Use of genetic correlations to examine selection bias

被引:0
|
作者
Shapland, Chin Yang [1 ,2 ]
Gkatzionis, Apostolos [1 ,2 ]
Hemani, Gibran [1 ,2 ]
Tilling, Kate [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, MRC Integrat Epidemiol Unit, Bristol, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
correlation; covariance; selection bias; SAMPLE TESTS; RISK; ASSOCIATIONS; PLEIOTROPY; EQUALITY;
D O I
10.1002/gepi.22584
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Observational studies are rarely representative of their target population because there are known and unknown factors that affect an individual's choice to participate (the selection mechanism). Selection can cause bias in a given analysis if the outcome is related to selection (conditional on the other variables in the model). Detecting and adjusting for selection bias in practice typically requires access to data on nonselected individuals. Here, we propose methods to detect selection bias in genetic studies by comparing correlations among genetic variants in the selected sample to those expected under no selection. We examine the use of four hypothesis tests to identify induced associations between genetic variants in the selected sample. We evaluate these approaches in Monte Carlo simulations. Finally, we use these approaches in an applied example using data from the UK Biobank (UKBB). The proposed tests suggested an association between alcohol consumption and selection into UKBB. Hence, UKBB analyses with alcohol consumption as the exposure or outcome may be biased by this selection.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Religious attendance after elevated depressive symptoms: is selection bias at work?
    Balbuena, Lloyd
    Baetz, Marilyn
    Bowen, Rudy
    PEERJ, 2014, 2
  • [42] Physical activity and premenopausal breast cancer: an examination of recall and selection bias
    Maruti, Sonia S.
    Willett, Walter C.
    Feskanich, Diane
    Levine, Beverly
    Rosner, Bernard
    Colditz, Graham A.
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2009, 20 (05) : 549 - 558
  • [43] Self-selection and bias in a large prospective pregnancy cohort in Norway
    Nilsen, Roy M.
    Vollset, Stein Emil
    Gjessing, Hakon K.
    Skjaerven, Rolv
    Melve, Kari K.
    Schreuder, Patricia
    Alsaker, Elin R.
    Haug, Kjell
    Daltveit, Anne Kjersti
    Magnus, Per
    PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 23 (06) : 597 - 608
  • [44] Assessing and attenuating the impact of selection bias on spatial cluster detection studies
    Boyle, Joseph
    Ward, Mary H.
    Cerhan, James R.
    Rothman, Nathaniel
    Wheeler, David C.
    SPATIAL AND SPATIO-TEMPORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 49
  • [45] The Importance of Covariate Selection in Controlling for Selection Bias in Observational Studies
    Steiner, Peter M.
    Cook, Thomas D.
    Shadish, William R.
    Clark, M. H.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2010, 15 (03) : 250 - 267
  • [46] Selection bias and subject refusal in a cluster-randomized controlled trial
    Yang, Rochelle
    Carter, Barry L.
    Gums, Tyler H.
    Gryzlak, Brian M.
    Xu, Yinghui
    Levy, Barcey T.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [47] Using instruments for selection to adjust for selection bias in Mendelian randomization
    Gkatzionis, Apostolos
    Tchetgen, Eric J. Tchetgen
    Heron, Jon
    Northstone, Kate
    Tilling, Kate
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 43 (22) : 4250 - 4271
  • [48] Risk of selection bias in randomised trials
    Kahan, Brennan C.
    Rehal, Sunita
    Cro, Suzie
    TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [49] Response: Selection bias in cohorts of cases
    Hamer, Mark
    Stamatakis, Emmanuel
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 57 (03) : 249 - 249
  • [50] Introduction to randomized trials: Selection bias
    Simon, E. G.
    Fouche, C. J.
    Perrotin, F.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2011, 39 (11): : 667 - 668