A shared decision-making intervention for individuals living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who are considering the menu of pulmonary rehabilitation treatment options; a feasibility study

被引:0
作者
Barradell, A. C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Doe, G. [1 ]
Bekker, H. L. [4 ,5 ]
Houchen-Wolloff, L. [1 ,2 ]
Robertson, N. [6 ]
Singh, S. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Glenfield Hosp, Leicester Biomed Res Ctr Resp, Dept Resp Sci, Leicester, England
[2] Glenfield Hosp, Ctr Exercise & Rehabil Sci, Leicester Biomed Res Ctr Resp, Groby Rd, Leicester LE3 9QP, England
[3] Leicester Gen Hosp, Coll Med Biol Sci & Psychol, Natl Inst Hlth Res NIHR Appl Res Collaborat East M, Gwendolen Rd, Leicester LE5 4PW, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Sch Med, Leeds Unit Complex Intervent Dev LUICD, Leeds, England
[5] Aarhus Univ, Res Ctr Individual Involvement, Dept Publ Hlth, Aarhus, Denmark
[6] Univ Leicester, Dept Neurosci Psychol & Behav, Leicester, England
关键词
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; pulmonary rehabilitation; shared decision making; patient decision aid; decision coaching; PATIENT ACTIVATION; INTERVIEWS; PROGRAM; SAMPLE; FOCUS; COPD; AIDS;
D O I
10.1177/14799731241238428
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectivesShared Decision Making (SDM) has potential to support Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) decision-making when patients are offered a menu of centre- and home-based options. This study sought to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a three-component PR SDM intervention for individuals with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and PR healthcare professionals.MethodsParticipants were recruited from Dec 2021-Sep 2022. Healthcare professionals attended decision coaching training and used the consultation prompt during consultations. Individuals received the Patient Decision Aid (PtDA) at PR referral. Outcomes included recruitment capability, data completeness, intervention fidelity, and acceptability. Questionnaires assessed patient activation and decisional conflict pre and post-PR. Consultations were assessed using Observer OPTION-5. Optional interviews/focus groups were conducted.Results13% of individuals [n = 31, 32% female, mean (SD) age 71.19 (7.50), median (IQR) MRC dyspnoea 3.50 (1.75)] and 100 % of healthcare professionals (n = 9, 78% female) were recruited. 28 (90.32%) of individuals completed all questionnaires. SDM was present in all consultations [standardised scores were mean (SD) = 36.97 (21.40)]. Six healthcare professionals and five individuals were interviewed. All felt consultations using the PtDA minimised healthcare professionals' bias of centre-based PR, increased individuals' self-awareness of their health, prompted consideration of how to improve it, and increased involvement in decision-making.DiscussionResults indicate the study processes and SDM intervention is feasible and acceptable and can be delivered with fidelity when integrated into the PR pathway.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] A qualitative assessment of the pulmonary rehabilitation decision-making needs of patients living with COPD
    Barradell, A. C.
    Bourne, C.
    Alkhathlan, B.
    Larkin, M.
    Singh, S. J.
    [J]. NPJ PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2022, 32 (01)
  • [2] Exploring the Presence of Implicit Bias Amongst Healthcare Professionals Who Refer Individuals Living with COPD to Pulmonary Rehabilitation with a Specific Focus Upon Smoking and Exercise
    Barradell, Amy C.
    Robertson, Noelle
    Houchen-Wolloff, Linzy
    Singh, Sally J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2023, 18 : 1287 - 1299
  • [3] Systematic review of shared decision-making interventions for people living with chronic respiratory diseases
    Barradell, Amy C.
    Gerlis, Charlotte
    Houchen-Wolloff, Linzy
    Bekker, Hilary L.
    Robertson, Noelle
    Singh, Sally J.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [4] A pulmonary rehabilitation shared decision-making intervention for patients living with COPD: PReSent: protocol for a feasibility study
    Barradell, Amy C.
    Singh, Sally J.
    Houchen-Wolloff, Linzy
    Robertson, Noelle
    Bekker, Hilary L.
    [J]. ERJ OPEN RESEARCH, 2022, 8 (02)
  • [5] Understanding why decision aids work: linking process with outcome
    Bekker, HL
    Hewison, J
    Thornton, JG
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2003, 50 (03) : 323 - 329
  • [6] Braun V., 2012, APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, V2, P57, DOI [10.1037/13620-004, DOI 10.1037/13620-004, 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613, DOI 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613]
  • [7] How to routinely collect data on patient-reported outcome and experience measures in renal registries in Europe: an expert consensus meeting
    Breckenridge, Kate
    Bekker, Hillary L.
    Gibbons, Elizabeth
    van der Veer, Sabine N.
    Abbott, Denise
    Briancon, Serge
    Cullen, Ron
    Garneata, Liliana
    Jager, Kitty J.
    Lonning, Kjersti
    Metcalfe, Wendy
    Morton, Rachael L.
    Murtagh, Fliss E. M.
    Prutz, Karl
    Robertson, Susan
    Rychlik, Ivan
    Schon, Steffan
    Sharp, Linda
    Speyer, Elodie
    Tentori, Francesca
    Caskey, Fergus J.
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 30 (10) : 1605 - 1614
  • [8] The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research
    Brooks, Joanna
    McCluskey, Serena
    Turley, Emma
    King, Nigel
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 12 (02) : 202 - 222
  • [9] ON THE USE OF A PILOT SAMPLE FOR SAMPLE-SIZE DETERMINATION
    BROWNE, RH
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (17) : 1933 - 1940
  • [10] Burr V., 2015, Social constructionism, V3rd ed., DOI [10.4324/9781315715421/SOCIAL-CONSTRUCTIONISM-VIVIEN-BURR, DOI 10.4324/9781315715421/SOCIAL-CONSTRUCTIONISM-VIVIEN-BURR]