Parameterized Inapproximability Hypothesis under Exponential Time Hypothesis

被引:0
|
作者
Guruswami, Venkatesan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lin, Bingkai [4 ]
Ren, Xuandi [2 ]
Sun, Yican [5 ]
Wu, Kewen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Simons Inst Theory Comp, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept EECS, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Math, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Nanjing Univ, State Key Lab Novel Software Technol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Fixed-parameter algorithms and complexity; Hardness of approximations; PCP theorems; APPROXIMATION; COMPLEXITY; HARDNESS; SATISFIABILITY; COMPLETENESS; TRACTABILITY; PROOFS; PCPS;
D O I
10.1145/3618260.3649771
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The Parameterized Inapproximability Hypothesis (PIH) asserts that no fixed parameter tractable (FPT) algorithm can distinguish a satisfiable CSP instance, parameterized by the number of variables, from one where every assignment fails to satisfy an Y fraction of constraints for some absolute constant epsilon > 0. PIH plays the role of the PCP theorem in parameterized complexity. However, PIH has only been established under Gap-ETH, a very strong assumption with an inherent gap. In this work, we prove PIH under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). This is the first proof of PIH from a gap-free assumption. Our proof is self-contained and elementary. We identify an ETH-hard CSP whose variables take vector values, and constraints are either linear or of a special parallel structure. Both kinds of constraints can be checked with constant soundness via a "parallel PCP of proximity" based on the Walsh-Hadamard code.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 35
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Parameterized Inapproximability of Target Set Selection and Generalizations
    Bazgan, Cristina
    Chopin, Morgan
    Nichterlein, Andre
    Sikora, Florian
    COMPUTABILITY-THE JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION CIE, 2014, 3 (02): : 135 - 145
  • [32] ESTIMATION AND HYPOTHESIS TESTING FOR PARAMETERS OF A BIVARIATE EXPONENTIAL DISTRIBUTION
    BEMIS, BM
    BAIN, LJ
    HIGGINS, JJ
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1972, 67 (340) : 927 - 929
  • [33] Somatomedin hypothesis: Time for reexamination
    Kaplan, SA
    ENDOCRINOLOGIST, 2001, 11 (06): : 470 - 473
  • [34] Comments on "Physiological time: A hypothesis"
    Grigolini, Paolo
    PHYSICS OF LIFE REVIEWS, 2013, 10 (02) : 225 - 226
  • [35] The Cholesterol hypothesis: Time for the obituary?
    Schersten, Tore
    Rosch, Paul J.
    Arfors, Karl E.
    Sundberg, Ralf
    SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 2011, 45 (06) : 322 - 323
  • [36] A FRAMEWORK FOR EXPONENTIAL-TIME-HYPOTHESIS-TIGHT ALGORITHMS AND LOWER BOUNDS IN GEOMETRIC INTERSECTION GRAPHS
    de Berg, Mark
    Bodlaender, Hans L.
    Kisfaludi-Bak, Sandor
    Marx, Daniel
    van der Zanden, Tom C.
    SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2020, 49 (06) : 1291 - 1331
  • [37] Parameterized lower bound and inapproximability of polylogarithmic string barcoding
    Chunmei Liu
    Yinglei Song
    Legand L. Burge
    Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 2008, 16 : 39 - 49
  • [38] HYPOTHESIS OF QUANTIZED PARTICLE LIFETIMES REEXAMINED, AND ITS CONNECTION WITH HYPOTHESIS OF QUANTIZED TIME
    EHRLICH, R
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1977, 15 (03): : 929 - 930
  • [39] Change is time A comment on "Physiologic time: A hypothesis"
    Holden, John G.
    Ma, Tao
    Serota, Rostislav A.
    PHYSICS OF LIFE REVIEWS, 2013, 10 (02) : 231 - 232
  • [40] The direction of time and Boltzmann's time hypothesis
    Klimenko, A. Y.
    PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 2019, 94 (03)