Commodity windfalls, political regimes, and environmental quality

被引:1
作者
Oyekola, Olayinka [1 ]
Emediegwu, Lotanna E. [2 ]
Animashaun, Jubril O. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Dept Econ, Exeter EX4 4PU, England
[2] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Dept Finance & Econ, Manchester, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Dept Econ, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, England
关键词
Commodity windfalls; Political regimes; Democracy; Autocracy; Climate change; Environmental quality; CO2; EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; PANEL-DATA; DEMOCRACY; INSTITUTIONS; DEMOCRATIZATION; URBANIZATION; DICTATORSHIP; PRICES; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107813
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Despite concerted global efforts to curb environmental degradation (proxied by greenhouse gas emissions), climate change mitigation policies appear to be failing in reducing carbon emissions, with considerable differences in the levels and rates of emissions across countries. To bridge the gap between the observed national commitments to climate targets and the reality of rising greenhouse gas emissions, this paper examines how the incentives generated by resource endowments and commodity windfalls (proxied by international commodity price booms or fluctuations) are critical for our understanding. Using a significantly larger and more representative international sample than extant research, we document, applying both static and dynamic econometric techniques to a panel of 179 countries during the period 1970-2018, that a rise in commodity windfalls has a positive and significant effect on carbon emissions. We then explore classification of countries into democracies and autocracies as potential channels for the heterogeneous effects of commodity windfalls on environmental quality, finding that a rise in international prices of exported commodities significantly leads to an increase in carbon emissions in democratic countries, with no significant effect on carbon emissions in autocratic countries. These results are robust to various sensitivity checks.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Evolution of Risk and Political Regimes [J].
Petrova, Maria ;
Bates, Robert H. .
ECONOMICS & POLITICS, 2012, 24 (02) :200-225
[12]   The effect of technological innovations, urbanization and economic growth on environmental quality: does governance matter? [J].
Khan, Hayat ;
Khan, Itbar .
FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 11
[13]   Urbanization, democracy, bureaucratic quality, and environmental degradation [J].
Adams, Samuel ;
Klobodu, Edem Kwame Mensah .
JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2017, 39 (06) :1035-1051
[14]   Does democracy really improve environmental quality? Empirical contribution to the environmental politics debate [J].
Acheampong, Alex O. ;
Opoku, Eric Evans Osei ;
Dzator, Janet .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 109
[15]   Influence of Military Expenditures, Industrial Growth, and Financial Development on Economic Growth, and Environment in Heterogeneous Political Regimes in Pakistan [J].
Muhammad, Faqeer ;
Khan, Anwar ;
Hussain, Jamal ;
Baig, Tasawar ;
Baig, Saadia .
JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024, 15 (01) :2439-2459
[16]   Changing Political Regimes and Tropical Deforestation [J].
Kuusela, Olli-Pekka ;
Amacher, Gregory S. .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2016, 64 (03) :445-463
[17]   Economic liberalization, political regimes and ideology [J].
Castro, Vitor ;
Martins, Rodrigo .
KYKLOS, 2021, 74 (04) :463-487
[18]   Logistic and environmental quality [J].
Subramaniam, Yogeeswari .
PRESENT ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 15 (01) :35-48
[19]   Institutional quality and US FDI outflows: Do political regimes matter? [J].
Sinha, Chaitali ;
Saha, Shrabani ;
Vasilev, Aleksandar .
ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, 2024, 48 (03)
[20]   Regimes of the World (RoW): Opening New Avenues for the Comparative Study of Political Regimes [J].
Luhrmann, Anna ;
Tannenberg, Marcus ;
Lindberg, Staffan I. .
POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2018, 6 (01) :60-77