Increasing Demand for Fact-Checking

被引:2
作者
Graham, Matthew H. [1 ]
Porter, Ethan V. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Dept Polit Sci, 1801 N Broad St, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Sch Media & Publ Affairs, Washington, DC USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Fact-checking; misinformation; experiments; partisanship; SOCIAL PRESSURE; NEWS; IDENTITY; MISINFORMATION; INCENTIVES; MESSAGES; STORIES;
D O I
10.1080/10584609.2024.2395859
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Fact-checks successfully persuade people to reject misinformation, but people who are exposed to misinformation rarely read fact-checks. This makes increasing the demand for fact-checking a crucial, understudied aspect of the fight against misinformation. We test several ways of increasing demand for fact-checking. In our first two studies, we find little evidence that the partisan reputation of fact-checkers affects willingness to read fact-checks. Our third and fourth studies yield three successful classes of interventions: appeals to civic duty, social pressure, and micro-payments. Effects are robust among those who are least likely at baseline to choose to read fact-checks, and among those who are most likely at baseline to consume misinformation. Our results offer several practical lessons. Increasing demand for fact-checks is possible, including among the subgroups most in need of encouragement. Though fact-checkers are widely perceived as partisan, increasing demand may require looking beyond partisan reputations and identities.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 348
页数:24
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Journalistic interventions: The structural factors affecting the global emergence of fact-checking [J].
Amazeen, Michelle A. .
JOURNALISM, 2020, 21 (01) :95-111
[2]   Correcting Political and Consumer Misperceptions: The Effectiveness and Effects of Rating Scale Versus Contextual Correction Formats [J].
Amazeen, Michelle A. ;
Thorson, Emily ;
Muddiman, Ashley ;
Graves, Lucas .
JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2018, 95 (01) :28-48
[3]   True Motives: Prosocial and Instrumental Justifications for Behavioral Change in Organizations [J].
Amengual, Matthew ;
Apfelbaum, Evan P. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2021, 67 (08) :5032-5051
[4]  
Arechar A. A., 2023, UNDERSTANDING COMBAT
[5]   Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk [J].
Berinsky, Adam J. ;
Huber, Gregory A. ;
Lenz, Gabriel S. .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 20 (03) :351-368
[6]   Civic Duty and Voter Turnout [J].
Blais, Andre ;
Achen, Christopher H. .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2019, 41 (02) :473-497
[7]  
Board E., 2021, FACT CHECKING FACT C
[8]  
Bode L., 2021, J Quantitative Description: Digital Media, P1, DOI [10.51685/jqd.2021.016, DOI 10.51685/JQD.2021.016, https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2021.016]
[9]   In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation Through Related Stories Functionality in Social Media [J].
Bode, Leticia ;
Vraga, Emily K. .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2015, 65 (04) :619-638
[10]   Real Solutions for Fake News? Measuring the Effectiveness of General Warnings and Fact-Check Tags in Reducing Belief in False Stories on Social Media [J].
Clayton, Katherine ;
Blair, Spencer ;
Busam, Jonathan A. ;
Forstner, Samuel ;
Glance, John ;
Green, Guy ;
Kawata, Anna ;
Kovvuri, Akhila ;
Martin, Jonathan ;
Morgan, Evan ;
Sandhu, Morgan ;
Sang, Rachel ;
Scholz-Bright, Rachel ;
Welch, Austin T. ;
Wolff, Andrew G. ;
Zhou, Amanda ;
Nyhan, Brendan .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2020, 42 (04) :1073-1095