Virtual Clinic Telehealth Abortion Services in the United StatesOne Year After Dobbs:Landscape Review

被引:2
|
作者
Koenig, Leah R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ko, Jennifer [1 ,2 ]
Upadhyay, Ushma D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Adv New Stand Reprod Hlth, 330 Broadway,Suite 1100, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
[2] Univ Calif Oakland, Global Hlth Inst, Ctr Gender & Hlth Justice, Oakland, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
medication abortion; telehealth; virtual clinics; abortion; access; policy; health equity;
D O I
10.2196/50749
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Telehealth abortion has taken on a vital role in maintaining abortion access since the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Supreme Court decision. However, little remains known about the landscape of new telehealth-only virtual clinic abortion providers that have expanded since telehealth abortion first became widely available in the United States in 2021. Objective: This study aimed to (1) document the landscape of telehealth-only virtual clinic abortion care in the United States,(2) describe changes in the presence of virtual clinic abortion services between September 2022, following the Dobbs decision, and June 2023, and (3) identify structural factors that may perpetuate inequities in access to virtual clinic abortion care. Methods: We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study by reviewing web search results and abortion directories to identify virtual abortion clinics in September 2022 and June 2023 and described changes in the presence of virtual clinics between these2 periods. In June 2023, we also described each virtual clinic's policies, including states served, costs, patient age limits, insurance acceptance, financial assistance available, and gestational limits. Results: We documented 11 virtual clinics providing telehealth abortion care in 26 states and Washington DC in September2022. By June 2023, 20 virtual clinics were providing services in 27 states and Washington DC. Most (n=16) offered care to minors, 8 provided care until 10 weeks of pregnancy, and median costs were US $259. In addition, 2 accepted private insurance and 1 accepted Medicaid, within a limited number of states. Most (n=16) had some form of financial assistance available. Conclusions: Virtual clinic abortion providers have proliferated since the Dobbs decision. We documented inequities in the availability of telehealth abortion care from virtual clinics, including age restrictions that exclude minors, gestational limits for care, and limited insurance and Medicaid acceptance. Notably, virtual clinic abortion care was not permitted in 11 states wherein-person abortion is available.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] The Provision of Abortion Care via Telehealth in the United States: A Rapid Review
    Brown, Camille
    Neerland, Carrie E.
    Weinfurter, Elizabeth V.
    Saftner, Melissa A.
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2023, 68 (06) : 744 - 758
  • [2] LEGAL PERSPECTIVE ON ABORTION IN THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE AFTER THE DOBBS CASE
    Garcia-Anton Palacios, Elena
    REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2023, (63):
  • [3] DOBBS V. JACKSON, A YEAR LATER. ABORTION AND RELIGION IN THE UNITED STATES
    Palomino Lozano, Rafael
    REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2023, (63):
  • [4] Abortion needs expressed on Reddit after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision in the United States
    John, Jennifer Neda
    Martin, Zelly C.
    PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2024, 56 (01) : 41 - 49
  • [5] Telehealth lung cancer clinics: Specialized oncology services closer to home - A report of the joint Alberta cancer board and capital health telehealth virtual lung cancer triage & follow up clinic
    Winton, T.
    Butts, C.
    Janzen, H.
    Cummings, G.
    Hoeber, M.
    King, C.
    Delorme, T.
    Allen, D.
    Scrimger, R.
    Graham, N.
    Reinbold, D.
    Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on TELEHEALTH, 2005, : 90 - 95
  • [6] Assessment of Pregnancy-Related Telehealth Interventions in the United States: A 10-Year Scoping Review
    McCoy, Hannah C.
    Allison, Mary Kathryn
    Hernandez, Michelle
    Ali, Mir M.
    Stokes, Melony
    Bogulski, Cari A.
    Eswaran, Hari
    TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2024, 30 (01) : 36 - 46
  • [7] Efficacy of Clinic-Based Telehealth vs. Face-to-Face Interventions for Obesity Treatment in Children and Adolescents in the United States and Canada: A Systematic Review
    Whitley, Andrea
    Yahia, Najat
    CHILDHOOD OBESITY, 2021, 17 (05) : 299 - 310