Diagnostic performance of CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 in non-cirrhotic hepatitis C virus infection

被引:0
|
作者
Cao, Jennie J. [2 ]
Shon, Andy [1 ]
Yoon, Luke [1 ]
Kamaya, Aya [1 ]
Tse, Justin R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Hepatitis C virus; LI-RADS; Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-024-04589-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of LI-RADS among patients with non-cirrhotic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.MethodsThis retrospective, IRB-approved, single-center study included 66 observations from 43 adult patients (11 women, 32 men; median age 65 years). All patients received liver protocol CT or MRI from 2010 to 2023, had HCV, and did not have cirrhosis based on histopathology. Three board-certified abdominal radiologists blinded to histopathology and imaging follow-up assessed each observation for major features and final LI-RADS category, and inter-reader agreements with weighted kappa were calculated. The positive predictive value, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of in diagnosing HCC and overall malignancy was calculated.ResultsOf the 66 observations, 53 (80%) were malignant and 13 (20%) were benign. Positive predictive value for HCC was 0-0% for LR-1, 0-0% for LR-2, 0-33% for LR-3, 57-100% for LR-4, 98-100% for LR-5, 25-50% for LR-M, and 83-100% for LR-TIV. Positive predictive value for overall malignancy was 0-0% for LR-1, 0-0% for LR-2, 0-33% for LR-3, 57-100% for LR-4, 98-100% for LR-5, 100-100% for LR-M, and 100-100% for LR-TIV. For LR-5 in identifying HCC, sensitivity ranged from 74 to 90%, specificity from 94 to 100%, and accuracy from 80 to 91%. For the composite of LR-5, LR-M, or LR-TIV in identifying overall malignancy, sensitivity was 87-98%, specificity was 92-100%, and accuracy was 89-97%. The inter-reader agreement for major features varied from moderate to substantial, with substantial agreement for the final category.ConclusionCT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 criteria can be applied to non-cirrhotic HCV patients with near-perfect specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:1615 / 1623
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic performance of CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 in non-cirrhotic steatotic liver disease
    Cao, Jennie
    Shon, Andy
    Yoon, Luke
    Kamaya, Aya
    Tse, Justin R.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (12) : 7622 - 7631
  • [2] LI-RADS v2018: a Primer and Update for Clinicians
    Kathryn J. Fowler
    Elizabeth Hecht
    Ania Z. Kielar
    Amit G. Singal
    Claude B. Sirlin
    Current Hepatology Reports, 2018, 17 (4) : 425 - 433
  • [3] CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 vs. CEUS LI-RADS v2017-Can Things Be Put Together?
    Caraiani, Cosmin
    Boca, Bianca
    Bura, Vlad
    Sparchez, Zeno
    Dong, Yi
    Dietrich, Christoph
    BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2021, 10 (05):
  • [4] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018: Review of the CT/MRI Diagnostic Categories
    Kanmaniraja, Devaraju
    Dellacerra, Gary
    Holder, Justin
    Erlichman, David
    Chernyak, Victoria
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2021, 72 (01): : 142 - 149
  • [5] Suboptimal performance of LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates
    Na Eun Oh
    Sang Hyun Choi
    Sehee Kim
    Habeen Lee
    Hyeon Ji Jang
    Jae Ho Byun
    Hyung Jin Won
    Yong Moon Shin
    European Radiology, 2024, 34 : 465 - 474
  • [6] Diagnostic performance of MR for hepatocellular carcinoma based on LI-RADS v2018, compared with v2017
    Ren, A-Hong
    Zhao, Peng-Fei
    Yang, Da-Wei
    Du, Jing-Bo
    Wang, Zhen-Chang
    Yang, Zheng-Han
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 50 (03) : 746 - 755
  • [7] Automated CT LI-RADS v2018 scoring of liver observations using machine learning: A multivendor, multicentre retrospective study
    Mule, Sebastien
    Ronot, Maxime
    Ghosn, Mario
    Sartoris, Riccardo
    Corrias, Giuseppe
    Reizine, Edouard
    Morard, Vincent
    Quelever, Ronan
    Dumont, Laura
    Londono, Jorge Hernandez
    Coustaud, Nicolas
    Vilgrain, Valerie
    Luciani, Alain
    JHEP REPORTS, 2023, 5 (10)
  • [8] Suboptimal performance of LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates
    Oh, Na Eun
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Kim, Sehee
    Lee, Habeen
    Jang, Hyeon Ji
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Yong Moon
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (01) : 465 - 474
  • [9] Value of dynamic and DWI MRI in evaluation of HCC viability after TACE via LI-RADS v2018 diagnostic algorithm
    Saleh, Tamer Yousef
    Bahig, Suzan
    Shebrya, Naglaa
    Ahmed, Aya Yassin
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 50 (01)
  • [10] Diagnostic Accuracy of Single-Phase Computed Tomography Texture Analysis for Prediction of LI-RADS v2018 Category
    Puttagunta, Srikanth
    van der Pol, Christian B.
    Ferri, Melanie
    Wat, Josephine Sy
    Kulkarni, Ameya
    Carrion-Martinez, Ivan
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2020, 44 (02) : 188 - 192