Examining career trajectories of Norwegian PhD recipients: slower progression for women academics but not a leaky pipeline

被引:1
作者
Aksnes, Dag W. [1 ]
Kahn, Shulamit [2 ]
Reiling, Rune Borgan [1 ]
Ulvestad, Marte E. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nord Inst Studies Innovat Res & Educ NIFU, Oslo, Norway
[2] Boston Univ, Questrom Sch Business, Dept Markets Publ Policy & Law, Boston, MA USA
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Academic careers; gender gap; leaky pipeline; glass ceiling; survival analysis; DEMOGRAPHIC INERTIA; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; FULL PROFESSOR; ECONOMICS; SCIENCE; FACULTY; DIVERSITY; PROMOTION; REPRESENTATION; COUNTRIES;
D O I
10.1080/03075079.2024.2400545
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
We use longitudinal data for the entire population of Norwegian PhD recipients over five decades to examine why only one-third of full professors in Norway are women, despite gender balance among current PhDs. We find that 90% of the lower female representation is due to lower female proportions in earlier PhD cohorts, increasing sizes of cohorts, and decreasing overall rates of promotion, which together we call 'compositional/historical factors'. We find that the remaining imbalance is not caused by women dropping out, but rather by 14-18% slower average promotion rates calculated using hazard analysis. However, on average, women eventually catch up with men after about 20 years, although this differs by field. A similar hazard analysis for the US shows that women doctorates are less likely than men to enter tenure-track academia although more likely to enter non-tenure-track academia. This leads to larger US gender differences in advancement to full professorships and no eventual convergence. We suggest possible reasons for the differences between Norway and the US.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] SCIENCE-EDUCATION - THE PIPELINE IS LEAKING WOMEN ALL THE WAY ALONG
    ALPER, J
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1993, 260 (5106) : 409 - 411
  • [2] What Causes the Child Penalty? Evidence from Adopting and Same-Sex Couples
    Andresen, Martin Eckhoff
    Nix, Emily
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 2022, : 971 - 1004
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, GENDER DIFFERENCES C
  • [4] Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter?
    Bagues, Manuel
    Sylos-Labini, Mauro
    Zinovyeva, Natalia
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 107 (04) : 1207 - 1238
  • [5] Diversity in the Economics Profession: A New Attack on an Old Problem
    Bayer, Amanda
    Rouse, Cecilia Elena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2016, 30 (04) : 221 - 242
  • [6] Berryman S.E., 1983, A special report
  • [7] Gender and Promotions: Evidence from Academic Economists in France
    Bosquet, Clement
    Combes, Pierre-Philippe
    Garcia-Penalosa, Cecilia
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2019, 121 (03) : 1020 - 1053
  • [8] Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention and Promotion in the Social Sciences by Gender
    Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M.
    Cunha, Raphael C.
    Varbanov, Roumen A.
    Hoh, Yee Shwen
    Knisley, Margaret L.
    Holmes, Mary Alice
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (11):
  • [9] Fixing the Leaky Pipeline: Strategies for Making Economics Work for Women at Every Stage
    Buckles, Kasey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2019, 33 (01) : 43 - 60
  • [10] Who wants to hire a more diverse faculty? A conjoint analysis of faculty and student preferences for gender and racial/ethnic diversity
    Carey, John M.
    Carman, Kevin R.
    Clayton, Katherine P.
    Horiuchi, Yusaku
    Htun, Mala
    Ortiz, Brittany
    [J]. POLITICS GROUPS AND IDENTITIES, 2020, 8 (03) : 535 - 553