Diagnostic performance of CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 in non-cirrhotic hepatitis C virus infection

被引:0
|
作者
Cao, Jennie J. [2 ]
Shon, Andy [1 ]
Yoon, Luke [1 ]
Kamaya, Aya [1 ]
Tse, Justin R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Hepatitis C virus; LI-RADS; Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-024-04589-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of LI-RADS among patients with non-cirrhotic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.MethodsThis retrospective, IRB-approved, single-center study included 66 observations from 43 adult patients (11 women, 32 men; median age 65 years). All patients received liver protocol CT or MRI from 2010 to 2023, had HCV, and did not have cirrhosis based on histopathology. Three board-certified abdominal radiologists blinded to histopathology and imaging follow-up assessed each observation for major features and final LI-RADS category, and inter-reader agreements with weighted kappa were calculated. The positive predictive value, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of in diagnosing HCC and overall malignancy was calculated.ResultsOf the 66 observations, 53 (80%) were malignant and 13 (20%) were benign. Positive predictive value for HCC was 0-0% for LR-1, 0-0% for LR-2, 0-33% for LR-3, 57-100% for LR-4, 98-100% for LR-5, 25-50% for LR-M, and 83-100% for LR-TIV. Positive predictive value for overall malignancy was 0-0% for LR-1, 0-0% for LR-2, 0-33% for LR-3, 57-100% for LR-4, 98-100% for LR-5, 100-100% for LR-M, and 100-100% for LR-TIV. For LR-5 in identifying HCC, sensitivity ranged from 74 to 90%, specificity from 94 to 100%, and accuracy from 80 to 91%. For the composite of LR-5, LR-M, or LR-TIV in identifying overall malignancy, sensitivity was 87-98%, specificity was 92-100%, and accuracy was 89-97%. The inter-reader agreement for major features varied from moderate to substantial, with substantial agreement for the final category.ConclusionCT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 criteria can be applied to non-cirrhotic HCV patients with near-perfect specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:1615 / 1623
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diagnostic model using LI-RADS v2018 for predicting early recurrence of microvascular invasion-negative solitary hepatocellular carcinoma
    Liang, Yingying
    Han, Xiaorui
    Zhou, Tingwen
    Xiao, Chuyin
    Shi, Changzheng
    Wei, Xinhua
    Wu, Hongzhen
    CANCER IMAGING, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [22] Additional value of 10-min far-delayed phase in extracellular contrast agent-enhanced MRI for diagnostic performance of hepatocellular carcinoma based on LI-RADS v2018
    Wang, Jiahui
    Sun, Wei
    Qiu, Qiansai
    Dong, Sanyuan
    Chen, Xiaoshan
    Wang, Wentao
    Yang, Yutao
    Rao, Shengxiang
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2025, 8 (01) : 24 - 34
  • [23] Tumor in vein (LR-TIV) and liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: diagnostic features, pitfalls, prognostic and management implications
    Roberta Catania
    Kalina Chupetlovska
    Amir A. Borhani
    Ekta Maheshwari
    Alessandro Furlan
    Abdominal Radiology, 2021, 46 : 5723 - 5734
  • [24] Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS version 2018 in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from other hepatic malignancies in patients with hepatitis B virus infection
    Shao, Shuo
    Liang, Yingying
    Kuang, Sichi
    Chen, Jingbiao
    Shan, Qungang
    Yang, Hao
    Zhang, Yao
    Wang, Bin
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Wang, Jin
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    BOSNIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 20 (03) : 401 - 410
  • [25] Increasing the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for diagnosis of small (10-19 mm) HCC on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI
    Chen, Jingbiao
    Kuang, Sichi
    Zhang, Yao
    Tang, Wenjie
    Xie, Sidong
    Zhang, Linqi
    Rong, Dailin
    He, Bingjun
    Deng, Ying
    Xiao, Yuanqiang
    Shi, Wenqi
    Fowler, Kathryn
    Wang, Jin
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (04) : 1530 - 1542
  • [26] Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018 for Primary Liver Cancer in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis on Enhanced MRI
    Liu, Xinai
    Ni, Xiaoyan
    Li, Yubo
    Yang, Chun
    Wang, Yi
    Ma, Chunzheng
    Zhou, Changwu
    Lu, Xin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [27] Abbreviated-protocol screening MRI vs. complete-protocol diagnostic MRI for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: An equivalence study using LI-RADS v2018
    Khatri, Gaurav
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Ananthakrishnan, Lakshmi
    de Leon, Alberto Diaz
    Fetzer, David T.
    Leyendecker, John
    Singal, Amit G.
    Xi, Yin
    Yopp, Adam
    Yokoo, Takeshi
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 51 (02) : 415 - 425
  • [28] Can modified LI-RADS increase the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for the diagnosis of 10–19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI?
    Sidong Xie
    Yao Zhang
    Jingbiao Chen
    Ting Jiang
    Weimin Liu
    Dailin Rong
    Lin Sun
    Linqi Zhang
    Bingjun He
    Jin Wang
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 596 - 607
  • [29] Systematic training of LI-RADS CT v2018 improves interobserver agreements and performances in LR categorization for focal liver lesions
    Ba, Te
    Xu, Hui
    Yang, Da-Wei
    Wang, Zhen-Chang
    Yang, Zhenghan
    Ren, A-Hong
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 42 (05) : 476 - 486
  • [30] New strategy of LI-RADS v2018 to improve the sensitivity for small hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 3.0 cm on extracellular-contrast enhanced MRI
    Zhou, Jinhui
    Zhang, Yao
    Zhang, Jing
    Chen, Jingbiao
    Jiang, Hang
    Zhang, Linqi
    Zhong, Xi
    Zhang, Tianhui
    Chen, Lichun
    Wang, Yufeng
    Xu, Yikai
    Wang, Jin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 181