Assessing low-cost sensor for characterizing temporal variation of PM2.5 in Bandung, Indonesia

被引:1
作者
Kurniawati, Syukria [1 ]
Santoso, Muhayatun [1 ]
Nurhaini, Feni Fernita [1 ]
Atmodjo, Djoko Prakoso D. [1 ]
Lestiani, Diah Dwiana [1 ]
Ramadhani, Moch Faizal [1 ]
Kusmartini, Indah [1 ]
Syahfitri, Woro Yatu N. [1 ]
Damastuti, Endah [1 ]
Tursinah, Rasito [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy BRIN, Res Org Nucl Energy ORTN, Jl Tamansari 71, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia
关键词
Low-cost sensor; PurpleAir; SuperSASS; Temporal variation; PM2.5; PARTICULATE MATTER; URBAN; POLLUTION; PURPLEAIR;
D O I
10.1016/j.kjs.2024.100297
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is a concern due to its health effects, necessitating critical monitoring for both quantity and variability. Utilizing low-cost sensors to track PM2.5 is essential to augment other monitoring instruments, which are effective in generating temporal and spatial data. Therefore, in this study, we employed the low-cost PurpleAir (low-cost PA-II) to characterize the seasonal and diurnal variation of PM2.5 in Bandung, Indonesia, representing the densely populated metropolitan area of Bandung. During the sampling period from June 2022 to May 2023, co-location sampling with the filter-based Super Speciation Air Sampling System (SuperSASS) was employed to assess the low-cost PA-II. The PM2.5 data collected by the low-cost PA-II were compared to the SuperSASS data. The annual average mass concentration of PM2.5 measured by SuperSASS and the low-cost sensor was 31.51 +/- 15.53 mu g/m3 and 39.04 +/- 15.16 mu g/m3, respectively, surpassing the Indonesian government's regulation limit for an annual average of 15 mu g/m3. The comparative results of the two methods were obtained with R2 = 0.96, and low-cost PA-II data was 1.24 higher than SuperSASS. The difference may be attributed to several factors, including differences in sensor technology, calibration, location, and data processing. The seasonal variation indicated an increase in concentration during the dry season and a decrease during the wet season. The diurnal pattern indicates the morning peak between 06:00 and 08:00 during the rush hour, as well as the evening peak between 18:00 and 23:00, attributed to low temperatures and stagnant conditions. The diurnal pattern of PM2.5, which often exhibits the lowest peak at midday, is influenced by a combination of meteorological, atmospheric, and human activity factors. The findings suggested that the utilization of low-cost PA-II for a broader spatial scope is promising for real-time monitoring of PM2.5, to increase air pollution awareness in society.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Calibration of low-cost PurpleAir outdoor monitors using an improved method of calculating PM2.5
    Wallace, Lance
    Bi, Jianzhao
    Ott, Wayne R.
    Sarnat, Jeremy
    Liu, Yang
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 256
  • [32] Evaluation of new low-cost particle monitors for PM2.5 concentrations measurements
    Zikova, Nadezda
    Hopke, Philip K.
    Ferro, Andrea R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 2017, 105 : 24 - 34
  • [33] Analysis of Surface Level PM2.5 Measured by Low-Cost Sensor and Satellite-Based Column Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) over Kathmandu
    Regmi, Jeevan
    Poudyal, Khem N.
    Pokhrel, Amod
    Malakar, Nabin
    Gyawali, Madhu
    Tripathee, Lekhendra
    Rai, Mukesh
    Ramachandran, Srikanthan
    Wilson, Katrina
    Aryal, Rudra
    [J]. AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [34] Utilizing Low-cost Mobile Monitoring to Estimate the PM2.5 Inhaled Dose in Urban Environment
    Munir, Muhammad Miftahul
    Adrian, Martin
    Saputra, Casmika
    Lestari, Puji
    [J]. AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (06)
  • [35] Incorporating Low-Cost Sensor Measurements into High-Resolution PM2.5 Modeling at a Large Spatial Scale
    Bi, Jianzhao
    Wildani, Avani
    Chang, Howard H.
    Liu, Yang
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 (04) : 2152 - 2162
  • [36] Performance Assessment of a Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensor for a near Four-Month Period in Oslo, Norway
    Liu, Hai-Ying
    Schneider, Philipp
    Haugen, Rolf
    Vogt, Matthias
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2019, 10 (02):
  • [37] Real-Time Low-Cost Personal Monitoring for Exposure to PM2.5 among Asthmatic Children: Opportunities and Challenges
    Kim, Dohyeong
    Yum, Yunjin
    George, Kevin
    Kwon, Ji-Won
    Kim, Woo Kyung
    Baek, Hey-Sung
    Suh, Dong In
    Yang, Hyeon-Jong
    Yoo, Young
    Yu, Jinho
    Lim, Dae Hyun
    Seo, Sung-Chul
    Song, Dae Jin
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (09)
  • [38] Use of low-cost PM monitors and a multi-wavelength aethalometer to characterize PM2.5 in the Yakama Nation reservation
    Stampfer, Orly
    Austin, Elena
    Ganuelas, Terry
    Fiander, Tremain
    Seto, Edmund
    Karr, Catherine J.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 224
  • [39] Spatial-Temporal Analysis of PM2.5 and NO2 Concentrations Collected Using Low-Cost Sensors in Penuelas, Puerto Rico
    Reece, Stephen
    Williams, Ron
    Colon, Maribel
    Southgate, David
    Huertas, Evelyn
    O'Shea, Marie
    Iglesias, Ariel
    Sheridan, Patricia
    [J]. SENSORS, 2018, 18 (12)
  • [40] Low-Cost Sensor Performance Intercomparison, Correction Factor Development, and 2+Years of Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring in Accra, Ghana
    Raheja, Garima
    Nimo, James
    Appoh, Emmanuel K. -E.
    Essien, Benjamin
    Sunu, Maxwell
    Nyante, John
    Amegah, Mawuli
    Quansah, Reginald
    Arku, Raphael E.
    Penn, Stefani L.
    Giordano, Michael R.
    Zheng, Zhonghua
    Jack, Darby
    Chillrud, Steven
    Amegah, Kofi
    Subramanian, R.
    Pinder, Robert
    Appah-Sampong, Ebenezer
    Tetteh, Esi Nerquaye
    Borketey, Mathias A.
    Hughes, Allison Felix
    Westervelt, Daniel M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 57 (29) : 10708 - 10720