Value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging for preoperative prediction of future liver regeneration after hemihepatectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Fujita, Nobuhiro [1 ]
Ushijima, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Itoyama, Masahiro [1 ]
Okamoto, Daisuke [1 ]
Ishimatsu, Keisuke [1 ]
Tabata, Kosuke [1 ]
Itoh, Shinji [2 ]
Ishigami, Kousei [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Clin Radiol, 3-1-1 Maidashi,Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Surg & Sci, 3-1-1 Maidashi,Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
关键词
Gadoxetic acid; MRI; Liver regeneration; Hepatectomy; GD-EOB-DTPA; REMNANT LIVER; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION; HEPATIC RESECTION; RIGHT HEPATECTOMY; FIBROSIS; FAILURE; DISEASE; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1007/s11604-024-01629-w
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose Liver resection is currently considered the most effective treatment for patients with liver cancer. To the best of our knowledge, no study has investigated the association between gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and liver regeneration in patients who underwent hemihepatectomy. We aimed to clarify the relationship between the signal intensity (SI) of the liver parenchyma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and the degree of liver regeneration in patients who underwent hemihepatectomy. Materials and methods Forty-one patients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI before hemihepatectomy were enrolled. We calculated the liver-to-erector spinae muscle SI ratio (LMR) in the hepatobiliary phase and the precontrast images. Delta LMR was calculated using the following equation: Delta LMR = (LMR in the hepatobiliary phase-LMR in the precontrast image)/LMR in the precontrast image. The preoperative and postoperative remnant liver volumes (LVs) were calculated using CT volumetry. We calculated the resection rate (RR) and liver regeneration index (LRI) using the following formulas: RR = Resected LV/Total LV x 100 and LRI = (postoperative remnant LV-preoperative remnant LV)/preoperative remnant LV x 100. The relationships among LRI, imaging, and clinicopathological factors were analyzed. Results Univariate analysis showed RR and Delta LMR showed a positive correlation with LRI (rho = 0.4133, p = 0.0072 and rho = 0.7773, p < 0.001, respectively). Spleen volume showed a negative correlation with LRI (rho = -0.3138, p = 0.0486). Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed Delta LMR and RR were independently correlated with LRI (beta coefficient = 44.8771, p = 0.0198 and beta coefficient = 1.9653, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion Delta LMR may serve as a preoperative predictor of liver regeneration in patients undergoing hemihepatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:1439 / 1447
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Differentiation of lipid poor angiomyolipoma from hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging
    Kim, Rihyeon
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Dong Ho
    Woo, Sungmin
    Han, Joon Koo
    Choi, Byung Ihn
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2015, 40 (03): : 531 - 541
  • [42] Recent Advances in the Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Value of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Jeong Min
    LIVER CANCER, 2016, 5 (01) : 67 - 87
  • [43] Predictive value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for posthepatectomy liver failure: a systematic review
    Wang, Qiang
    Wang, Anrong
    Sparrelid, Ernesto
    Zhang, Jiaxing
    Zhao, Ying
    Ma, Kuansheng
    Brismar, Torkel B.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (03) : 1792 - 1803
  • [44] Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: Hepatocellular carcinoma and mimickers
    Kim, Yeun-Yoon
    Park, Mi-Suk
    Aljoqiman, Khalid Suliman
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 25 (03) : 223 - 233
  • [45] An Investigation of Transient Severe Motion Related to Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging
    Motosugi, Utaroh
    Bannas, Peter
    Bookwalter, Candice A.
    Sano, Katsuhiro
    Reeder, Scott B.
    RADIOLOGY, 2016, 279 (01) : 93 - 102
  • [46] The value of paradoxical uptake of hepatocellular carcinoma on the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of lipiodol uptake after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization
    Kim, Jeong Woo
    Lee, Chang Hee
    Park, Yang Shin
    Seo, Tae Seok
    Song, Myung Gyu
    Kim, Ji Hoon
    Kim, Kyeong Ah
    Park, Cheol Min
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 89 : 169 - 176
  • [47] Significance of the Signal Intensity of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging for Predicting the Efficacy of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Fujita, Nobuhiro
    Nishie, Akihiro
    Asayama, Yoshiki
    Ishigami, Kousei
    Ushijima, Yasuhiro
    Takayama, Yukihisa
    Okamoto, Daisuke
    Morita, Koichiro
    Shirabe, Ken
    Koto, Kazuhiro
    Kubo, Yuichiro
    Oda, Yoshinao
    Honda, Hiroshi
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 15 (01) : 111 - 120
  • [48] Value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in evaluation of hepatocellular carcinomas with atypical enhancement pattern on contrast-enhanced multiphasic MDCT in patients with chronic liver disease
    Kim, Hyun Su
    Kim, Seong Hyun
    Kang, Tae Wook
    Song, Kyoung Doo
    Choi, Dongil
    Park, Cheol Keun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (04) : 555 - 562
  • [49] Staging liver fibrosis by using liver-enhancement ratio of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging: comparison with aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index
    Motosugi, Utaroh
    Ichikawa, Tomoaki
    Oguri, Mitsuhiko
    Sano, Katsuhiro
    Sou, Hironobu
    Muhi, Ali
    Matsuda, Masanori
    Fujii, Hideki
    Enomoto, Nobuyuki
    Araki, Tsutomu
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 29 (08) : 1047 - 1052
  • [50] Imaging features of subcentimeter hypointense nodules on gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MR imaging that progress to hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease
    Jang, Kyung Mi
    Kim, Seong Hyun
    Kim, Young Kon
    Choi, Dongil
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2015, 56 (05) : 526 - 535