Impact of AI for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Detection and Interpretation Time

被引:4
|
作者
Park, Eun Kyung [1 ]
Kwak, SooYoung [1 ]
Lee, Weonsuk [1 ]
Choi, Joon Suk [1 ]
Kooi, Thijs [1 ]
Kim, Eun-Kyung [2 ]
机构
[1] Lunit, 374 Gangnam Daero, Seoul 06241, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Yongin Severance Hosp, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Yongin, South Korea
关键词
COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; OUTCOMES; PERFORMANCE; ACCURACY; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1148/ryai.230318
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for the diagnosis of breast cancer on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images and to investigate whether it could improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce radiologist reading time. Materials and Methods: A deep learning AI algorithm was developed and validated for DBT with retrospectively collected examinations (January 2010 to December 2021) from 14 institutions in the United States and South Korea. A multicenter reader study was performed to compare the performance of 15 radiologists (seven breast specialists, eight general radiologists) in interpreting DBT examinations in 258 women (mean age, 56 years +/- 13.41 [SD]), including 65 cancer cases, with and without the use of AI. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and reading time were evaluated. Results: The AUC for stand-alone AI performance was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.94). With AI, radiologists' AUC improved from 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.93) to 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.96) (P = .003) in the reader study. AI showed higher specificity (89.64% [95% CI: 85.34%, 93.94%]) than radiologists (77.34% [95% CI: 75.82%, 78.87%]) (P < .001). When reading with AI, radiologists' sensitivity increased from 85.44% (95% CI: 83.22%, 87.65%) to 87.69% (95% CI: 85.63%, 89.75%) (P = .04), with no evidence of a difference in specificity. Reading time decreased from 54.41 seconds (95% CI: 52.56, 56.27) without AI to 48.52 seconds (95% CI: 46.79, 50.25) with AI (P < .001). Interreader agreement measured by Fleiss kappa increased from 0.59 to 0.62. Conclusion: The AI model showed better diagnostic accuracy than radiologists in breast cancer detection, as well as reduced reading times. The concurrent use of AI in DBT interpretation could improve both accuracy and efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Are Initial Benefits Sustained?
    Bahl, Manisha
    Mercaldo, Sarah
    Dang, Pragya A.
    Mccarthy, Anne Marie
    Lowry, Kathryn P.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 295 (03) : 529 - 539
  • [32] Organizational impact of systemic implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis as a primary test for breast cancer screening in Italy
    Djuric, Olivera
    Deandrea, Silvia
    Mantellini, Paola
    Sardanelli, Francesco
    Venturelli, Francesco
    Montemezzi, Stefania
    Vecchio, Riccardo
    Bucchi, Lauro
    Senore, Carlo
    Giordano, Livia
    Paci, Eugenio
    Bonifacino, Adriana
    Calabrese, Massimo
    Caumo, Francesca
    Degrassi, Flori
    de' Bianchi, Priscilla Sassoli
    Battisti, Francesca
    Zappa, Marco
    Pattacini, Pierpaolo
    Campari, Cinzia
    Nitrosi, Andrea
    Di Leo, Giovanni
    Frigerio, Alfonso
    Magni, Veronica
    Fornasa, Francesca
    Romanucci, Giovanna
    Falini, Patrizia
    Auzzi, Noemi
    Armaroli, Paola
    Rossi, Paolo Giorgi
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2024, 129 (08): : 1156 - 1172
  • [33] Breast cancer detection: Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis across non-dense and dense breasts
    Hadadi, I.
    Rae, W.
    Clarke, J.
    McEntee, M.
    Ekpo, E.
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2021, 27 (04) : 1027 - 1032
  • [34] Outcomes by Race in Breast Cancer Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography
    Alsheik, Nila
    Blount, Linda
    Qiong, Qiu
    Talley, Melinda
    Pohlman, Scott
    Troeger, Kathleen
    Abbey, Genevieve
    Mango, Victoria L.
    Pollack, Erica
    Chong, Alice
    Donadio, Greg
    Behling, Michael
    Mortimer, Kathleen
    Conant, Emily
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 18 (07) : 906 - 918
  • [35] Fully automated nipple detection in digital breast tomosynthesis
    Chae, Seung-Hoon
    Jeong, Ji-Wook
    Choi, Jang-Hwan
    Chae, Eun Young
    Kim, Hak Hee
    Choi, Young-Wook
    Lee, Sooyeul
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2017, 143 : 113 - 120
  • [36] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening for Breast Cancer: It Is Cost-effective!
    Slanetz, Priscilla J.
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 297 (01) : 49 - 50
  • [37] Breast Density and Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A TOSYMA Trial Subanalysis
    Weigel, Stefanie
    Heindel, Walter
    Hense, Hans-Werner
    Decker, Thomas
    Gerss, Joachim
    Kerschke, Laura
    TOSYMA Screening Trial Study Grp
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 306 (02)
  • [38] Benefit of adding digital breast tomosynthesis to digital mammography for breast cancer screening focused on cancer characteristics: a meta-analysis
    Yun, Seong Jong
    Ryu, Chang-Woo
    Rhee, Sun Jung
    Ryu, Jung Kyu
    Oh, Ji Young
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 164 (03) : 557 - 569
  • [39] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and the Challenges of Implementing an Emerging Breast Cancer Screening Technology Into Clinical Practice
    Lee, Christoph I.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 10 (12) : 913 - 917
  • [40] FAST DETECTION OF CONVERGENCE AREAS IN DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS
    Palma, G.
    Muller, S.
    Bloch, I.
    Iordache, R.
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING: FROM NANO TO MACRO, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 847 - +