Examining career trajectories of Norwegian PhD recipients: slower progression for women academics but not a leaky pipeline

被引:3
作者
Aksnes, Dag W. [1 ]
Kahn, Shulamit [2 ]
Reiling, Rune Borgan [1 ]
Ulvestad, Marte E. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nord Inst Studies Innovat Res & Educ NIFU, Oslo, Norway
[2] Boston Univ, Questrom Sch Business, Dept Markets Publ Policy & Law, Boston, MA USA
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Academic careers; gender gap; leaky pipeline; glass ceiling; survival analysis; DEMOGRAPHIC INERTIA; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; FULL PROFESSOR; ECONOMICS; SCIENCE; FACULTY; DIVERSITY; PROMOTION; REPRESENTATION; COUNTRIES;
D O I
10.1080/03075079.2024.2400545
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
We use longitudinal data for the entire population of Norwegian PhD recipients over five decades to examine why only one-third of full professors in Norway are women, despite gender balance among current PhDs. We find that 90% of the lower female representation is due to lower female proportions in earlier PhD cohorts, increasing sizes of cohorts, and decreasing overall rates of promotion, which together we call 'compositional/historical factors'. We find that the remaining imbalance is not caused by women dropping out, but rather by 14-18% slower average promotion rates calculated using hazard analysis. However, on average, women eventually catch up with men after about 20 years, although this differs by field. A similar hazard analysis for the US shows that women doctorates are less likely than men to enter tenure-track academia although more likely to enter non-tenure-track academia. This leads to larger US gender differences in advancement to full professorships and no eventual convergence. We suggest possible reasons for the differences between Norway and the US.
引用
收藏
页码:1797 / 1820
页数:24
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   SCIENCE-EDUCATION - THE PIPELINE IS LEAKING WOMEN ALL THE WAY ALONG [J].
ALPER, J .
SCIENCE, 1993, 260 (5106) :409-411
[2]   What Causes the Child Penalty? Evidence from Adopting and Same-Sex Couples [J].
Andresen, Martin Eckhoff ;
Nix, Emily .
JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 2022, :971-1004
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, GENDER DIFFERENCES C
[4]   Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter? [J].
Bagues, Manuel ;
Sylos-Labini, Mauro ;
Zinovyeva, Natalia .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 107 (04) :1207-1238
[5]   Diversity in the Economics Profession: A New Attack on an Old Problem [J].
Bayer, Amanda ;
Rouse, Cecilia Elena .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2016, 30 (04) :221-242
[6]  
Berryman S., 1983, Who will do science? Trends, and their causes in minority and female representation among holders of advanced degrees in science and mathematics
[7]   Gender and Promotions: Evidence from Academic Economists in France [J].
Bosquet, Clement ;
Combes, Pierre-Philippe ;
Garcia-Penalosa, Cecilia .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2019, 121 (03) :1020-1053
[8]   Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention and Promotion in the Social Sciences by Gender [J].
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. ;
Cunha, Raphael C. ;
Varbanov, Roumen A. ;
Hoh, Yee Shwen ;
Knisley, Margaret L. ;
Holmes, Mary Alice .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (11)
[9]   Fixing the Leaky Pipeline: Strategies for Making Economics Work for Women at Every Stage [J].
Buckles, Kasey .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2019, 33 (01) :43-60
[10]   Who wants to hire a more diverse faculty? A conjoint analysis of faculty and student preferences for gender and racial/ethnic diversity [J].
Carey, John M. ;
Carman, Kevin R. ;
Clayton, Katherine P. ;
Horiuchi, Yusaku ;
Htun, Mala ;
Ortiz, Brittany .
POLITICS GROUPS AND IDENTITIES, 2020, 8 (03) :535-553