Impact of AI for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Detection and Interpretation Time

被引:4
|
作者
Park, Eun Kyung [1 ]
Kwak, SooYoung [1 ]
Lee, Weonsuk [1 ]
Choi, Joon Suk [1 ]
Kooi, Thijs [1 ]
Kim, Eun-Kyung [2 ]
机构
[1] Lunit, 374 Gangnam Daero, Seoul 06241, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Yongin Severance Hosp, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Yongin, South Korea
关键词
COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; OUTCOMES; PERFORMANCE; ACCURACY; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1148/ryai.230318
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for the diagnosis of breast cancer on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images and to investigate whether it could improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce radiologist reading time. Materials and Methods: A deep learning AI algorithm was developed and validated for DBT with retrospectively collected examinations (January 2010 to December 2021) from 14 institutions in the United States and South Korea. A multicenter reader study was performed to compare the performance of 15 radiologists (seven breast specialists, eight general radiologists) in interpreting DBT examinations in 258 women (mean age, 56 years +/- 13.41 [SD]), including 65 cancer cases, with and without the use of AI. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and reading time were evaluated. Results: The AUC for stand-alone AI performance was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.94). With AI, radiologists' AUC improved from 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.93) to 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.96) (P = .003) in the reader study. AI showed higher specificity (89.64% [95% CI: 85.34%, 93.94%]) than radiologists (77.34% [95% CI: 75.82%, 78.87%]) (P < .001). When reading with AI, radiologists' sensitivity increased from 85.44% (95% CI: 83.22%, 87.65%) to 87.69% (95% CI: 85.63%, 89.75%) (P = .04), with no evidence of a difference in specificity. Reading time decreased from 54.41 seconds (95% CI: 52.56, 56.27) without AI to 48.52 seconds (95% CI: 46.79, 50.25) with AI (P < .001). Interreader agreement measured by Fleiss kappa increased from 0.59 to 0.62. Conclusion: The AI model showed better diagnostic accuracy than radiologists in breast cancer detection, as well as reduced reading times. The concurrent use of AI in DBT interpretation could improve both accuracy and efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis for detection of breast cancer in the intraoperative specimen during breast-conserving surgery
    Urano, Misugi
    Shiraki, Norio
    Kawai, Tatsuya
    Goto, Taeko
    Endo, Yumi
    Yoshimoto, Nobuyasu
    Toyama, Tatsuya
    Shibamoto, Yuta
    BREAST CANCER, 2016, 23 (05) : 706 - 711
  • [42] Breast cancer detection using machine learning in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: A systematic review
    Malliori, A.
    Pallikarakis, N.
    HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 12 (05) : 893 - 910
  • [43] Time for Change in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Research
    Kopans, Daniel B.
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 302 (02) : 293 - 294
  • [44] Development of digital breast tomosynthesis and diffuse optical tomography fusion imaging for breast cancer detection
    Eun Young Chae
    Hak Hee Kim
    Sohail Sabir
    Yejin Kim
    Hyeongseok Kim
    Sungho Yoon
    Jong Chul Ye
    Seungryong Cho
    Duchang Heo
    Kee Hyun Kim
    Young Min Bae
    Young-Wook Choi
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [45] Development of digital breast tomosynthesis and diffuse optical tomography fusion imaging for breast cancer detection
    Chae, Eun Young
    Kim, Hak Hee
    Sabir, Sohail
    Kim, Yejin
    Kim, Hyeongseok
    Yoon, Sungho
    Ye, Jong Chul
    Cho, Seungryong
    Heo, Duchang
    Kim, Kee Hyun
    Bae, Young Min
    Choi, Young-Wook
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [46] Breast cancer detection using machine learning in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: A systematic review
    A. Malliori
    N. Pallikarakis
    Health and Technology, 2022, 12 : 893 - 910
  • [47] Imaging features of breast cancers on digital breast tomosynthesis according to molecular subtype: association with breast cancer detection
    Lee, Su Hyun
    Chang, Jung Min
    Shin, Sung Ui
    Chu, A. Jung
    Yi, Ann
    Cho, Nariya
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 90 (1080):
  • [48] COMPARISON BETWEEN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY AND DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST CANCER
    Jari, Irina
    Naum, A. G.
    Gheorghe, Liliana
    Negru, D.
    Ursaru, Manuela
    MEDICAL-SURGICAL JOURNAL-REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALA, 2019, 123 (01): : 102 - 108
  • [49] Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density
    Conant, Emily F.
    Barlow, William E.
    Herschorn, Sally D.
    Weaver, Donald L.
    Beaber, Elisabeth F.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Haas, Jennifer S.
    Lowry, Kathryn P.
    Stout, Natasha K.
    Trentham-Dietz, Amy
    diFlorio-Alexander, Roberta M.
    Li, Christopher I.
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    Onega, Tracy
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Haas, Jennifer S.
    Onega, Tracy
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Birdwell, Robyn
    Khorasani, Ramin
    Lacson, Ronilda
    Ozanne, Elissa
    Tosteson, Tor D.
    Bronson, Mackenzie
    Chen, Jane
    Goodrich, Martha
    Harris, Kimberly A.
    St Hubert, Stella
    Pearson, Loretta
    Andrews, Steven
    Anton, Kristen
    Batcho, Katrine
    Brawarsky, Phyllis
    Cook, Charles
    Das, Amar
    Dougher, Ryan
    Eliassen, Scottie
    Farr, Scott
    Felone, Carol
    Frazee, Tracy
    Gerlach, Scott
    Getty, George
    Gilman, John
    Hanson, Dick
    Johnson, Dennis
    Joseph, Brenda
    Laam, Leslie A.
    Levin, Brian
    Pyle, Steven
    Sims-Larabee, Laura
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2019, 5 (05) : 635 - 642
  • [50] AI Systems for Mammography with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Expectations and Challenges
    Kataoka, Masako
    Uematsu, Takayoshi
    RADIOLOGY-IMAGING CANCER, 2024, 6 (04):