Impact of AI for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Detection and Interpretation Time

被引:4
|
作者
Park, Eun Kyung [1 ]
Kwak, SooYoung [1 ]
Lee, Weonsuk [1 ]
Choi, Joon Suk [1 ]
Kooi, Thijs [1 ]
Kim, Eun-Kyung [2 ]
机构
[1] Lunit, 374 Gangnam Daero, Seoul 06241, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Yongin Severance Hosp, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Yongin, South Korea
关键词
COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; OUTCOMES; PERFORMANCE; ACCURACY; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1148/ryai.230318
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for the diagnosis of breast cancer on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images and to investigate whether it could improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce radiologist reading time. Materials and Methods: A deep learning AI algorithm was developed and validated for DBT with retrospectively collected examinations (January 2010 to December 2021) from 14 institutions in the United States and South Korea. A multicenter reader study was performed to compare the performance of 15 radiologists (seven breast specialists, eight general radiologists) in interpreting DBT examinations in 258 women (mean age, 56 years +/- 13.41 [SD]), including 65 cancer cases, with and without the use of AI. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and reading time were evaluated. Results: The AUC for stand-alone AI performance was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.94). With AI, radiologists' AUC improved from 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.93) to 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.96) (P = .003) in the reader study. AI showed higher specificity (89.64% [95% CI: 85.34%, 93.94%]) than radiologists (77.34% [95% CI: 75.82%, 78.87%]) (P < .001). When reading with AI, radiologists' sensitivity increased from 85.44% (95% CI: 83.22%, 87.65%) to 87.69% (95% CI: 85.63%, 89.75%) (P = .04), with no evidence of a difference in specificity. Reading time decreased from 54.41 seconds (95% CI: 52.56, 56.27) without AI to 48.52 seconds (95% CI: 46.79, 50.25) with AI (P < .001). Interreader agreement measured by Fleiss kappa increased from 0.59 to 0.62. Conclusion: The AI model showed better diagnostic accuracy than radiologists in breast cancer detection, as well as reduced reading times. The concurrent use of AI in DBT interpretation could improve both accuracy and efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of a Categorical AI System for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Interpretation by Both General Radiologists and Breast Imaging Specialists
    Kim, Jiye G.
    Haslam, Bryan
    Diab, Abdul Rahman
    Sakhare, Ashwin
    Grisot, Giorgia
    Lee, Hyunkwang
    Holt, Jacqueline
    Lee, Christoph I.
    Lotter, William
    Sorensen, A. Gregory
    RADIOLOGY-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 6 (02)
  • [2] Cancer Detection with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Harris, Lisa Katherine
    Mai-Tran, Vivian
    Durand, Melissa
    CURRENT RADIOLOGY REPORTS, 2020, 8 (04)
  • [3] Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: State of the art
    Sechopoulos, Ioannis
    Teuwen, Jonas
    Mann, Ritse
    SEMINARS IN CANCER BIOLOGY, 2021, 72 : 214 - 225
  • [4] Standalone AI for Breast Cancer Detection at Screening Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yoon, Jung Hyun
    Strand, Fredrik
    Baltzer, Pascal A. T.
    Conant, Emily F.
    Gilbert, Fiona J.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    Mullen, Lisa A.
    Nishikawa, Robert M.
    Sharma, Nisha
    Vejborg, Ilse
    Moy, Linda
    Mann, Ritse M.
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 307 (05)
  • [5] Breast cancer detection using machine learning in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: A systematic review
    Malliori, A.
    Pallikarakis, N.
    HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 12 (05) : 893 - 910
  • [6] Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Skaane, Per
    BREAST, 2013, 22 (02) : 101 - 108
  • [7] AI-enhanced Mammography With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection: Clinical Value and Comparison With Human Performance
    Resch, Daphne
    Lo Gullo, Roberto
    Teuwen, Jonas
    Semturs, Friedrich
    Hummel, Johann
    Resch, Alexandra
    Pinker, Katja
    RADIOLOGY-IMAGING CANCER, 2024, 6 (04):
  • [8] Clinical Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Conant, Emily F.
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 52 (03) : 499 - +
  • [9] Applying deep learning in digital breast tomosynthesis for automatic breast cancer detection: A review
    Bai, Jun
    Posner, Russell
    Wang, Tianyu
    Yang, Clifford
    Nabavi, Sheida
    MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2021, 71
  • [10] Breast Cancer: Computer-aided Detection with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Morra, Lia
    Sacchetto, Daniela
    Durando, Manuela
    Agliozzo, Silvano
    Carbonaro, Luca Alessandro
    Delsanto, Silvia
    Pesce, Barbara
    Persano, Diego
    Mariscotti, Giovanna
    Marra, Vincenzo
    Fonio, Paolo
    Bert, Alberto
    RADIOLOGY, 2015, 277 (01) : 56 - 63