Mitigating calcar fracture risk with automated impaction during total hip arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Gordon, Dan [1 ]
Cardenas, Justin M. [2 ]
Fawley, David [3 ]
Kitziger, Kurt J. [2 ]
Gladnick, Brian P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped, 3500 Gaston Ave,6th Floor Hoblitzelle, Dallas, TX 75246 USA
[2] WB Carrell Mem Clin, Adult Hip & Knee Reconstruct, 9301 N Cent Expressway,Tower I,Suite 400, Dallas, TX 75231 USA
[3] DePuy Synth, Clin Res, 700 Orthoped Dr, Warsaw, IN 46582 USA
关键词
Automated impaction; Cementless femoral stem; Direct anterior approach; Hip arthroplasty; Periprosthetic fracture; Surgical automation; PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES; DESIGN; FEMUR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jor.2024.08.002
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Automated broaching has recently been introduced for total hip arthroplasty (THA), with the goal of improving surgical efficiency and reducing surgeon workload. While studies have suggested that this technique may improve femoral sizing and alignment, little has been published regarding its safety, particularly with regard to calcar fractures. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the risk of calcar fracture during automated broaching, and to determine if this risk can be mitigated. Methods: We queried our prospective institutional database and identified 1596 unilateral THAs performed by the senior author using automated impaction between 2019 and 2023. We identified the incidence of calcar fracture with automated impaction, and whether the fracture occurred during broaching or stem insertion. We additionally determined calcar fracture incidence within two consecutive subgroups of patients using different stem insertion techniques; subgroup (1): automated broaching with automated stem insertion for all patients; versus subgroup (2): automated broaching with automated stem insertion ONLY if a cushion of cancellous bone separated the broach from the calcar, otherwise the stem was placed manually. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed with Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test, respectively. Results: Seventeen calcar fractures occurred intraoperatively (1.1 %). Only two fractures occurred during automated broaching (0.1 %), while fifteen occurred during final stem impaction (0.9 %) (p = 0.007). Four calcar fractures (1.4 %) occurred in subgroup 1, compared to two in subgroup 2 (0.6 %) (p = 0.28). Conclusions: Our study found a calcar fracture incidence of 1.1 % using automated impaction, consistent with historically reported rates of 0.4-3.7 %. We found that calcar fractures are more likely to occur during stem insertion than during femoral broaching. We recommend that if any part of the final broach is in direct contact with the calcar, the final stem should be impacted manually to minimize fracture risk.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 67
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robot-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty is Associated With an Increased Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture
    Singh, Aaron
    Kotzur, Travis
    Peng, Lindsey
    Emukah, Chimobi
    Buttacavoli, Frank
    Moore, Chance
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (09): : S353 - S358
  • [22] Total hip arthroplasty after treatment of acetabular fracture
    Glas, PY
    Béjui-Hugues, J
    Carret, JP
    REVUE DE CHIRURGIE ORTHOPEDIQUE ET REPARATRICE DE L APPAREIL MOTEUR, 2005, 91 (02): : 124 - 131
  • [23] Uncemented total hip arthroplasty; increased risk of early periprosthetic fracture requiring revision surgery in elderly females
    Hopman, S. R.
    de Windt, T. S.
    van Erp, J. H. J.
    Bekkers, J. E. J.
    de Gast, A.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 25 : 40 - 44
  • [24] Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture: What Are the Contemporary Reasons for Failure?
    Gausden, Elizabeth B.
    Cross, William W.
    Mabry, Tad M.
    Pagnano, Mark W.
    Berry, Daniel J.
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (07): : S272 - S276
  • [25] Does Preoperative Bisphosphonate Use Impact the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture Following Total Hip Arthroplasty?
    Torres, Rodnell Busigo
    Hong, James
    Kodali, Hanish
    Poeran, Jashvant
    Stern, Brocha Z.
    Hayden, Brett L.
    Chen, Darwin D.
    Moucha, Calin S.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2025, 40 (03):
  • [26] Does Femoral Morphology Predict the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty?
    Bigart, Kevin C.
    Nahhas, Cindy R.
    Ruzich, Gregory P.
    Culvern, Chris N.
    Salzano, Michael B.
    Della Valle, Craig J.
    Nam, Denis
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (06): : S359 - S363
  • [27] Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture in Non-cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach
    Berliner, Zachary
    Yau, Cameron
    Jahng, Kenneth
    Bas, Marcel A.
    Cooper, H. John
    Rodriguez, Jose A.
    HSS JOURNAL, 2022, 18 (03) : 368 - 375
  • [28] Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty
    Lindahl, Hans
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2007, 38 (06): : 651 - 654
  • [29] Fracture of a ceramic liner in a total hip arthroplasty with a sandwich cup
    Dragos Popescu
    X. Gallart
    S. Garcia
    G. Bori
    X. Tomas
    J. Riba
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2008, 128 : 783 - 785
  • [30] Total Hip Arthroplasty in fracture neck of femur: A review of the literature
    Ahmed, H. E.
    Al-dadah, O.
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2023, 89 (01): : 29 - 36