Diagnostic performance of CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 in non-cirrhotic hepatitis C virus infection

被引:0
|
作者
Cao, Jennie J. [2 ]
Shon, Andy [1 ]
Yoon, Luke [1 ]
Kamaya, Aya [1 ]
Tse, Justin R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Hepatitis C virus; LI-RADS; Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-024-04589-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of LI-RADS among patients with non-cirrhotic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.MethodsThis retrospective, IRB-approved, single-center study included 66 observations from 43 adult patients (11 women, 32 men; median age 65 years). All patients received liver protocol CT or MRI from 2010 to 2023, had HCV, and did not have cirrhosis based on histopathology. Three board-certified abdominal radiologists blinded to histopathology and imaging follow-up assessed each observation for major features and final LI-RADS category, and inter-reader agreements with weighted kappa were calculated. The positive predictive value, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of in diagnosing HCC and overall malignancy was calculated.ResultsOf the 66 observations, 53 (80%) were malignant and 13 (20%) were benign. Positive predictive value for HCC was 0-0% for LR-1, 0-0% for LR-2, 0-33% for LR-3, 57-100% for LR-4, 98-100% for LR-5, 25-50% for LR-M, and 83-100% for LR-TIV. Positive predictive value for overall malignancy was 0-0% for LR-1, 0-0% for LR-2, 0-33% for LR-3, 57-100% for LR-4, 98-100% for LR-5, 100-100% for LR-M, and 100-100% for LR-TIV. For LR-5 in identifying HCC, sensitivity ranged from 74 to 90%, specificity from 94 to 100%, and accuracy from 80 to 91%. For the composite of LR-5, LR-M, or LR-TIV in identifying overall malignancy, sensitivity was 87-98%, specificity was 92-100%, and accuracy was 89-97%. The inter-reader agreement for major features varied from moderate to substantial, with substantial agreement for the final category.ConclusionCT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 criteria can be applied to non-cirrhotic HCV patients with near-perfect specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:1615 / 1623
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diagnosis of Non-Hepatocellular Carcinoma Malignancies in Patients With Risks for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: CEUS LI-RADS Versus CT/MRI LI-RADS
    Hu, Yi-Xin
    Shen, Jing-Xian
    Han, Jing
    Mao, Si-Yue
    Mao, Ru-Shuang
    Li, Qing
    Li, Fei
    Guo, Zhi-Xing
    Zhou, Jian-Hua
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [42] A gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI-based model using LI-RADS v2018 features for preoperatively predicting Ki-67 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Yingying Liang
    Fan Xu
    Qiuju Mou
    Zihua Wang
    Chuyin Xiao
    Tingwen Zhou
    Nianru Zhang
    Jing Yang
    Hongzhen Wu
    BMC Medical Imaging, 24
  • [43] Utilizing a domain-specific large language model for LI-RADS v2018 categorization of free-text MRI reports: a feasibility study
    Matute-Gonzalez, Mario
    Darnell, Anna
    Comas-Cufi, Marc
    Pazo, Javier
    Soler, Alexandre
    Saborido, Belen
    Mauro, Ezequiel
    Turnes, Juan
    Forner, Alejandro
    Reig, Maria
    Rimola, Jordi
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2024, 15 (01):
  • [44] A gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI-based model using LI-RADS v2018 features for preoperatively predicting Ki-67 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Liang, Yingying
    Xu, Fan
    Mou, Qiuju
    Wang, Zihua
    Xiao, Chuyin
    Zhou, Tingwen
    Zhang, Nianru
    Yang, Jing
    Wu, Hongzhen
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [45] Diagnostic performance of ultrasonography-guided core-needle biopsy according to MRI LI-RADS diagnostic categories
    Kim, Dong Wook
    Kim, So Yeon
    Kang, Hyo Jeong
    Kang, Ji Hun
    Lee, Seung Soo
    Shim, Ju Hyun
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Shin, Yong Moon
    Byun, Jae Ho
    ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2021, 40 (03) : 387 - 397
  • [46] LI-RADS v2018 category and imaging features: inter-modality agreement between contrast-enhanced CT, gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI, and extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI
    Agnello, Francesco
    Cannella, Roberto
    Brancatelli, Giuseppe
    Galia, Massimo
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2024, 129 (11): : 1575 - 1586
  • [47] LI-RADS Version 2018 Targetoid Appearances on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Performance for the Differentiation of HCC and Non-HCC Malignancy
    Min, Ji Hye
    Lee, Min Woo
    Park, Hee Sun
    Lee, Dong Ho
    Park, Hyun Jeong
    Lee, Ji Eun
    Park, Sae-Jin
    Kim, Seung-Seob
    Park, Seung Hyun
    Ha, Sang Yun
    Hwang, Jeong Ah
    Cha, Dong Ik
    Park, Boram
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 219 (03) : 421 - 432
  • [48] Diagnostic Performance of 2018 KLCA-NCC Practice Guideline for Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B or Cirrhosis: Comparison with LI-RADS Version 2018
    Lee, Sang Min
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Ahn, Su Joa
    Kang, Hyo-Jin
    Yang, Hyun Kyung
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (07) : 1066 - 1076
  • [49] Hepatitis C Virus-Associated Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Non-cirrhotic Patients
    Mazen Albeldawi
    Mohamed Soliman
    Rocio Lopez
    Nizar N. Zein
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2012, 57 : 3265 - 3270
  • [50] Effect of combining serum alpha-fetoprotein with LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis and prognostication of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Kim, Dong Hwan
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Koo, Boyeon
    Choi, Se Jin
    Jang, Hyeon Ji
    Heo, Subin
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Yong Moon
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2025,