Study on the Influencing Factors of Forest Tree-Species Classification Based on Landsat and Sentinel-2 Imagery

被引:0
|
作者
Lai, Xin [1 ]
Tang, Xu [2 ]
Ren, Zhaotong [1 ]
Li, Yuecan [1 ]
Huang, Runlian [1 ]
Chen, Jianjun [1 ]
You, Haotian [1 ]
机构
[1] Guilin Univ Technol, Coll Geomatics & Geoinformat, 12 Jiangan Rd, Guilin 541006, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Forest Inventory & Planning Inst, 14 Zhonghua Rd, Nanning 530011, Peoples R China
来源
FORESTS | 2024年 / 15卷 / 09期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Landsat-8; Landsat-9; Sentinel-2; multi-source data integration; tree-species classification; influencing factors; SPECTRAL REFLECTANCE; CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT; LEAF; VEGETATION; INDEXES; DELINEATION; ECOSYSTEMS;
D O I
10.3390/f15091511
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Accurate forest tree-species classification not only provides data support for forest resource management but also serves as a crucial parameter for simulating various ecological processes. However, the results of forest tree-species classification have been affected by multiple factors, such as the spectral resolution, spatial resolution, and radiometric resolution of imagery, the classification algorithms used, the sample size, and the timing of image acquisition phases. Although there are many studies on the impact of individual factors on tree-species classification, there is a lack of systematic studies quantifying the magnitude of these factors' influences, leading to uncertainties about the relative importance of different factors. In this study, Landsat-8, Landsat-9, and Sentinel-2 imagery was used as the foundational data, and random forest (RF), gradient tree boosting (GTB), and support vector machine (SVM) algorithms were employed to classify forest tree species. High-accuracy regional forest tree-species classification was achieved by exploring the impacts of spectral resolution, spatial resolution, radiometric resolution, classification algorithms, sample size, and image time phases. The results show that, for the commonly used Landsat-8, Landsat-9, and Sentinel-2 imagery, the tree-species classification results from Landsat-9 are the best, with an overall accuracy of 74.21% and a kappa of 0.71. Among the various influencing factors, the classification algorithm, image time phases, and sample size have relatively larger impacts on tree-species classification results, each exceeding 10%, while the positive impact of radiometric resolution is the smallest, at only 3.15%. Conversely, spectral and spatial resolutions had negative effects on tree-species classification results, at -4.09% and -1.4%, respectively. Based on the 30-m spring Landsat-9 and Sentinel-2 imagery, with 300 samples for each tree-species category, the classification results using the RF algorithm were the best, with an overall accuracy of 87.07% and a kappa coefficient of 0.85. The results indicate that different factors have different impacts on forest tree-species classification results, with classification algorithms, image time phases, and sample size having the largest impacts. Higher spatial and spectral resolutions do not improve the classification accuracy. Therefore, future studies should focus on selecting appropriate classification algorithms, sample sizes, and images from seasons with greater tree differences to improve tree-species classification results.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Temporal Transferability of Tree Species Classification in Temperate Forests with Sentinel-2 Time Series
    Verhulst, Margot
    Heremans, Stien
    Blaschko, Matthew B.
    Somers, Ben
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (14)
  • [32] Object-Based Multigrained Cascade Forest Method for Wetland Classification Using Sentinel-2 and Radarsat-2 Imagery
    Liu, Huaxin
    Jiang, Qigang
    Ma, Yue
    Yang, Qian
    Shi, Pengfei
    Zhang, Sen
    Tan, Yang
    Xi, Jing
    Zhang, Yibo
    Liu, Bin
    Gao, Xin
    WATER, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [33] Monitoring Invasion Process of Spartina alterniflora by Seasonal Sentinel-2 Imagery and an Object-Based Random Forest Classification
    Tian, Yanlin
    Jia, Mingming
    Wang, Zongming
    Mao, Dehua
    Du, Baojia
    Wang, Chao
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (09)
  • [34] Fusion of Dense Airborne LiDAR and Multispectral Sentinel-2 and Pleiades Satellite Imagery for Mapping Riparian Forest Species Biodiversity at Tree Level
    Njimi, Houssem
    Chehata, Nesrine
    Revers, Frederic
    SENSORS, 2024, 24 (06)
  • [35] Synergy of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Imagery for Crop Classification Based on DC-CNN
    Zhang, Kaixin
    Yuan, Da
    Yang, Huijin
    Zhao, Jianhui
    Li, Ning
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [36] Integrating GEDI, Sentinel-2, and Sentinel-1 imagery for tree crops mapping
    Adrah, Esmaeel
    Wong, Jesse Pan
    Yin, He
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 319
  • [37] Deep Learning for sub-pixel palm tree classification using spaceborne Sentinel-2 imagery
    Culman, Maria
    Rodriguez, Andres C.
    Wegner, Jan Dirk
    Delalieux, Stephanie
    Somers, Ben
    REMOTE SENSING FOR AGRICULTURE, ECOSYSTEMS, AND HYDROLOGY XXIII, 2021, 11856
  • [38] Combination of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Data for Tree Species Classification in a Central European Biosphere Reserve
    Lechner, Michael
    Dostalova, Alena
    Hollaus, Markus
    Atzberger, Clement
    Immitzer, Markus
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (11)
  • [39] Mapping of forest tree distribution and estimation of forest biodiversity using Sentinel-2 imagery in the University Research Forest Taxiarchis in Chalkidiki, Greece
    Kampouri, Maria
    Kolokoussis, Polychronis
    Argialas, Demetre
    Karathanassi, Vassilia
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 34 (12) : 1273 - 1285
  • [40] Automated Recognition of Tree Species Composition of Forest Communities Using Sentinel-2 Satellite Data
    Polyakova, Alika
    Mukharamova, Svetlana
    Yermolaev, Oleg
    Shaykhutdinova, Galiya
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (02)