Reducing financial toxicity in bladder cancer care

被引:0
作者
Kurnot, Jeremy A. [1 ]
Kaye, Deborah R. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Urol, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ, Duke Margolis Ctr Publ Policy, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Canc Inst, Durham, NC USA
[4] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
direct costs; financial toxicity; indirect costs; objective financial toxicity; subjective financial toxicity; COST; HEXAMINOLEVULINATE; COMMUNICATION; CYSTOSCOPY;
D O I
10.1097/MOU.0000000000001218
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose of reviewFinancial toxicity is a significant concern for many individuals with bladder cancer, which is, overall, the most expensive malignancy, per patient. Financial toxicity, defined as the harmful effects of treatment costs on an individual's quality of life, is associated with worse outcomes and decreased quality of life. Awareness of the objective and subjective factors that contribute to financial toxicity, and ways to mitigate their effects on patients, is essential to reduce the burden of bladder cancer care. This commentary aims to discuss the elements contributing to financial toxicity amongst bladder cancer patients, identify at-risk populations, and review current and potential strategies for mitigating financial burden.Recent findingsBladder cancer is becoming more expensive as the use of novel therapies increases. Early data suggest how some of these novel treatments or changes in treatment delivery may impact costs. Potential innovative strategies for cost reduction include blue light cystoscopy, intravesical gemcitabine-docetaxel rather than BCG for high-risk nonmuscle-invasive patients, home BCG therapy, and surveillance guideline optimization. However, there is still much work to be done on the potential impacts of these treatment on financial toxicity. While there is a paucity of data on treatment changes to reduce financial toxicity, and cost data can be hard to access, clinicians can still reduce the financial burden of cancer care. Awareness, financial toxicity screening, cost communication, and/or early referral to financial navigators or other similar resources have the potential to reduce financial burden. Despite mounting evidence, these tools/techniques are largely underutilized.SummaryMany individuals with bladder cancer face significant financial toxicity, with the potential for this to worsen in the setting of rising treatment costs. Novel diagnostic and treatment modifications may reduce financial toxicity. However, awareness, screening, cost discussions, and utilization of financial navigators are tools/techniques that are currently available and should be used to reduce financial burden.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 488
页数:5
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Patient-physician communication about out-of-pocket costs [J].
Alexander, GC ;
Casalino, LP ;
Meltzer, DO .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (07) :953-958
[2]   Financial Hardships Experienced by Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review [J].
Altice, Cheryl K. ;
Banegas, Matthew P. ;
Tucker-Seeley, Reginald D. ;
Yabroff, K. Robin .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2017, 109 (02)
[3]   Physician Experience and Attitudes Toward Addressing the Cost of Cancer Care [J].
Altomare, Ivy ;
Irwin, Blair ;
Zafar, Syed Yousuf ;
Houck, Kevin ;
Maloney, Bailey ;
Greenup, Rachel ;
Peppercorn, Jeffrey .
JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2016, 12 (03) :E281-E288
[4]  
Aly Abdalla, 2020, J Clin Pathw, V6, P51
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2021, KEY STAT BLADDER CAN
[6]   Clinical model of lifetime cost of treating bladder cancer and associated complications [J].
Avritscher, Elenir B. C. ;
Cooksley, Catherine D. ;
Grossman, H. Barton ;
Sabichi, Anita L. ;
Hamblin, Lois ;
Dinney, Colin P. ;
Elting, Linda S. .
UROLOGY, 2006, 68 (03) :549-553
[7]  
BenefitsCheckUp, BenefitsCheckUp
[8]   Patient-Oncologist Cost Communication, Financial Distress, and Medication Adherence [J].
Bestvina, Christine M. ;
Zullig, Leah L. ;
Rushing, Christel ;
Chino, Fumiko ;
Samsa, Gregory P. ;
Altomare, Ivy ;
Tulsky, James ;
Ubel, Peter ;
Schrag, Deborah ;
Nicolla, Jon ;
Abernethy, Amy P. ;
Peppercorn, Jeffrey ;
Zafar, S. Yousuf .
JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2014, 10 (03) :162-+
[9]   Financial Toxicity Among Patients with Prostate, Bladder, and Kidney Cancer: A Systematic Review and Call to Action [J].
Bhanvadia, Sumeet K. ;
Psutka, Sarah P. ;
Burg, Madeleine L. ;
de Wit, Ronald ;
Dhillon, Haryana M. ;
Gyawali, Bishal ;
Morgans, Alicia K. ;
Goldstein, Daniel A. ;
Smith, Angela B. ;
Sun, Maxine ;
Penson, David F. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2021, 4 (03) :396-404
[10]   Time to add screening for financial hardship as a quality measure? [J].
Bradley, Cathy J. ;
Yabroff, K. Robin ;
Zafar, S. Yousuf ;
Shih, Ya-Chen Tina .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2021, 71 (02) :100-106