Uncertainty Avoidance, Perceptions of Emergency Remote Education, and University Commitment: A Cross-Country Analysis

被引:0
作者
Donohue, Dana K. [1 ]
Bornman, Juan [2 ]
Osborne, Randall [3 ]
Tidikis, Viktoria [1 ]
Buzdar, Muhammad Ayub [4 ]
Graham, Marien A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Arizona Univ US, Dept Psychol Sci Northern, Tucson, AZ USA
[2] Univ Stellenbosch, Div Speech Language & Hearing Therapy, Stellenbosch, South Africa
[3] Texas State Univ US, Psychol, San Marcos, TX USA
[4] Allama Iqbal Open Univ, Dept Secondary Teacher Educ, Islamabad, Pakistan
[5] Univ Pretoria, Dept Early Childhood Educ, Pretoria, South Africa
关键词
Uncertainty avoidance; emergency remote education; university commitment; NATIONAL CULTURE; COVID-19; STUDENTS; VALIDATION; DIMENSIONS; ADOPTION; FIT;
D O I
10.1080/07377363.2024.2394273
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Worldwide, there were significant changes in university courses due to COVID-19. One was a rapid transition to online courses, described as emergency remote education. The purpose of this research was to examine how students' uncertainty avoidance (UA) affected their university commitment (UC) and whether their perceptions of emergency remote education (PERE) mediated this relationship. The b path of the mediation analysis (from PERE to commitment) was expected to be moderated by two variables: income and perceived quality of instruction. Students from universities in three countries (i.e., the United States (US), Pakistan, and South Africa (SA)) were assessed. The findings revealed that there were direct and indirect effects for this relationship for students from Pakistan, with a partial moderated mediation effect of perceived quality of instruction for students from Pakistan. Positive main effects of UA on UC were found for students from the United States, Pakistan, and South Africa. Potential explanations and implications for these results were explored.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Critical design factors for minimising waste in construction projects: A structural equation modelling approach
    Ajayi, Saheed O.
    Oyedele, Lukumon O.
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 137 : 302 - 313
  • [2] Alshebami A S., 2020, J. Talent Dev. Excell, V12, P2275
  • [3] Altindag DT., 2021, Is Online Education Working?, DOI DOI 10.3386/W29113
  • [4] Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Life of Higher Education Students: A Global Perspective
    Aristovnik, Aleksander
    Kerzic, Damijana
    Ravselj, Dejan
    Tomazevic, Nina
    Umek, Lan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (20) : 1 - 34
  • [5] Bacher-Hicks A., 2020, Inequality in household adaptation to schooling shocks: COVID-induced online learning engagement in real time
  • [6] Student perceptions of online and in-person microbiology laboratory experiences in undergraduate medical education
    Brockman, Ross M.
    Taylor, John M.
    Segars, Larry W.
    Selke, Veronica
    Taylor, Tracey A. H.
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2020, 25 (01):
  • [7] Cardon P., 2008, Issues in Information Systems, VIX, P103
  • [8] Student Learning in Online College Programs
    Cellini, Stephanie Riegg
    Grueso, Hernando
    [J]. AERA OPEN, 2021, 7
  • [9] Daud K.A.M., 2018, International Journal of Development and Sustainability, V7, P1026
  • [10] The College Persistence Questionnaire: Development and Validation of an Instrument That Predicts Student Attrition
    Davidson, William B.
    Beek, Hall P.
    Milligan, Meg
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COLLEGE STUDENT DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 50 (04) : 373 - 390