Mitigating calcar fracture risk with automated impaction during total hip arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Gordon, Dan [1 ]
Cardenas, Justin M. [2 ]
Fawley, David [3 ]
Kitziger, Kurt J. [2 ]
Gladnick, Brian P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped, 3500 Gaston Ave,6th Floor Hoblitzelle, Dallas, TX 75246 USA
[2] WB Carrell Mem Clin, Adult Hip & Knee Reconstruct, 9301 N Cent Expressway,Tower I,Suite 400, Dallas, TX 75231 USA
[3] DePuy Synth, Clin Res, 700 Orthoped Dr, Warsaw, IN 46582 USA
关键词
Automated impaction; Cementless femoral stem; Direct anterior approach; Hip arthroplasty; Periprosthetic fracture; Surgical automation; PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES; DESIGN; FEMUR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jor.2024.08.002
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Automated broaching has recently been introduced for total hip arthroplasty (THA), with the goal of improving surgical efficiency and reducing surgeon workload. While studies have suggested that this technique may improve femoral sizing and alignment, little has been published regarding its safety, particularly with regard to calcar fractures. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the risk of calcar fracture during automated broaching, and to determine if this risk can be mitigated. Methods: We queried our prospective institutional database and identified 1596 unilateral THAs performed by the senior author using automated impaction between 2019 and 2023. We identified the incidence of calcar fracture with automated impaction, and whether the fracture occurred during broaching or stem insertion. We additionally determined calcar fracture incidence within two consecutive subgroups of patients using different stem insertion techniques; subgroup (1): automated broaching with automated stem insertion for all patients; versus subgroup (2): automated broaching with automated stem insertion ONLY if a cushion of cancellous bone separated the broach from the calcar, otherwise the stem was placed manually. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed with Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test, respectively. Results: Seventeen calcar fractures occurred intraoperatively (1.1 %). Only two fractures occurred during automated broaching (0.1 %), while fifteen occurred during final stem impaction (0.9 %) (p = 0.007). Four calcar fractures (1.4 %) occurred in subgroup 1, compared to two in subgroup 2 (0.6 %) (p = 0.28). Conclusions: Our study found a calcar fracture incidence of 1.1 % using automated impaction, consistent with historically reported rates of 0.4-3.7 %. We found that calcar fractures are more likely to occur during stem insertion than during femoral broaching. We recommend that if any part of the final broach is in direct contact with the calcar, the final stem should be impacted manually to minimize fracture risk.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 67
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fracture of a ceramic liner in a total hip arthroplasty with a sandwich cup
    Popescu, Dragos
    Gallart, X.
    Garcia, S.
    Bori, G.
    Tomas, X.
    Riba, J.
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2008, 128 (08) : 783 - 785
  • [32] Risk of Periprosthetic Fractures With Direct Anterior Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Berend, Keith R.
    Mirza, Amer J.
    Morris, Michael J.
    Lombardi, Adolph V., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (10): : 2295 - 2298
  • [33] Results of Wagner SL revision stem with impaction bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty
    Singh, Somesh P.
    Bhalodiya, Haresh P.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 47 (04) : 357 - 363
  • [34] Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty, Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty, or Total Hip Arthroplasty for Hip Fracture in Older Individuals
    Okike, Kanu
    Prentice, Heather A.
    Chan, Priscilla H.
    Fasig, Brian H.
    Paxton, Elizabeth W.
    Bernstein, Joseph
    Ahn, Jaimo
    Chen, Foster
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2024, 106 (02): : 120 - 128
  • [35] Total Hip Arthroplasty for Hip Fracture: Clinical Results and Mid-Term Survivorship
    Gill, James R.
    Pathan, Aly
    Parsons, Samuel J.
    Wronka, Konrad
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (12)
  • [36] Femoral Impaction Grafting in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty A Follow-Up of 540 Hips
    Lamberton, Tony D.
    Kenny, Paddy J.
    Whitehouse, Sarah L.
    Timperley, A. John
    Gie, Graham A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (08): : 1154 - 1160
  • [37] Stability differentials for proximal vs distal fusion of total hip arthroplasty femoral impaction grafts
    Heiner, Anneliese D.
    Callaghan, John J.
    Brown, Thomas D.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2008, 23 (06): : 921 - 926
  • [38] Risk factor analysis on perioperative greater trochanteric fracture of total hip arthroplasty via anterolateral approach
    Inoue, Daisuke
    Kabata, Tamon
    Kajino, Yoshitomo
    Ohmori, Takaaki
    Yamamuro, Yuki
    Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (07) : 4519 - 4525
  • [39] Risk Factors for Femoral Fracture after Canine Press-Fit Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Ganz, Seth Mathus
    Jackson, Joshua
    VanEnkevort, Bruce
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2010, 39 (06) : 688 - 695
  • [40] Use of an Automated Surgical Impactor Reduces Femoral Broaching Time in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty: Results From a Randomized, Multicenter Study
    Thomason, Henry Clayton
    Redmond, John
    Morrison, J. Craig
    Fawley, David
    Bernard, Thierry
    Gladnick, Brian P.
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2024, 28