Impact of AI for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Detection and Interpretation Time

被引:4
|
作者
Park, Eun Kyung [1 ]
Kwak, SooYoung [1 ]
Lee, Weonsuk [1 ]
Choi, Joon Suk [1 ]
Kooi, Thijs [1 ]
Kim, Eun-Kyung [2 ]
机构
[1] Lunit, 374 Gangnam Daero, Seoul 06241, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Yongin Severance Hosp, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Yongin, South Korea
关键词
COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; OUTCOMES; PERFORMANCE; ACCURACY; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1148/ryai.230318
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for the diagnosis of breast cancer on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images and to investigate whether it could improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce radiologist reading time. Materials and Methods: A deep learning AI algorithm was developed and validated for DBT with retrospectively collected examinations (January 2010 to December 2021) from 14 institutions in the United States and South Korea. A multicenter reader study was performed to compare the performance of 15 radiologists (seven breast specialists, eight general radiologists) in interpreting DBT examinations in 258 women (mean age, 56 years +/- 13.41 [SD]), including 65 cancer cases, with and without the use of AI. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and reading time were evaluated. Results: The AUC for stand-alone AI performance was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.94). With AI, radiologists' AUC improved from 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.93) to 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.96) (P = .003) in the reader study. AI showed higher specificity (89.64% [95% CI: 85.34%, 93.94%]) than radiologists (77.34% [95% CI: 75.82%, 78.87%]) (P < .001). When reading with AI, radiologists' sensitivity increased from 85.44% (95% CI: 83.22%, 87.65%) to 87.69% (95% CI: 85.63%, 89.75%) (P = .04), with no evidence of a difference in specificity. Reading time decreased from 54.41 seconds (95% CI: 52.56, 56.27) without AI to 48.52 seconds (95% CI: 46.79, 50.25) with AI (P < .001). Interreader agreement measured by Fleiss kappa increased from 0.59 to 0.62. Conclusion: The AI model showed better diagnostic accuracy than radiologists in breast cancer detection, as well as reduced reading times. The concurrent use of AI in DBT interpretation could improve both accuracy and efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An Effective Method to Reduce the Interpretation Time in the Clinical Use of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Chang, Jung Min
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 297 (03) : 543 - 544
  • [32] Breast MRI, digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: Comparison of three methods for early detection of breast cancer
    Roganovic, Dragana
    Djilas, Dragana
    Vujnovic, Sasa
    Pavic, Dag
    Stojanov, Dragan
    BOSNIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 15 (04) : 64 - 68
  • [33] Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection among Women with a History of Breast Cancer
    Kim, Mi Young
    Suh, Young Jin
    An, Yeong Yi
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (10) : 1458 - 1465
  • [35] Assessing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Impact on Early Cancer Detection: Insights from Consecutive Screening
    Jogi, Annika
    Johnson, Kristin
    Wittgren, Sofia
    Sundgren, Victor
    Tomic, Hanna
    Olinder, Jakob
    Akesson, Anna
    Andersson, Ingvar
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    Bakic, Predrag R.
    RADIOLOGY, 2024, 312 (01)
  • [36] A new approach to digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening
    Nishikawa, Robert M.
    Reiser, Ingrid.
    Seifi, Payam
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2007: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1-3, 2007, 6510
  • [37] Digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening: an ethical perspective
    Rosenqvist, Simon
    Brannmark, Johan
    Dustler, Magnus
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2024, 15 (01):
  • [38] Impact of Downsampling Size and Interpretation Methods on Diagnostic Accuracy in Deep Learning Model for Breast Cancer Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images
    Inamori, Ryusei
    Kaneno, Tomofumi
    Oba, Ken
    Takaya, Eichi
    Hirahara, Daisuke
    Kobayashi, Tomoya
    Kawaguchi, Kurara
    Adachi, Maki
    Shimokawa, Daiki
    Takahashi, Kengo
    Tsunoda, Hiroko
    Ueda, Takuya
    TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2025, 265 (01):
  • [39] Digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis for detection of breast cancer in the intraoperative specimen during breast-conserving surgery
    Misugi Urano
    Norio Shiraki
    Tatsuya Kawai
    Taeko Goto
    Yumi Endo
    Nobuyasu Yoshimoto
    Tatsuya Toyama
    Yuta Shibamoto
    Breast Cancer, 2016, 23 : 706 - 711
  • [40] Deep Learning YOLO-based CAD for Breast Cancer Detection in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Yeh, Jinn-Yi
    Chan, Siwa
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2020, 126 : 40 - 41