Comparison of ERIC carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae test, BD Phoenix CPO detect panel, and NG-test CARBA 5 for the detection of main carbapenemase types of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales

被引:1
|
作者
Lin, Yu-Tzu [1 ]
Lin, Hsiu-Hsien [2 ]
Tseng, Kun-Hao [2 ]
Lee, Tai-Fen [3 ]
Huang, Yu-Tsung [3 ]
Hsueh, Po-Ren [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Dept Med Lab Sci & Biotechnol, Taichung, Taiwan
[2] China Med Univ, China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] China Med Univ, China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Infect Dis, Taichung, Taiwan
[5] China Med Univ, China Med Univ Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Lab Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[6] China Med Univ, China Med Univ Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales; Carbapenemases; ERIC carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae test; NG-Test CARBA 5; BD Phoenix CPO detect panel; KLEBSIELLA-PNEUMONIAE; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; BETA-LACTAMASE; TAIWAN; EPIDEMIOLOGY; SURVEILLANCE; MULTICENTER; MECHANISMS; EVOLUTION; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmii.2024.05.013
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: This study aimed to assess the performance of three commercial panels, the ERIC Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Test (ERIC CRE test), the NG-Test CARBA 5 (NG CARBA 5), and the BD Phoenix CPO Detect Panel (CPO panel), for the detection of main types of carbapenemases among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). Methods: We collected 502 isolates of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) demonstrating intermediate or resistant profiles to at least one carbapenem antibiotic (ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, or doripenem). Carbapenemase genes and their specific types were identified through multiplex PCR and sequencing methods. Subsequently, the ERIC CRE test, CPO panel, and NG CARBA 5 assay were conducted on these isolates, and the results were compared with those obtained from multiplex PCR. Results: The results indicated that the ERIC CRE test exhibited an overall sensitivity and specificity of 98.1% and 93.6%, respectively, which were comparable to 99.1% and 90.6% for the NG CARBA 5. However, the CPO panel demonstrated a sensitivity of only 56.2% in identifying Ambler classes, exhibiting the poorest sensitivity for class A. Moreover, while the ERIC CRE test outperformed the NG CARBA 5 in identifying multi-gene isolates with multiple carbapenemase-encoding genes, the CPO panel failed to accurately classify these isolates. Conclusions: Our findings support the utilization of the ERIC CRE test as one of the methods for detecting carbapenemases in clinical laboratories. Nonetheless, further optimization is imperative for the CPO panel to enhance its accuracy in determining carbapenemase classification and address limitations in detecting multi-gene isolates. Copyright (c) 2024, Taiwan Society of Microbiology. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:782 / 790
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [21] QUANTITATIVE QPCR-BASED BIOBURDEN TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF CARBAPENEM-RESISTANT ENTEROBACTERIACEAE (CRE): NOVEL TEST FOR SURVEILLANCE AND RISK-STRATIFICATION
    Pannala, Rahul
    Gupta, Shradha
    Tinkasimile, Amani K.
    Vorachitti, Merica
    Faigel, Douglas O.
    Grys, Thomas E.
    LaBaer, Joshua
    Murugan, Vel
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 91 (06) : AB106 - AB107
  • [22] Impact of a Rapid Molecular Test for Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase and Ceftazidime-Avibactam Use on Outcomes After Bacteremia Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales
    Satlin, Michael J.
    Chen, Liang
    Gomez-Simmonds, Angela
    Marino, Jamie
    Weston, Gregory
    Bhowmick, Tanaya
    Seo, Susan K.
    Sperber, Steven J.
    Kim, Angela C.
    Eilertson, Brandon
    Derti, Sierra
    Jenkins, Stephen G.
    Levi, Michael H.
    Weinstein, Melvin P.
    Tang, Yi Wei
    Hong, Tao
    Juretschko, Stefan
    Hoffman, Katherine L.
    Walsh, Thomas J.
    Westblade, Lars F.
    Uhlemann, Anne Catrin
    Kreiswirth, Barry N.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 75 (12) : 2066 - 2075