Wind tunnel investigation of hemispherical forebody interaction on the drag coefficient of a D-shaped model

被引:1
作者
Suresh, V [1 ]
Balusamy, Kathiravan [2 ]
Chidambaram, Senthilkumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Anna Univ, Dept Aerosp Engn, MIT Campus, Chennai, India
[2] Rajalakshmi Engn Coll, Dept Aeronaut Engn, Chennai, India
关键词
D-shaped model; Forebody; Interaction effect; Wind tunnel; Drag coefficient; CYLINDER; FLOW; REDUCTION; BODY;
D O I
10.1108/AEAT-12-2023-0326
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
PurposeAn experimental investigation of hemispherical forebody interaction effects on the drag coefficient of a D-shaped model is carried out for three-dimensional flow in the subcritical range of Reynolds number 1 x 105 <= Re <= 1.8 x 105. To study the interaction effect, hemispherical shapes of various sizes are attached to the upriver of the D-shaped bluff body model. The diameter of the hemisphere (b1) varied from 0.25 to 0.75 times the diameter of the D-shaped model (b2) and its gap from the D-shaped model (g/b2) ranged from 0.25 to 1.75 b2.Design/methodology/approachThe experiments were carried out in a low-speed open-circuit closed jet wind tunnel with test section dimensions of 1.2 x 0.9 x 1.8 m (W x H x L) capable of generating maximum velocity up to 45 m/s. The wind tunnel is equipped with a driving unit which has a 175-hp motor with three propellers controlled by a 160-kW inverter drive. Drag force is measured with an internal six-component balance with the help of the Spider 3013 E-pro data acquisition system.FindingsThe wind tunnel results show that the hemispherical forebody has a diameter ratio of 0.75 with a gap ratio of 0.25, resulting in a maximum drag reduction of 67%.Research limitations/implicationsThe turbulence intensity of the wind tunnel is about 5.6% at a velocity of 18 m/s. The uncertainty in the velocity and the drag coefficient measurement are about +/- 1.5 and +/- 2.83 %, respectively. The maximum error in the geometric model is about +/- 1.33 %.ractical implicationsThe results from the research work are helpful in choosing the optimum spacing of road vehicles, especially truck-trailer and launch vehicle applications.Social implicationsDrag reduction of road vehicle resulting less fuel consumption as well as less pollution to the environment. For instance, tractor trailer experiencing approximately 45% of aerodynamics drag is due to front part of the vehicle. The other contributors are 30% due to trailer base and 25% is due to under body flow. Nearly 65% of energy was spent to overcome the aerodynamic drag, when the vehicle is traveling at the average of 70 kmph (Seifert 2008 and Doyle 2008).Originality/valueThe benefits of placing the forebody in front of the main body will have a strong influence on reducing fuel consumption.
引用
收藏
页码:1259 / 1267
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Drag and lift reduction of a 3D bluff-body using active vortex generators [J].
Aider, Jean-Luc ;
Beaudoin, Jean-Francois ;
Wesfreid, Jose Eduardo .
EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2010, 48 (05) :771-789
[2]   Aero-spike and aero-disk effects of on wave drag reduction of supersonic flow past over blunt body [J].
Balusamy, Kathiravan ;
Vinothraj, A. ;
Suresh, V .
AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 96 (02) :233-247
[3]   Drag reduction with a sliding wall in flow over a circular cylinder [J].
Choi, B ;
Choi, H .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2000, 38 (04) :715-717
[5]  
Doyle J., 2008, 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, P323, DOI DOI 10.2514/6.2008-323
[6]  
Hoerner S.F., 1965, FLUID DYNAMIC DRAG, P312
[7]   AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY OF GEOMETRICAL EFFECTS ON THE DRAG AND FLOW FIELD OF 2 BLUFF-BODIES SEPARATED BY A GAP [J].
KOENIG, K ;
ROSHKO, A .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1985, 156 (JUL) :167-204
[8]  
Pamadi B.N., 1990, NASA TECHNICAL MEMOR
[9]   CROSS-FLOW AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF A NONCIRCULAR CYLINDER WITH AND WITHOUT STRAKES [J].
PAMADI, BN ;
GOWDA, BHL .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1992, 30 (12) :2864-2870
[10]   Drag reduction of a 3D bluff body using coherent streamwise streaks [J].
Pujals, G. ;
Depardon, S. ;
Cossu, C. .
EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2010, 49 (05) :1085-1094