Exergetic, economic and exergy-based sustainability analysis of a power generation system with CO2 capture and methanol production

被引:1
|
作者
Tosun, Demet Canpolat [1 ]
Acikkalp, Emin [2 ]
Altuntas, Onder [3 ]
Palmero-Marrero, Ana I. [4 ]
Zairov, Rustem [5 ,6 ]
Borge-Diez, David [7 ]
机构
[1] Eskisehir Tech Univ, Fac Aeronaut & Astronaut, Dept Avion, TR-26555 Eskisehir, Turkiye
[2] Eskisehir Tech Univ, Engn Fac, Dept Mech Engn, TR-26470 Eskisehir, Turkiye
[3] Eskisehir Tech Univ, Fac Aeronaut & Astronaut, Dept Airframe & Powerplant Maintenance, TR-26470 Eskisehir, Turkiye
[4] Inst Sci & Innovat Mech & Ind Engn INEGI, Rua Dr Roberto Frias, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
[5] Kazan Fed Univ, Aleksander Butlerov Inst Chem, 1-29 Lobachevskogo Str, Kazan 420008, Russia
[6] Russian Acad Sci, Kazan Sci Ctr, AE Arbuzov Inst Organ & Phys Chem, 8 Arbuzov Str, Kazan 420088, Russia
[7] Univ Leon, Dept Elect Syst & Automat Engn, Campus Vegazana, Leon 24071, Spain
关键词
CO; 2; capture; Methanol production; Biomass; Renewable energy; Sustainability; TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; HYDROGEN; BIOMASS; GASIFICATION; OPTIMIZATION; INTEGRATION; STORAGE; REACTORS; PLANT; SOLAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2024.07.001
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study proposes a new biomass-based Combined Heat and Power (CHP)/renewable methanol production through captured carbon dioxide. A liquid organic hydrogen carrier (LOHC) stores and releases hydrogen. Literature review shows that LOHC has been integrated into such a system for the first time. The exergetic, exergoeconomic, and economic performance are researched. On average, results show that the exergetic efficiency of the system is 6.6 %. Depletion ratio (DR) is the depletion rate of the exergy source given to the system, which is desired to have low values. The sustainability index (SI) is the DR's reverse, representing the required exergy source per exergy destruction (exergy depletion). High values of this index indicate less exergy source consumed in the system. Exergetic ecological index (EECI) compares the useful products or depleted exergy per consumed exergy source destruction. The negative value of EECI means that the depletion of the exergy source is more significant than the product exergy and vice versa. The exergy-based sustainability indices, including DR, SI, and EECI, are found as 0.934, 1.071, and -0.868, respectively. Exergoeconomic analysis reveals that the exergy destruction rate at the system's capital cost (REX) value is 0.087x102. Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG), gasifier, and Heat Exchanger 1 (HE1) are obtained as 5.153x10-2 (kW/<euro>), 1.707x10-2 (kW/<euro>), 3.094x10-2 (kW/<euro>) respectively. The payback period and the REX are 14.56 years and 0.087x10-2 (kW/<euro>), respectively; it seems long for an engineering application, but these technologies are relatively new, and their costs might decrease soon. Exergy destruction or lost power per capita, which means depleted investment, costs much less than 1. Although the thermodynamic values of the system seem low because irreversibilities occurred in chemical reactions, CO2 saved and produced methanol and cannot be ignored in terms of its environmental and economic benefits, considering CO2 taxes and the methanol economy.
引用
收藏
页码:1094 / 1108
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Typical case of CO2 capture in Chinese iron and steel enterprises: Exergy analysis
    Feng, Chao
    Zhu, Rong
    Wei, Guangsheng
    Dong, Kai
    Xia, Tao
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 336
  • [32] Techno-economic evaluation of an integrated hydrogen and power co-generation system with CO2 capture
    Zohrabian, Angineh
    Majoumerd, Mohammad Mansouri
    Soltanieh, Mohammad
    Sattari, Sourena
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2016, 44 : 94 - 103
  • [33] Modelling of a novel electricity and methanol co-generation using heat recovery and CO2 capture: Comprehensive thermodynamic, economic, and environmental analyses
    Gu, Hongfei
    Liu, Jianzi
    Zhou, Xingchen
    Wu, Qiwei
    Liu, Yaodong
    Yu, Shuaixian
    Qiu, Wenying
    Xu, Jianguo
    ENERGY, 2023, 278
  • [34] CO2 Capture in a Chemical Looping Combustion Power Plant Evaluated With an Advanced Exergetic Analysis
    Petrakopoulou, Fontina
    Tsatsaronis, George
    Morosuk, Tatiana
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2014, 33 (03) : 1017 - 1025
  • [35] Thermo-economic analysis of a direct supercritical CO2 electric power generation system using geothermal heat
    Wang, Xingchao
    Pan, Chunjian
    Romero, Carlos E.
    Qiao, Zongliang
    Banerjee, Arindam
    Rubio-Maya, Carlos
    Pan, Lehua
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY, 2022, 16 (02) : 246 - 262
  • [36] Sustainability Enhancement of Fossil-Fueled Power Plants by Optimal Design and Operation of Membrane-Based CO2 Capture Process
    Asadi, Javad
    Kazempoor, Pejman
    ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (10)
  • [37] Technico-economic assessment of coal and sawdust co-firing power generation with CO2 capture
    Fogarasi, Szabolcs
    Cormos, Calin-Cristian
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 103 : 140 - 148
  • [38] Sustainability evaluation of biomass direct gasification using chemical looping technology for power generation with and w/o CO2 capture
    Mohamed, Usama
    Zhao, Yingjie
    Huang, Yi
    Cui, Yang
    Shi, Lijuan
    Li, Congming
    Pourkashanian, Mohamed
    Wei, Guoqiang
    Yi, Qun
    Nimmo, William
    ENERGY, 2020, 205
  • [39] A power generation system with integrated supercritical water gasification of coal and CO2 capture
    Chen, Zhewen
    Zhang, Xiaosong
    Han, Wei
    Gao, Lin
    Li, Sheng
    ENERGY, 2018, 142 : 723 - 730
  • [40] A comprehensive thermo-enviro-economic assessments of a novel geothermal-based multigeneration process: Integrating power generation, hydrogen production, CO2 capture, and absorption cooling
    He, Rui
    Huang, Lu
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 380