Greenhouse gas emissions and drivers of the global warming potential of vineyards under different irrigation and fertilizer management practices

被引:1
|
作者
Peng, Xuelian [1 ]
Chen, Dianyu [1 ]
Zhen, Jingbo [1 ]
Wang, Yakun [1 ]
Hu, Xiaotao [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwest A&F Univ, Key Lab Agr Soil & Water Engn Arid & Semiarid Area, Minist Educ, Xianyang 712100, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Grape yield; Drip fertigation; Greenhouse gases emission; Global warming potential; REGULATED DEFICIT IRRIGATION; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSION; DRIP FERTIGATION; N2O EMISSIONS; CROPPING SYSTEMS; SOIL; YIELD; MITIGATION; IMPACT; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175447
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the context of global warming and low water and fertilizer utilization efficiency in vineyards, identifying the driving factors of global warming potential (GWP) and proper irrigation and fertilization management strategies are crucial for high grape yields and emission reduction. In this experiment, drip fertigation technology was used, including three irrigation levels (W3 (100% M, where M is the irrigation quota), W2 (75% M) and W1 (50% M)) and four fertilization levels (F3 (648 kg hm-2), F2 (486 kg hm-2), F1 (324 kg hm-2) and F0 (0 kg hm-2)). Traditional furrow irrigation and fertilization (CG) and rainfed (CK) treatments were used as control treatments. The results indicated that under the drip fertigation system, fertilization significantly increased the grape leaf chlorophyll relative content (SPAD) and leaf area index (LAI) within a fertilizer application of 0-486 kg hm-2. Irrigation primarily had a direct positive effect on the water-filled pore space (WFPS) in the 0-60 cm soil layer, and the residual soil nutrient content was mainly affected by fertilization. The vital stage for reducing greenhouse gas emissions was the fruit-inflating and fruit-rendering stages. The CG treatment not only failed to ensure high grape yield but also adversely affected the soil environment and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the vineyard. Fertilization had a direct positive effect on the grape SPAD, LAI, yield, and soil residual nutrient content. GWP was primarily directly driven by SPAD, WFPS, and soil residual nutrient content, while grape yield was primarily directly driven by fertilization and SPAD. In conclusion, the W2F2 treatment (25 % reduced irrigation and 486 kg hm-2 of fertilization) of drip fertigation in the vineyard was the preferred irrigation and fertilizer management strategy for maintaining good vine vigor and balancing grape yield and environmental benefits.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Aeration of different irrigation levels affects net global warming potential and carbon footprint for greenhouse tomato systems
    Chen, Hui
    Hou, Huijing
    Hu, Hongwei
    Shang, Zihui
    Zhu, Yan
    Cai, Huanjie
    Qaisar, Saddique
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2018, 242 : 10 - 19
  • [42] Research on how the composting process impacts greenhouse gas emissions and global warming
    Zeman, C
    Depken, D
    Rich, M
    COMPOST SCIENCE & UTILIZATION, 2002, 10 (01) : 72 - 86
  • [43] Soil carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas emissions, and water pollution under different tillage practices
    Bhattacharyya, Siddhartha Shankar
    Leite, Fernanda Figueiredo Granja Dorileo
    France, Casey L.
    Adekoya, Adetomi O.
    Ros, Gerard H.
    de Vries, Wim
    Melchor-Martinez, Elda M.
    Iqbal, Hafiz M. N.
    Parra-Saldivar, Roberto
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 826
  • [44] A global meta-analysis of crop yield and agricultural greenhouse gas emissions under nitrogen fertilizer application
    Guo, Chan
    Liu, Xufei
    He, Xuefei
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 831
  • [45] Alternatives to the global warming potential for comparing climate impacts of emissions of greenhouse gases
    Shine, KP
    Fuglestvedt, JS
    Hailemariam, K
    Stuber, N
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2005, 68 (03) : 281 - 302
  • [46] Alternatives to the Global Warming Potential for Comparing Climate Impacts of Emissions of Greenhouse Gases
    Keith P. Shine
    Jan S. Fuglestvedt
    Kinfe Hailemariam
    Nicola Stuber
    Climatic Change, 2005, 68 : 281 - 302
  • [47] Mitigation potential and costs for global agricultural greenhouse gas emissions
    Beach, Robert H.
    DeAngelo, Benjamin J.
    Rose, Steven
    Li, Changsheng
    Salas, William
    DelGrosso, Stephen J.
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 38 (02) : 109 - 115
  • [48] Global estimates of potential mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by agriculture
    C.V. Cole
    J. Duxbury
    J. Freney
    O. Heinemeyer
    K. Minami
    A. Mosier
    K. Paustian
    N. Rosenberg
    N. Sampson
    D. Sauerbeck
    Q. Zhao
    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 1997, 49 : 221 - 228
  • [49] Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Global Warming Potential in Double-Cropping Rice Fields as Influenced by Two Water-Saving Irrigation Modes in South China
    Luobu Li
    Fusheng Li
    Yanfang Dong
    Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2020, 20 : 2617 - 2630
  • [50] Global estimates of potential mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by agriculture
    Cole, CV
    Duxbury, J
    Freney, J
    Heinemeyer, O
    Minami, K
    Mosier, A
    Paustian, K
    Rosenberg, N
    Sampson, N
    Sauerbeck, D
    Zhao, Q
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 1997, 49 (1-3) : 221 - 228