Dynamics modeling and comparative analysis for underwater gliders considering different ranges of attack angle

被引:1
作者
Tan, Lijie [1 ]
Wu, Hongyu [2 ]
Song, Yang [4 ]
Wu, Qingjian [1 ]
Jiang, Zhihong [1 ]
Yang, Yunqiang [1 ]
Yan, Shaoze [3 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci Beijing, Sch Engn & Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Mech Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Mech Engn, State Key Lab Tribol Adv Equipment, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[4] Newcastle Univ, Sch Engn, Marine Offshore & Subsea Technol Grp, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, England
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Dynamics modeling; Underwater glider; CFD analysis; Attack angle range; Comparative study; MOTION; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETERS; DESIGN; SHAPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118941
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
The underwater glider, which relies on buoyancy and attitude adjustments to achieve spatial motion, is an energy-saving observation platform for ocean phenomenon. Accurate dynamic models have important guiding significance for performance evaluation and controller design of the glider. This paper takes the Petrel glider as the research object, and establishes four types of dynamic models considering different ranges of attack angle, which has never been reported before. The model difference is mainly reflected in the viscous hydrodynamic equations obtained by using polynomials to fit computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation results. Then, some numerical cases are given to study the dynamics response difference of these models considering the ideal working condition and complex water current environments, respectively. The results indicate that there is not obvious dynamics response difference under the steady-state gliding condition, and the difference mainly occurs during the glider motion transition stage. Under the complex water current conditions, the dynamics response difference will be very significant, and the traditional dynamic models may exhibit the non-convergence issues. The comprehensive model established in this paper, which fully considers the ranges of attack angle, can better simulate the dynamics behavior of the glider and can provide certain theoretical guidance for actual application.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [11] A self-searching optimal ADRC for the pitch angle control of an underwater thermal glider in the vertical plane motion
    Huang, Zhijian
    Zheng, Huan
    Wang, Shengtang
    Liu, Yanji
    Ma, Jie
    Liu, Yihua
    [J]. OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2018, 159 : 98 - 111
  • [12] Gliding hydrodynamic modeling and identification of underwater glider based on differential evolution algorithm
    Lei, Lei
    Gang, Yang
    Jing, Guo
    Chen, Liqun
    [J]. OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2022, 244
  • [13] Model-based feedback control of autonomous underwater gliders
    Leonard, NE
    Graver, JG
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF OCEANIC ENGINEERING, 2001, 26 (04) : 633 - 645
  • [14] Optimizing crashworthiness design of square honeycomb structure
    Li Meng
    Deng Zong-quan
    Guo Hong-wei
    Liu Rong-qiang
    Ding Bei-chen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY, 2014, 21 (03) : 912 - 919
  • [15] Li SF, 2018, OCEANS 2018 MTS/IEEE CHARLESTON
  • [16] A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR SELECTING VALUES OF INPUT VARIABLES IN THE ANALYSIS OF OUTPUT FROM A COMPUTER CODE
    MCKAY, MD
    BECKMAN, RJ
    CONOVER, WJ
    [J]. TECHNOMETRICS, 1979, 21 (02) : 239 - 245
  • [17] Russell-Cargill L. M., 2018, The APPEA Journal, V58, P367
  • [18] CFD approach to modelling, hydrodynamic analysis and motion characteristics of a laboratory underwater glider with experimental results
    Singh, Yogang
    Bhattacharyya, S. K.
    Idichandy, V. G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCEAN ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, 2017, 2 (02) : 90 - 119
  • [19] Sensitivity analysis and parameter optimization of energy consumption for underwater gliders
    Song, Yang
    Wang, Yanhui
    Yang, Shaoqiong
    Wang, Shuxin
    Yang, Ming
    [J]. ENERGY, 2020, 191 (191)
  • [20] Stommel H., 1989, OCEANOGRAPHY, V2, P22, DOI DOI 10.5670/OCEANOG.1989.26