Mitigating calcar fracture risk with automated impaction during total hip arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Gordon, Dan [1 ]
Cardenas, Justin M. [2 ]
Fawley, David [3 ]
Kitziger, Kurt J. [2 ]
Gladnick, Brian P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped, 3500 Gaston Ave,6th Floor Hoblitzelle, Dallas, TX 75246 USA
[2] WB Carrell Mem Clin, Adult Hip & Knee Reconstruct, 9301 N Cent Expressway,Tower I,Suite 400, Dallas, TX 75231 USA
[3] DePuy Synth, Clin Res, 700 Orthoped Dr, Warsaw, IN 46582 USA
关键词
Automated impaction; Cementless femoral stem; Direct anterior approach; Hip arthroplasty; Periprosthetic fracture; Surgical automation; PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES; DESIGN; FEMUR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jor.2024.08.002
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Automated broaching has recently been introduced for total hip arthroplasty (THA), with the goal of improving surgical efficiency and reducing surgeon workload. While studies have suggested that this technique may improve femoral sizing and alignment, little has been published regarding its safety, particularly with regard to calcar fractures. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the risk of calcar fracture during automated broaching, and to determine if this risk can be mitigated. Methods: We queried our prospective institutional database and identified 1596 unilateral THAs performed by the senior author using automated impaction between 2019 and 2023. We identified the incidence of calcar fracture with automated impaction, and whether the fracture occurred during broaching or stem insertion. We additionally determined calcar fracture incidence within two consecutive subgroups of patients using different stem insertion techniques; subgroup (1): automated broaching with automated stem insertion for all patients; versus subgroup (2): automated broaching with automated stem insertion ONLY if a cushion of cancellous bone separated the broach from the calcar, otherwise the stem was placed manually. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed with Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test, respectively. Results: Seventeen calcar fractures occurred intraoperatively (1.1 %). Only two fractures occurred during automated broaching (0.1 %), while fifteen occurred during final stem impaction (0.9 %) (p = 0.007). Four calcar fractures (1.4 %) occurred in subgroup 1, compared to two in subgroup 2 (0.6 %) (p = 0.28). Conclusions: Our study found a calcar fracture incidence of 1.1 % using automated impaction, consistent with historically reported rates of 0.4-3.7 %. We found that calcar fractures are more likely to occur during stem insertion than during femoral broaching. We recommend that if any part of the final broach is in direct contact with the calcar, the final stem should be impacted manually to minimize fracture risk.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 67
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk factors for intraoperative calcar fracture in cementless total hip arthroplasty
    Miettinen, Simo S. A.
    Makinen, Tatu J.
    Kostensalo, Inari
    Mekela, Keijo
    Huhtala, Heini
    Kettunen, Jukka S.
    Remes, Ville
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2016, 87 (02) : 113 - 119
  • [2] Low Risk of Fracture Using a Cementless Triple-Tapered Collared Femoral Stem With Automated Impaction in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Osondu, Chukwuemeka U.
    Fernandez, Carlos A.
    Hernandez, Yvette E.
    Paraliticci, Giovanni U.
    van der Ven, Alexander
    Lawrie, Charles M.
    Suarez, Juan C.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (04): : 1001 - 1006
  • [3] Outcomes Following Intraoperative Calcar Fractures During Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Wilson, Eric J.
    Strait, Alexander, V
    Fricka, Kevin B.
    Hamilton, William G.
    Sershon, Robert A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (09): : S464 - S468
  • [4] Does Automated Impaction Improve Femoral Component Sizing and Alignment in Total Hip Arthroplasty?
    Thalody, Hope S.
    Post, Zachary D.
    Bridges, Tiffany N.
    Qadiri, Qudratullah S.
    Scaramella, Amira
    Ong, Alvin C.
    Ponzio, Danielle Y.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (10): : 2154 - 2158
  • [5] Quantitative characterisation of impaction events during femoral broaching in total hip arthroplasty
    Preutenborbeck, Martin
    Reuter, Julian
    Ferrari, Elisabetta
    MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2020, 76 : 13 - 19
  • [6] Total hip arthroplasty reduces the risk of dislocation after femoral neck fracture
    Pangaud, Corentin
    Pioger, Charles
    Pauly, Vanessa
    Orleans, Veronica
    Boyer, Laurent
    Argenson, Jean Noel
    Ollivier, Matthieu
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2023, 109 (04)
  • [7] An in vitro model of impaction during hip arthroplasty
    Doyle, Ruben
    Boughton, Oliver
    Plant, Daniel
    Desoutter, George
    Cobb, Justin P.
    Jeffers, Jonathan R. T.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2019, 82 : 220 - 227
  • [8] Osteopetrosis is Associated With an Increased Risk for Intraoperative Periprosthetic Fracture in Total Hip Arthroplasty but not in Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Burke, John F.
    Quinlan, Nicole D.
    Werner, Brian C.
    Barnes, C. Lowry
    Browne, James A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (01): : 24 - 29
  • [9] Impaction bone grafting for periprosthetic fractures around a total hip arthroplasty
    Youssef, Bishoy
    Pavlou, George
    Shah, Nikhil
    Macheras, George
    Tsiridis, Eleftherios
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2014, 45 (11): : 1674 - 1680
  • [10] Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular hip fracture
    Judge, A.
    Metcalfe, D.
    Whitehouse, M. R.
    Parsons, N.
    Costa, M.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2020, 102B (06): : 658 - 660