Eco-friendly diet: nutrient digestibility, nitrogen and energy balances and growth performance of growing pigs

被引:0
|
作者
de Quelen, Francine [1 ]
Garcia-Launay, Florence [1 ]
Wilfart, Aurelie [2 ]
Dourmad, Jean-Yves [1 ]
Labussiere, Etienne [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] INRAE, Inst Agro, PEGASE, F-35590 St Gilles, France
[2] INRAE, Inst Agro, SAS, F-35000 Rennes, France
[3] INRAE, 3P, F-35590 St Gilles, France
关键词
alternative protein sources; environmental impacts; multiobjective formulation; nutritional composition; pig production; DISTILLERS DRIED GRAINS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; FARMING SYSTEMS; WHEAT MIDDLINGS; SOYBEAN-MEAL; COPRODUCTS; INCLUSION; SOLUBLES; PROTEIN; FEED;
D O I
10.1093/jas/skae203
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The traditional approach to formulating pig diets is based only on minimizing cost while meeting nutritional requirements and thus does not consider the environmental impacts associated with producing feed ingredients. To reduce the overall environmental impact of pork production, feed ingredients can be considered to formulate environmentally friendly diets. However, their potential effects on pig performance could decrease environmental benefits at the farm gate. The objective of this study was to quantify the effects of such eco-friendly pig diets on nitrogen (N) and energy (E) balances, the components of heat production (HP), and the performance of growing pigs. Digestibility coefficients of dry matter (84.5% vs. 88.2%, P < 0.01) and N (80.4% vs. 86.3%, P < 0.01) were significantly lower for the eco-friendly diet than the Control-diet (a commercial diet used in France). N excretion in feces was significantly higher for the group of pigs fed the eco-friendly diet than for the group fed the Control-diet (9.8 vs. 6.9 g/d, respectively, P = 0.01), while the N retention tended to be lower (27.8 vs. 30.3 g/d, respectively; P = 0.06). The metabolizable E:digestible E ratio did not differ between diets, but total HP was significantly lower for the eco-friendly diet group than for the Control-diet group (1,340 vs. 1,388 kJ/kg body weight0.60/d, respectively, P = 0.03). Using feed ingredients with lower environmental impacts, such as locally produced protein or co-products from wheat processing, is an effective way to decrease the environmental impacts of pig production. However, the nutritional composition of these eco-friendly ingredients could be overestimated, in particular the true digestibility of amino acids. This indicates the need to better estimate and consider the true digestibility of eco-friendly diets to decrease environmental impacts of livestock production without decreasing animal performance.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of different fibre sources on digestibility and nitrogen and energy balances in growing pigs
    Hansen, Michael Jorgen
    Chwalibog, Andre
    Tauson, Anne-Helene
    Sawosz, Ewa
    ARCHIVES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION, 2006, 60 (05) : 390 - 401
  • [2] Nutrient digestibility of extruded canola meal in ileal-cannulated growing pigs and effects of its feeding on diet nutrient digestibility and growth performance in weaned pigs
    Heyer, Charlotte M. E.
    Wang, Li F.
    Beltranena, Eduardo
    Zijlstra, Ruurd T.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 99 (05)
  • [3] Effects of low-energy diet supplemented with betaine on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and serum metabolomic profiles in growing pigs
    Fu, Runqi
    Liang, Chan
    Chen, Daiwen
    Tian, Gang
    Zheng, Ping
    He, Jun
    Yu, Jie
    Mao, Xiangbing
    Gu, Zhemin
    Yang, Wenwu
    Yu, Bing
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 101
  • [4] Effects of low-energy diet supplemented with betaine on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and serum metabolomic profiles in growing pigs
    Fu, Runqi
    Liang, Chan
    Chen, Daiwen
    Tian, Gang
    Zheng, Ping
    He, Jun
    Yu, Jie
    Mao, Xiangbing
    Gu, Zhemin
    Yang, Wenwu
    Yu, Bing
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 101
  • [5] The effect of dietary energy source on performance and nutrient digestibility in growing pigs
    Ball, M. E. E.
    Magowan, E.
    Beattie, V. E.
    McCracken, K. J.
    Henry, W.
    Smyth, S.
    Bradford, R.
    Gordon, F. J.
    Mayne, C. S.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND FEED SCIENCES, 2010, 19 (03): : 408 - 417
  • [6] Effects of space allocations and energy levels on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in growing and finishing pigs
    Lei, X. J.
    Yan, L.
    Kim, Y. M.
    Kim, I. H.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY AND ANIMAL NUTRITION, 2018, 102 (01) : E498 - E503
  • [7] Effects of phytezyme supplementation on the growth performance and nutrient digestibility in growing pigs
    Hong, JW
    Kim, IH
    Kwon, OS
    Lee, SH
    Bae, HD
    Kang, SJ
    Yang, UM
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2001, 14 (10): : 1440 - 1443
  • [8] Effects of protease on growth performance and nutrient digestibility of growing pigs.
    Baek, J.
    Park, S.
    Lee, J. J.
    Kim, J.
    Kim, S.
    Jang, K.
    Kim, B.
    Kang, J.
    Mun, D.
    Choe, J.
    Park, I. H.
    Cho, J. Y.
    Cho, S. H.
    Song, M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2017, 95 : 208 - 208
  • [9] Effects of environmentally friendly agents on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, nutrient excretion and carcass characteristics in growing-finishing pigs
    Min, TS
    Kim, JD
    Hyun, Y
    Sohn, KS
    Heo, KN
    Han, IK
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2001, 14 (04): : 540 - 547
  • [10] The effects of environment-friendly diets on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal excretion, nitrogen excretion and emission gas in swine manure of growing pigs
    Yoo, J. S.
    Cho, J. H.
    Chen, Y. G.
    Kim, H. J.
    Wang, Q.
    Hyun, Y.
    Ko, T. G.
    Park, C. S.
    Kim, I. H.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2007, 90 : 305 - 305