"Tell Me About Your Trip": Introducing the Enhanced Ghostwriter Lie Detection Tool

被引:0
作者
Burkhardt, Jennifer [1 ]
Vrij, Aldert [1 ]
Leal, Sharon [1 ]
Deeb, Haneen [1 ]
Vernham, Zarah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Portsmouth, Dept Psychol, King Henry Bldg,King Henry 1 Str, Portsmouth PO1 2DY, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
deception; lie detection; ghostwriter method; telling it all; keeping it simple; MODEL STATEMENT; TRUTH TELLERS; CUES; INFORMATION; STRATEGIES; CBCA;
D O I
10.1037/mac0000177
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Asking interviewees to imagine talking to a ghostwriter results in more information and veracity cues than an instruction to be detailed (Leal et al., 2019). We examined reasons why the ghostwriter instruction worked: The ghostwriter determines (a) what to report/omit and (b) in which order to report the provided information. Taking away these decisions from the interviewee creates a more lenient output criterion for the interviewee of what to report. Participants discussed a trip they had made (truth tellers) or pretended to have made (lie tellers). Interviews took place under three conditions: control condition, ghostwriter condition where participants were asked to imagine talking to a ghostwriter, and enhanced ghostwriter condition where participants were also told what the benefits are of talking to a ghostwriter. The enhanced ghostwriter condition resulted in more information than the control condition. Most veracity cues emerged in the enhanced ghostwriter condition and fewest cues in the control condition.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) reality criteria in adults: A meta-analytic review
    Amado, Barbara G.
    Arce, Ramn
    Farina, Francisca
    Vilarino, Manuel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 16 (02) : 201 - 210
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, Beyond Proof, Credibility Assessment in EU Asylum Systems: Summary
  • [3] Content in Context Improves Deception Detection Accuracy
    Blair, J. Pete
    Levine, Timothy R.
    Shaw, Allison S.
    [J]. HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2010, 36 (03) : 423 - 442
  • [4] Using an Example Statement Increases Information but Does Not Increase Accuracy of CBCA, RM, and SCAN
    Bogaard, Glynis
    Meijer, Ewout H.
    Vrij, Aldert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE PSYCHOLOGY AND OFFENDER PROFILING, 2014, 11 (02) : 151 - 163
  • [5] Impacts of Psychological Science on National Security Agencies Post-9/11
    Brandon, Susan E.
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2011, 66 (06) : 495 - 506
  • [6] Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  • [7] Suspects' consistency in statements concerning two events when different question formats are used
    Deeb, Haneen
    Vrij, Aldert
    Hope, Lorraine
    Mann, Samantha
    Granhag, Par-Anders
    Lancaster, Gary L. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE PSYCHOLOGY AND OFFENDER PROFILING, 2017, 14 (01) : 74 - 87
  • [8] Cues to deception
    DePaulo, BM
    Lindsay, JJ
    Malone, BE
    Muhlenbruck, L
    Charlton, K
    Cooper, H
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2003, 129 (01) : 74 - 118
  • [9] Using the Model Statement to Elicit Information and Cues to Deceit from Native Speakers, Non-native Speakers and Those Talking Through an Interpreter
    Ewens, Sarah
    Vrij, Aldert
    Leal, Sharon
    Mann, Samantha
    Jo, Eunkyung
    Shaboltas, Alla
    Ivanova, Maria
    Granskaya, Juliana
    Houston, Kate
    [J]. APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 30 (06) : 854 - 862
  • [10] G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences
    Faul, Franz
    Erdfelder, Edgar
    Lang, Albert-Georg
    Buchner, Axel
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (02) : 175 - 191