共 50 条
Automatic Determination of Endothelial Cell Density From Donor Cornea Endothelial Cell Images
被引:1
|作者:
Benetz, Beth Ann M.
[1
,2
]
Shivade, Ved S.
[3
]
Joseph, Naomi M.
[3
]
Romig, Nathan J.
[3
]
McCormick, John C.
[3
]
Chen, Jiawei
[3
]
Titus, Michael S.
[4
]
Sawant, Onkar B.
[4
,5
]
Clover, Jameson M.
[6
]
Yoganathan, Nathan
[6
]
Menegay, Harry J.
[1
,2
]
O'Brien, Robert C.
[7
]
Wilson, David L.
[3
]
Lass, Jonathan H.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Cleveland, OH USA
[2] Univ Hosp Eye Inst, Cornea Image Anal Reading Ctr, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, 340 Wickendon Bldg,10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Eversight, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Eversight, Ctr Vis & Eye Banking Res, Cleveland, OH USA
[6] VisionGift, Portland, OR USA
[7] Univ Miami, Bascom Palmer Eye Inst, Miami, FL USA
来源:
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
eye banking;
deep learning;
endothelial cells;
SPECULAR-MICROSCOPY;
DIABETIC-RETINOPATHY;
QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS;
AGE;
AGREEMENT;
SP-2000P;
SYSTEM;
D O I:
10.1167/tvst.13.8.40
中图分类号:
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号:
100212 ;
摘要:
Purpose: To determine endothelial cell density (ECD) from real-world donor cornea endothelial cell (EC) images using a self-supervised deep learning segmentation model. Methods: Two eye banks (Eversight, VisionGift) provided 15,138 single, unique EC images from 8169 donors along with their demographics, tissue characteristics, and ECD. This dataset was utilized for self-supervised training and deep learning inference. The Cornea Image Analysis Reading Center (CIARC) provided a second dataset of 174 donor EC images based on image and tissue quality. These images were used to train a supervised deep learning cell border segmentation model. Evaluation between manual and automated determination of ECD was restricted to the 1939 test EC images with at least 100 cells counted by both methods. Results: The ECD measurements from both methods were in excellent agreement with rc c of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.79; P < 0.001) and bias of 123 cells/mm2 2 (95% CI, 114-131; P < 0.001); 81% of the automated ECD values were within 10% of the manual ECD values. When the analysis was further restricted to the cropped image, the rc c was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.87-0.89; P < 0.001), bias was 46 cells/mm2 2 (95% CI, 39-53; P < 0.001), and 93% of the automated ECD values were within 10% of the manual ECD values. Conclusions: Deep learning analysis provides accurate ECDs of donor images, potentially reducing analysis time and training requirements. Translational Relevance: The approach of this study, a robust methodology for automatically evaluating donor cornea EC images, could expand the quantitative determination of endothelial health beyond ECD.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文