Urban environmental regulation, firms' emission reduction strategies and labor demand: Evidence from China

被引:3
|
作者
Xu, Hui [1 ]
Liu, Xin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Sch Econ & Business Adm, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China
关键词
Urban environmental regulation; Labor demand; Emission reduction strategies; Drive-out effect; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; AIR; POLLUTION; INVESTMENT; INNOVATION; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2024.09.018
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Air pollution affects people's livelihoods, and China's environmental governance is a defensive battle that must be fought. Combining several comprehensive datasets, this study uncovers the underlying mechanisms of urban environmental regulation that affect labor demand from the perspective of firms' choice of emission reduction strategies. Utilizing a difference-in-differences method, this study finds that on average, the Key City Demarcation Scheme for Air Pollution Prevention and Control (KCDS) has a drive-out effect on employment while improving urban environmental quality, making it difficult to achieve the double-dividend of de-pollution and employment promotion. These conclusions still hold after considering various specification checks, including the instrumental variable method. Underlying mechanisms indicate that manufacturing firms strengthen both front-end productive "changes-in-process" and nonproductive "end-of-pipe" treatment to respond to stricter urban environmental enforcement, and ultimately, KCDS has triggered a drive-out effect on employment. Heterogeneous effects investigate that firms' emission reduction strategies have path dependence and that the drive-out effect on employment is particularly pronounced for large-scale, technology- and capitalintensive domestic firms in large cities. This study provides policy insights for the smooth realization of the urban green transformation while safeguarding the livelihood of society.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 609
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Peer effects of environmental regulation on sulfur dioxide emission intensity: Empirical evidence from China
    Shen, Qiong
    Pan, Yuxi
    Wu, Rui
    Feng, Yanchao
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2023,
  • [42] Environmental regulation and the cost of debt: Evidence from the carbon emission trading system pilot in China
    Ni, Xiaoran
    Jin, Qi
    Huang, Kunhao
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 49
  • [43] Land price regulation and firms' global value chain position: Evidence from China
    Wu, Huaqing
    Wang, Ling
    Peng, Fei
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2024, 85
  • [44] Analysis of the Upgrading Effect of the Industrial Structure of Environmental Regulation: Evidence From 113 Cities in China
    Shao, Wei
    Yin, Yufei
    Bai, Xiao
    Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [45] Does environmental regulation affect capital-labor ratio of manufacturing enterprises: Evidence from China
    Yao, Wenyun
    Zhang, Yi
    Ma, Jingwen
    Cui, Guanghui
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 86
  • [46] Does Environmental Regulation Promote Eco-Innovation Performance of Manufacturing Firms?-Empirical Evidence from China
    Wang, Jieqiong
    Hu, Shichao
    Zhang, Ziyi
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (06)
  • [47] Government support for environmental regulation: Evidence from China
    Fu, Tong
    Yang, Siying
    Jian, Ze
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 83
  • [48] Environmental protection tax and firms' ESG investment: Evidence from China
    Wang, Xiaolin
    Ye, Yingying
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2024, 131
  • [49] Environmental information disclosure and firms? green innovation: Evidence from China
    Ding, Jinxiu
    Lu, Zhe
    Yu, Chin-Hsien
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2022, 81 : 147 - 159
  • [50] Environmental regulation and technological innovation: evidence from China
    William Mbanyele
    Fengrong Wang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 12890 - 12910