Increasing Demand for Fact-Checking

被引:0
作者
Graham, Matthew H. [1 ]
Porter, Ethan V. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Dept Polit Sci, 1801 N Broad St, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Sch Media & Publ Affairs, Washington, DC USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Fact-checking; misinformation; experiments; partisanship; SOCIAL PRESSURE; NEWS; IDENTITY; MISINFORMATION; INCENTIVES; MESSAGES; STORIES;
D O I
10.1080/10584609.2024.2395859
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Fact-checks successfully persuade people to reject misinformation, but people who are exposed to misinformation rarely read fact-checks. This makes increasing the demand for fact-checking a crucial, understudied aspect of the fight against misinformation. We test several ways of increasing demand for fact-checking. In our first two studies, we find little evidence that the partisan reputation of fact-checkers affects willingness to read fact-checks. Our third and fourth studies yield three successful classes of interventions: appeals to civic duty, social pressure, and micro-payments. Effects are robust among those who are least likely at baseline to choose to read fact-checks, and among those who are most likely at baseline to consume misinformation. Our results offer several practical lessons. Increasing demand for fact-checks is possible, including among the subgroups most in need of encouragement. Though fact-checkers are widely perceived as partisan, increasing demand may require looking beyond partisan reputations and identities.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 348
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Who Uses Fact-Checking Sites? The Impact of Demographics, Political Antecedents, and Media Use on Fact-Checking Site Awareness, Attitudes, and Behavior
    Robertson, Craig T.
    Mourao, Rachel R.
    Thorson, Esther
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESS-POLITICS, 2020, 25 (02) : 217 - 237
  • [42] The Community Notes Observatory: Can Crowdsourced Fact-Checking be Trusted in Practice?
    Righes, Luca
    Saeed, Mohammed
    Demartini, Gianluca
    Papotti, Paolo
    COMPANION OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB CONFERENCE, WWW 2023, 2023, : 172 - 175
  • [43] Fact-checking in TikTok. Communication and narrative forms to combat misinformation
    Sidorenko Bautista, Pavel
    Alonso-Lopez, Nadia
    Giacomelli, Fabio
    REVISTA LATINA DE COMUNICACION SOCIAL, 2021, 79 : 87 - +
  • [44] Characterizing The Impact Of Fact-Checking On The COVID-19 Misinformation Combat
    Pereira, Cefas Garcia
    Marques-Neto, Humberto Torres
    37TH ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED COMPUTING, 2022, : 1789 - 1796
  • [45] The Effect of Fact-Checking on Elites: A Field Experiment on US State Legislators
    Nyhan, Brendan
    Reifler, Jason
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 59 (03) : 628 - 640
  • [46] Fact-Checking the Crisis: COVID-19, Infodemics, and the Platformization of Truth
    Cotter, Kelley
    DeCook, Julia R.
    Kanthawala, Shaheen
    SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY, 2022, 8 (01):
  • [47] SciClops: Detecting and Contextualizing Scientific Claims for Assisting Manual Fact-Checking
    Smeros, Panayiotis
    Castillo, Carlos
    Aberer, Karl
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 30TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION & KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, CIKM 2021, 2021, : 1692 - 1702
  • [48] Fact-Checking Practices by Canadian Adults During an Era of Misinformation and Disinformation
    Cucinelli, Giuliana
    Farhan, Leelan
    GLOBAL MEDIA JOURNAL-CANADIAN EDITION, 2022, 14 (01): : 119 - 142
  • [49] Transparency and fact-checking in open societies
    Dierickx, Laurence
    Linden, Carl-Gustav
    JOURNALISM, 2024,
  • [50] Political Fact-Checking on Twitter: When Do Corrections Have an Effect?
    Margolin, Drew B.
    Hannak, Aniko
    Weber, Ingmar
    POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 2018, 35 (02) : 196 - 219