Impact of AI for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Detection and Interpretation Time

被引:4
|
作者
Park, Eun Kyung [1 ]
Kwak, SooYoung [1 ]
Lee, Weonsuk [1 ]
Choi, Joon Suk [1 ]
Kooi, Thijs [1 ]
Kim, Eun-Kyung [2 ]
机构
[1] Lunit, 374 Gangnam Daero, Seoul 06241, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Yongin Severance Hosp, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Yongin, South Korea
关键词
COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; OUTCOMES; PERFORMANCE; ACCURACY; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1148/ryai.230318
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for the diagnosis of breast cancer on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images and to investigate whether it could improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce radiologist reading time. Materials and Methods: A deep learning AI algorithm was developed and validated for DBT with retrospectively collected examinations (January 2010 to December 2021) from 14 institutions in the United States and South Korea. A multicenter reader study was performed to compare the performance of 15 radiologists (seven breast specialists, eight general radiologists) in interpreting DBT examinations in 258 women (mean age, 56 years +/- 13.41 [SD]), including 65 cancer cases, with and without the use of AI. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and reading time were evaluated. Results: The AUC for stand-alone AI performance was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.94). With AI, radiologists' AUC improved from 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.93) to 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.96) (P = .003) in the reader study. AI showed higher specificity (89.64% [95% CI: 85.34%, 93.94%]) than radiologists (77.34% [95% CI: 75.82%, 78.87%]) (P < .001). When reading with AI, radiologists' sensitivity increased from 85.44% (95% CI: 83.22%, 87.65%) to 87.69% (95% CI: 85.63%, 89.75%) (P = .04), with no evidence of a difference in specificity. Reading time decreased from 54.41 seconds (95% CI: 52.56, 56.27) without AI to 48.52 seconds (95% CI: 46.79, 50.25) with AI (P < .001). Interreader agreement measured by Fleiss kappa increased from 0.59 to 0.62. Conclusion: The AI model showed better diagnostic accuracy than radiologists in breast cancer detection, as well as reduced reading times. The concurrent use of AI in DBT interpretation could improve both accuracy and efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The impact of breast structure on lesion detection in breast tomosynthesis
    Kiarashi, Nooshin
    Nolte, Loren W.
    Lo, Joseph Y.
    Segars, William P.
    Ghate, Sujata V.
    Samei, Ehsan
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2015: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2015, 9412
  • [22] Effect of radiologists' experience on breast cancer detection and localization using digital breast tomosynthesis
    Alakhras, Maram M.
    Brennan, Patrick C.
    Rickard, Mary
    Bourne, Roger
    Mello-Thoms, Claudia
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (02) : 402 - 409
  • [23] Budget impact analysis of introducing digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening in Italy
    Djuric, Olivera
    Deandrea, Silvia
    Mantellini, Paola
    Sardanelli, Francesco
    Venturelli, Francesco
    Montemezzi, Stefania
    Vecchio, Riccardo
    Bucchi, Lauro
    Senore, Carlo
    Giordano, Livia
    Paci, Eugenio
    Bonifacino, Adriana
    Calabrese, Massimo
    Caumo, Francesca
    Degrassi, Flori
    de' Bianchi, Priscilla Sassoli
    Battisti, Francesca
    Zappa, Marco
    Pattacini, Pierpaolo
    Campari, Cinzia
    Nitrosi, Andrea
    Di Leo, Giovanni
    Frigerio, Alfonso
    Magni, Veronica
    Fornasa, Francesca
    Romanucci, Giovanna
    Falini, Patrizia
    Auzzi, Noemi
    Armaroli, Paola
    Giorgi Rossi, Paolo
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2024, 129 (09): : 1288 - 1302
  • [24] Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion
    Dibble, Elizabeth H.
    Lourenco, Ana P.
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Ward, Robert C.
    Maynard, A. Stanley
    Mainiero, Martha B.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [25] Breast cancer detection using machine learning in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: A systematic review
    A. Malliori
    N. Pallikarakis
    Health and Technology, 2022, 12 : 893 - 910
  • [26] Detection Rates for Benign and Malignant Diagnoses on Breast Cancer Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in a Statewide Mammography Registry Study
    Fujii, Mayo H.
    Herschorn, Sally D.
    Sowden, Michelle
    Hotaling, Elise L.
    Vacek, Pamela M.
    Weaver, Donald L.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 212 (03) : 706 - 711
  • [27] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    不详
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 121 (06) : 1415 - 1417
  • [28] Breast Cancer Screening Using Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging by Breast Density
    Stout, Natasha K.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Su, Yu-Ru
    Lee, Christoph I.
    Abraham, Linn
    Alagoz, Oguzhan
    de Koning, Harry J.
    Hampton, John M.
    Henderson, Louise
    Lowry, Kathryn P.
    Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.
    Onega, Tracy
    Schechter, Clyde B.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Stein, Sarah
    Trentham-Dietz, Amy
    van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T.
    Wernli, Karen J.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 184 (10) : 1222 - 1231
  • [29] Assessment of Radiologist Performance in Breast Cancer Screening Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Coley, R. Yates
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Rauscher, Garth H.
    Henderson, Louise M.
    Onega, Tracy
    Lee, Christoph, I
    Herschorn, Sally D.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (03) : E201759
  • [30] Impact of Artificial Intelligence Decision Support Using Deep Learning on Breast Cancer Screening Interpretation with Single-View Wide-Angle Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Pinto, Marta C.
    Rodriguez-Ruiz, Alejandro
    Pedersen, Kristin
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Wicklein, Julia
    Kappler, Steffen
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Sechopoulos, Ioannis
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 300 (03) : 529 - 536