES, AND APPLICATIONS (TSSA), 2020,
  • [27] Application of Improved KAZE Algorithm in Image Feature Extraction and Matching
    Zhang, Peipei
    Yan, Xin'e
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 122625 - 122637
  • [28] An Improved Image Mosaic Algorithm based on Feature Points Matching
    Li, Yufeng
    Gu, Shaohu
    Liu, Fei
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS AND TECHNOLOGY: OPTOELECTRONIC IMAGING AND PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 9045
  • [29] Image matching algorithm based on improved AKAZE and Gaussian mixture model
    Tang, Qingling
    Wang, Xuanxi
    Zhang, Meng
    Wu, Chunhong
    Jiang, Xiaofei
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC IMAGING, 2023, 32 (02)
  • [30] Study on image feature point extraction algorithm and stereo matching technique
    Zhang L.
    Cao A.
    Du Y.
    Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 2016, 13 (05) : 2938 - 2944