Feasibility and Efficacy of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Gastric Cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Abate, Miseker [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Drebin, Harrison [1 ,2 ]
Shimada, Shoji [1 ,2 ]
Fei, Teng [4 ]
Mckinley, Sophia [1 ,5 ]
Poruk, Katherine [5 ]
Ferguson, Ben [5 ]
Neuwirth, Madalyn [5 ]
Tang, Laura H. [6 ]
Vardhana, Santosha [2 ]
Strong, Vivian E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Gastr & Mixed Tumor Serv, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Human Oncol & Pathogenesis Program, New York, NY USA
[3] New York Presbyterian Hosp, Weill Cornell Med, Dept Surg, New York, NY USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY USA
[5] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY USA
[6] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, New York, NY USA
关键词
Sentinel lymph node mapping; Draining lymph node metastasis; Diagnostic accuracy; Lymphadenectomy; BREAST-CANCER; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; AXILLARY DISSECTION; BIOPSY; METASTASIS; GASTRECTOMY;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-024-15642-w
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Lymph node metastasis is a critical prognostic factor for patients with gastric carcinoma (GC). Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has the potential to identify the initial site of draining lymph node metastasis and reduce the extent of surgical lymphadenectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of SLN mapping in GC. Methods The study enrolled 129 GC patients undergoing total or partial gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and indocyanine green fluorescence-guided SLN mapping. The primary outcomes were the negative predictive value (NPV) and sensitivity of SLN mapping. The secondary outcomes were clinicopathologic factors associated with SLN mapping accuracy and successful SLN mapping. Results The SLN detection rate in this study was 86.8 %. The study had an overall NPV of 83.1 % and an overall sensitivity of 65.8 %. The NPV was found to be significantly higher in the patients with no lymphovascular invasion (LVI) than in those with LVI (96.0 % vs 59.3 %; p < 0.001) and in the patients whose pathologic T (pT) stage lower than 3 than in those whose T stage was 3 or higher (92.0 % vs 66.7 %; p = 0.009). The sensitivity of SLN mapping was 50 % in the patients with no LVI and 33 % in the patients with a pT stage lower than 3. Conclusion The study results showed that for patients with early-stage GC with no LVI, negative SLN findings may represent a potential additive predictor indicating the absence of regional LN metastasis. However, given the low sensitivity rates noted, further research is needed to identify specific patient populations that may benefit from SLN mapping in GC.
引用
收藏
页码:6959 / 6969
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy and feasibility of the immunomagnetic separation based diagnosis for detecting sentinel lymph node metastasis from breast cancer
    Zhi, Xiang-Cheng
    Zhang, Min
    Meng, Ting-Ting
    Zhang, Xiao-Bei
    Shi, Zhen-Dong
    Liu, Yan
    Liu, Jing-Jing
    Zhang, Sheng
    Zhang, Jin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NANOMEDICINE, 2015, 10 : 2775 - 2784
  • [22] Feasibility of sentinel node concept in gastric carcinoma: Clinicopathological analysis of gastric cancer with solitary lymph node metastases
    Moenig, SP
    Luebke, T
    Baldus, SE
    Schroeder, W
    Bollschweiler, E
    Schneider, PM
    Hoelscher, AH
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 25 (2B) : 1349 - 1352
  • [23] Predicting Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Involvement: Evaluation of Two Scoring Systems
    Sanjuan, Alex
    Escaramis, Georgia
    Vidal-Sicart, Sergi
    Illa, Miriam
    Zanon, Gabriel
    Pahisa, Jaume
    Rubi, Sebastia
    Velasco, Martin
    Santamaria, Gorane
    Farrus, Blanca
    Munoz, Montse
    Garcia, Yolanda
    Luis Fernandez, Pedro
    Pons, Francesca
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2010, 16 (02): : 134 - 140
  • [24] Feasibility study of sentinel lymph node of prostate cancer by laparoscopy: First results
    Mouaden, A.
    Pallardy, A.
    Rousseau, T.
    Lacoste, J.
    Campion, L.
    Testard, A.
    Aillet, G.
    Bridji, B.
    Curtet, C.
    Kraeber-Bodere, F.
    Rousseau, C.
    MEDECINE NUCLEAIRE-IMAGERIE FONCTIONNELLE ET METABOLIQUE, 2011, 35 (09): : 461 - 469
  • [25] Sentinel lymph node mapping in colorectal cancer
    Bara, T., Jr.
    Bara, T.
    Bancu, S.
    Egyed, I. Zs.
    Gurzu, S.
    Bancu, L.
    Azamfirei, L.
    Feher, A-M
    CHIRURGIA, 2011, 106 (02) : 195 - 198
  • [26] Sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer
    Cody III H.S.
    Breast Cancer, 1999, 6 (1) : 13 - 22
  • [27] SENTINEL LYMPH NODE NAVIGATION IN GASTRIC CANCER
    Hosseininejad, S. M.
    Fazel, A.
    Roshandel, G.
    Khandouzi, M. R.
    Norouzi, M. S.
    WORLD CANCER RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2018, 5 (04)
  • [28] Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Gastric Cancer
    Takeuchi, Hiroya
    Kitagawa, Yuko
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2015, 21 (01): : 21 - 24
  • [29] A feasibility study of sentinel lymph node mapping by cervical injection of a tracer in Japanese women with early stage endometrial cancer
    Shimada, Chisa
    Todo, Yukiharu
    Yamazaki, Hiroyuki
    Takeshita, Sho
    Okamoto, Kazuhira
    Minobe, Shinichiro
    Yamashiro, Katsushige
    Kato, Hidenori
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 57 (04): : 541 - 545
  • [30] Sentinel lymph node mapping for grade 1 endometrial cancer: Is it the answer to the surgical staging dilemma?
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    Khoury-Collado, Fady
    Pandit-Taskar, Neeta
    Soslow, Robert A.
    Dao, Fanny
    Sonoda, Yukio
    Levine, Douglas A.
    Brown, Carol L.
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Barakat, Richard R.
    Gemignani, Mary L.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 113 (02) : 163 - 169