Freud and the Two Michelangelos

被引:0
|
作者
Parsons, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] 3 South Green Rd, Cambridge CB3 9JP, England
关键词
Freud; Michelangelo; art; literature; uncanny; word- and thing-presentation;
D O I
10.1080/07351690.2024.2345572
中图分类号
B84-0 [心理学理论];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
The aesthetic experience of an art work, and the analytic experience, are both created in a partnership; between artist and viewer, and analyst and patient. They take the viewer of an art work, and the analytic patient, beyond their familiar ways of relating to the world. The Moses of Michelangelo made a powerful impact on Freud, but he was unable to appreciate the aesthetic experience because he could not understand it rationally. Giving up the assumption that a work of art must represent something allows a different kind of engagement with it that is more contemplative and more psychoanalytic. Freud identified with Moses as a Jewish hero preserving the word-presentations of the Law against the irrational thing-presentation of the Golden Calf. A different response to the Moses appears in a film by Michelangelo Antonioni. Without words, it shows Antonioni gazing at the statue and interacting with it emotionally. Antonioni made the film aged 92. It is the last footage he shot, and its ending shows that, as well as the statue, he is gazing at his own death.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 368
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条