Urban environmental regulation, firms' emission reduction strategies and labor demand: Evidence from China

被引:3
|
作者
Xu, Hui [1 ]
Liu, Xin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Sch Econ & Business Adm, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China
关键词
Urban environmental regulation; Labor demand; Emission reduction strategies; Drive-out effect; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; AIR; POLLUTION; INVESTMENT; INNOVATION; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2024.09.018
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Air pollution affects people's livelihoods, and China's environmental governance is a defensive battle that must be fought. Combining several comprehensive datasets, this study uncovers the underlying mechanisms of urban environmental regulation that affect labor demand from the perspective of firms' choice of emission reduction strategies. Utilizing a difference-in-differences method, this study finds that on average, the Key City Demarcation Scheme for Air Pollution Prevention and Control (KCDS) has a drive-out effect on employment while improving urban environmental quality, making it difficult to achieve the double-dividend of de-pollution and employment promotion. These conclusions still hold after considering various specification checks, including the instrumental variable method. Underlying mechanisms indicate that manufacturing firms strengthen both front-end productive "changes-in-process" and nonproductive "end-of-pipe" treatment to respond to stricter urban environmental enforcement, and ultimately, KCDS has triggered a drive-out effect on employment. Heterogeneous effects investigate that firms' emission reduction strategies have path dependence and that the drive-out effect on employment is particularly pronounced for large-scale, technology- and capitalintensive domestic firms in large cities. This study provides policy insights for the smooth realization of the urban green transformation while safeguarding the livelihood of society.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 609
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mandatory Environmental Regulation, Enterprise Labor Demand and Green Innovation Transformation: A Quasi-Experiment from China's New Environmental Protection Law
    Liu, Jiamin
    Ma, Xiaoyu
    Zhao, Bin
    Cui, Qi
    Zhang, Sisi
    Zhang, Jiaoning
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (14)
  • [32] Environmental regulation and OFDI: Evidence from Chinese listed firms
    Liu, Wei
    Zhao, Zhihui
    Wen, Zhao
    Cheng, Shixiong
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2022, 75 : 191 - 208
  • [33] Productivity implications of inefficient environmental regulation: Evidence from China
    Hang, Jing
    Wang, Miaojun
    Zhou, Mohan
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2025, 90
  • [34] Environmental regulation and innovation: Evidence from China
    Yu, Yantuan
    Zhang, Ning
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2022, 76
  • [35] Analyzing the impact of environmental regulation on labor demand: A quasi-experiment from Clean Air Action in China
    Li, Zhensheng
    Lin, Boqiang
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2022, 93
  • [36] Environmental Decentralization, Environmental Regulation and Environmental Pollution: Evidence from China
    Cai, Lingzhi
    Guo, Lei
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2023, 32 (03): : 2053 - 2068
  • [37] Environmental regulation and employment: Evidence from China's new Environmental Protection Law
    Li, Zhuo
    Li, Yuanqi
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2024, 82 : 400 - 416
  • [38] Commercial Bank Expansion and Environmental Pollution: Micro Evidence from Industrial Firms in China
    Li, Shengrui
    Chen, Leyi
    Xu, Pingguo
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2024, 33 (04): : 4195 - 4211
  • [39] Environmental Regulation, Economic Network and Sustainable Growth of Urban Agglomerations in China
    Chong, Zhaohui
    Qin, Chenglin
    Ye, Xinyue
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (05):
  • [40] Does environmental information disclosure regulation improve environmental governance? Evidence from China
    Cheng, Bo
    Mao, Xinyang
    EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2024, 63