Assessing low-cost sensor for characterizing temporal variation of PM2.5 in Bandung, Indonesia

被引:1
作者
Kurniawati, Syukria [1 ]
Santoso, Muhayatun [1 ]
Nurhaini, Feni Fernita [1 ]
Atmodjo, Djoko Prakoso D. [1 ]
Lestiani, Diah Dwiana [1 ]
Ramadhani, Moch Faizal [1 ]
Kusmartini, Indah [1 ]
Syahfitri, Woro Yatu N. [1 ]
Damastuti, Endah [1 ]
Tursinah, Rasito [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy BRIN, Res Org Nucl Energy ORTN, Jl Tamansari 71, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia
关键词
Low-cost sensor; PurpleAir; SuperSASS; Temporal variation; PM2.5; PARTICULATE MATTER; URBAN; POLLUTION; PURPLEAIR;
D O I
10.1016/j.kjs.2024.100297
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is a concern due to its health effects, necessitating critical monitoring for both quantity and variability. Utilizing low-cost sensors to track PM2.5 is essential to augment other monitoring instruments, which are effective in generating temporal and spatial data. Therefore, in this study, we employed the low-cost PurpleAir (low-cost PA-II) to characterize the seasonal and diurnal variation of PM2.5 in Bandung, Indonesia, representing the densely populated metropolitan area of Bandung. During the sampling period from June 2022 to May 2023, co-location sampling with the filter-based Super Speciation Air Sampling System (SuperSASS) was employed to assess the low-cost PA-II. The PM2.5 data collected by the low-cost PA-II were compared to the SuperSASS data. The annual average mass concentration of PM2.5 measured by SuperSASS and the low-cost sensor was 31.51 +/- 15.53 mu g/m3 and 39.04 +/- 15.16 mu g/m3, respectively, surpassing the Indonesian government's regulation limit for an annual average of 15 mu g/m3. The comparative results of the two methods were obtained with R2 = 0.96, and low-cost PA-II data was 1.24 higher than SuperSASS. The difference may be attributed to several factors, including differences in sensor technology, calibration, location, and data processing. The seasonal variation indicated an increase in concentration during the dry season and a decrease during the wet season. The diurnal pattern indicates the morning peak between 06:00 and 08:00 during the rush hour, as well as the evening peak between 18:00 and 23:00, attributed to low temperatures and stagnant conditions. The diurnal pattern of PM2.5, which often exhibits the lowest peak at midday, is influenced by a combination of meteorological, atmospheric, and human activity factors. The findings suggested that the utilization of low-cost PA-II for a broader spatial scope is promising for real-time monitoring of PM2.5, to increase air pollution awareness in society.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Integrating low-cost air quality sensor networks with fixed and satellite monitoring systems to study ground-level PM2.5
    Li, Jiayu
    Zhang, Huang
    Chao, Chun-Ying
    Chien, Chih-Hsiang
    Wu, Chang-Yu
    Luo, Cyuan Heng
    Chen, Ling-Jyh
    Biswas, Pratim
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 223
  • [22] Intra- and inter-city variability of PM2.5 concentrations in Greece as determined with a low-cost sensor network
    Dimitriou, Konstantinos
    Stavroulas, Iasonas
    Grivas, Georgios
    Chatzidiakos, Charalampos
    Kosmopoulos, Georgios
    Kazantzidis, Andreas
    Kourtidis, Konstantinos
    Karagioras, Athanasios
    Hatzianastassiou, Nikolaos
    Pandis, Spyros N.
    Mihalopoulos, Nikolaos
    Gerasopoulos, Evangelos
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 301
  • [23] On the distribution of low-cost PM2.5 sensors in the US: demographic and air quality associations
    Priyanka deSouza
    Patrick L. Kinney
    Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 2021, 31 : 514 - 524
  • [24] Assessment of seasonal variation in PM2.5 concentration using low-cost sensors: A case study of Jaipur city, India
    Chaudhry, Sandeep Kumar
    Tripathi, Sachchida Nand
    Reddy, Tondapu Venkata Ramesh
    Madhwal, Sandeep
    Yadav, Amit Kumar
    Sahu, Ravi
    Pradhan, Pranav Kumar
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 345
  • [25] One year evaluation of three low-cost PM2.5 monitors
    Zamora, Misti Levy
    Rice, Jessica
    Koehler, Kirsten
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 235
  • [26] Contribution of low-cost sensor measurements to the prediction of PM2.5 levels: A case study in Imperial County, California, USA
    Bi, Jianzhao
    Stowell, Jennifer
    Seto, Edmund Y. W.
    English, Paul B.
    Al-Hamdan, Mohammad Z.
    Kinney, Patrick L.
    Freedman, Frank R.
    Liu, Yang
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 180
  • [27] Seasonal Changes in Urban PM2.5 Hotspots and Sources from Low-Cost Sensors
    Harr, Lorenz
    Sinsel, Tim
    Simon, Helge
    Esper, Jan
    ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (05)
  • [28] Insights about the Sources of PM2.5 in an Urban Area from Measurements of a Low-Cost Sensor Network
    Kosmopoulos, Georgios
    Salamalikis, Vasileios
    Matrali, Angeliki
    Pandis, Spyros N.
    Kazantzidis, Andreas
    ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (03)
  • [29] Characterizing indoor-outdoor PM 2.5 concentrations using low-cost sensor measurements in residential homes in Dhaka, Bangladesh
    Saha, Provat K.
    Habib, Ahsan
    Prapti, Dipika R.
    Jubair, Talha
    Zarrah, Abu U.
    Hossain, Chowdhury A.
    Rahman, Sheikh M.
    Salam, Abdus
    Bari, Md Aynul
    Marshall, Julian D.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 342
  • [30] Characterizing spatial distribution and temporal variation of PM10 and PM2.5 mass concentrations in an urban area of Southwest China
    Huang, Wei
    Long, Enshen
    Wang, Jun
    Huang, Ruyi
    Ma, Li
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2015, 6 (05) : 842 - 848