The Learning Assessment Process in Higher Education: A Grounded Theory Approach

被引:2
作者
Aguayo-Hernandez, Claudia H. [1 ]
Guerrero, Alejandro Sanchez [2 ]
Vazquez-Villegas, Patricia [3 ]
机构
[1] Tecnol Monterrey, Acad Vicerectory, Monterrey 64849, Mexico
[2] Univ Anahuac Mexico, Ctr Anahuac Desarrollo Estrateg Bioet CADEBI, Huixquilucan 52786, Mexico
[3] Tecnol Monterrey, Inst Future Educ, Monterrey 64849, Mexico
关键词
educational innovation; higher education; intersubjectivity; learning assessment; teaching competence; teaching perspective; TEACHER ASSESSMENT LITERACY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.3390/educsci14090984
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study aims to understand university professors' perspectives on the learning assessment process, including its importance during teaching and learning, their conceptualization, and their considerations in their practices. The research used a grounded theory approach to recognize evaluation as a dialogical and intersubjective space. The methodology consisted of an open survey and a semi-structured interview with faculty professors from a university in northern Mexico. The findings highlighted the importance of educational institutions, emphasizing that faculties prioritize evaluating quality based on relevance, alignment with learning objectives, continuity throughout the process, and feedback. These aspects align with recent approaches that consider evaluation as a process that promotes learning, as evidenced by the high saturation rate in the theoretical sampling. Furthermore, the study revealed that the institution's educational model, curricular design, and evaluation policies significantly influence the faculty members' perspective. As a result, educational institutions must consider these factors when formulating an evaluation model, thereby making the research directly applicable to the work of educational policymakers and university professors.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Alvarado Nando M., 2020, La Pandemia de la COVID-19 como Oportunidad para Repensar la Educacin Superior en Mxico, P15
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, EVALUATION THEORY MO
[3]  
Bailey A., 2020, Classroom Assessment and Educational Measurement, P47
[4]  
Barnes N., 2015, International Handbook of Research on Teacher's Beliefs
[5]  
Barrientos-Hernan E. J., 2020, Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluacion Educativa, V13, P67, DOI [10.15366/riee2020.13.2.004, DOI 10.15366/RIEE2020.13.2.004]
[6]  
Sarguera RB, 2021, REV UNIV SOC, V13, P363
[7]  
Blumer H., 1982, Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method
[8]   Standards and assessment: coherence from the teacher's perspective [J].
Bonner, Sarah M. ;
Rivera, Camila Torres ;
Chen, Peggy P. .
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2018, 30 (01) :71-92
[9]  
Box C., 2019, Formative Assessment in United States Classrooms, P181, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-03092-6
[10]  
Brookhart S., 2003, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, V22, P5, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1745-3992.2003.TB00139.X