Evaluation of lateral stiffness of steel structures having different types of lateral load- resisting systems

被引:0
|
作者
Sadeghi, Kabir [1 ]
Nabi, Krekar Kadir [2 ]
Nouban, Fatemeh [1 ]
机构
[1] Near East Univ, Civil Engn Dept, Near East Blvd,Via Mersin, TR-99138 North Cyprus, Turkiye
[2] Ishik Univ, Civil Engn Dept, Filkey Baz Sq, Erbil 44001, Iraq
关键词
bracing; lateral load-resisting systems; lateral stiffness; pushover analysis; shear wall; FRAME;
D O I
10.12989/acd.2024.9.3.151
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In this paper, the evaluation of the elastic lateral stiffness factor (ELSF) of steel frames for different lateral load-resisting systems (LLRSs) is presented. First, 720 steel structural frame models have been analyzed and designed using the equivalent lateral force method. Then by using pushover analysis method, all models have been analyzed, compared and evaluated. Finally, the effects of a number of influenced parameters such as different types of LLRSs, span length, number of stories, number of spans as well as story height of the buildings on the lateral stiffness are assessed and by applying regression analysis some useful equations were submitted. Based on the results obtained for steel frames having different LLRSs, compared to ordinary moment-resisting frames (OMRFs) as a base (having ELSF of 1), the normalized average ELSFs of K-eccentrically braced-frames (K-EBFs), V-, Z-, inverted V-, X-braced-frames, shear walls with thickness of 25 cm (SW25) and shear walls with thickness of 30 cm (SW30) are about 2.2, 6, 7, 9, 11, 95, 155, respectively. Among the braced-frames, X-braced-frames have the maximum ELSF, about 10 times more than OMRF, while OMRFs provide the minimum ELSFs among all LLRSs, and the frames supported by shear walls have ELSFs about 100 to 150 times more than OMRFs.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 165
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation and story drift ratio limits of structures with separated gravity- and lateral-load-resisting systems using pushover analysis
    Peng, Wei-Jie
    Li, Zi-Ang
    Tao, Mu-Xuan
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 76
  • [22] Numerical comparison of truss-shaped lateral load-resisting systems with conventional steel shear walls
    Moeinifard, Pouya
    Azad, Amir Reza Ghiami
    Mirghaderi, Seyed Rasoul
    STRUCTURES, 2024, 62
  • [23] Lateral displacement of different types of steel sleepers on ballasted track
    Jing, Guoqing
    Fu, Hao
    Aela, Peyman
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2018, 186 : 1268 - 1275
  • [24] An analytical matrix approach for the prediction of the elastic lateral displacements of CLT platform-type lateral load resisting systems
    Casagrande, Daniele
    D'Arenzo, Giuseppe
    Masroor, Mohammad
    Gavric, Igor
    Doudak, Ghasan
    STRUCTURES, 2024, 64
  • [25] Lateral force resisting systems in lightweight steel frames: Recent research advances
    Sharafi, Pezhman
    Mortazavi, Mina
    Usefi, Nima
    Kildashti, Kamyar
    Ronagh, Hamid
    Samali, Bijan
    THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES, 2018, 130 : 231 - 253
  • [26] Reversed optimal control approach for seismic retrofitting of inelastic lateral load resisting systems
    Shmerling, Assaf
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DYNAMICS AND CONTROL, 2022, 10 (06) : 2034 - 2052
  • [27] Lateral load resisting behavior of steel moment frames with reduced web section (RWS) beams
    Erfani, Saeed
    Akrami, Vahid
    Mohammad-nejad, Arash
    STRUCTURES, 2020, 28 : 251 - 265
  • [28] Reversed optimal control approach for seismic retrofitting of inelastic lateral load resisting systems
    Assaf Shmerling
    International Journal of Dynamics and Control, 2022, 10 : 2034 - 2052
  • [29] Economic implication of selecting lateral load resisting systems for earthquake resistant concrete building
    Vasanwala, Sandip A.
    Patel, Hasit J.
    Indian Concrete Journal, 2011, 85 (07): : 32 - 38
  • [30] More efficient lateral load patterns for seismic design of steel moment-resisting frames
    Moghaddam, Hassan
    Gelekolai, Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini
    Hajirasouliha, Iman
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-STRUCTURES AND BUILDINGS, 2018, 171 (06) : 487 - 502