Commodity windfalls, political regimes, and environmental quality

被引:1
|
作者
Oyekola, Olayinka [1 ]
Emediegwu, Lotanna E. [2 ]
Animashaun, Jubril O. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Dept Econ, Exeter EX4 4PU, England
[2] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Dept Finance & Econ, Manchester, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Dept Econ, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, England
关键词
Commodity windfalls; Political regimes; Democracy; Autocracy; Climate change; Environmental quality; CO2; EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; PANEL-DATA; DEMOCRACY; INSTITUTIONS; DEMOCRATIZATION; URBANIZATION; DICTATORSHIP; PRICES; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107813
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Despite concerted global efforts to curb environmental degradation (proxied by greenhouse gas emissions), climate change mitigation policies appear to be failing in reducing carbon emissions, with considerable differences in the levels and rates of emissions across countries. To bridge the gap between the observed national commitments to climate targets and the reality of rising greenhouse gas emissions, this paper examines how the incentives generated by resource endowments and commodity windfalls (proxied by international commodity price booms or fluctuations) are critical for our understanding. Using a significantly larger and more representative international sample than extant research, we document, applying both static and dynamic econometric techniques to a panel of 179 countries during the period 1970-2018, that a rise in commodity windfalls has a positive and significant effect on carbon emissions. We then explore classification of countries into democracies and autocracies as potential channels for the heterogeneous effects of commodity windfalls on environmental quality, finding that a rise in international prices of exported commodities significantly leads to an increase in carbon emissions in democratic countries, with no significant effect on carbon emissions in autocratic countries. These results are robust to various sensitivity checks.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Resource Windfalls, Political Regimes, and Political Stability
    Caselli, Francesco
    Tesei, Andrea
    REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2016, 98 (03) : 573 - 590
  • [2] Linking institutional quality to environmental sustainability
    Jahanger, Atif
    Usman, Muhammad
    Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 30 (06) : 1749 - 1765
  • [3] Effect of climate finance on environmental quality: A global analysis
    Zoungrana, Tibi Didier
    Lompo, Aguima Aime Bernard
    Toe, Daouda Lawa tan
    RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS, 2024, 78 (04)
  • [4] Democracy, information, and communication technology infrastructure and environmental quality
    Liu, Wenjing
    Wang, Jiang
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (48) : 105259 - 105274
  • [5] Elections and Environmental Quality
    Stef, Nicolae
    Ben Jabeur, Sami
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2023, 84 (02) : 593 - 625
  • [6] Towards sustainable development in China: do political rights and civil liberties matter for environmental quality?
    Kocak, Emrah
    Kizilkaya, Oktay
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (28) : 35488 - 35500
  • [7] Instability, political regimes and economic growth. A theoretical framework
    Tohme, Fernando
    Angeles Caraballo, M.
    Dabus, Carlos
    METROECONOMICA, 2022, 73 (01) : 291 - 317
  • [8] Economic Policy Uncertainty, Social Development, Political Regimes and Environmental Quality
    Su, Hang
    Geng, Yong
    Xia, Xi-Qiang
    Wang, Quan-Jing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (04)
  • [9] The Impact of Political Stability on Environmental Quality in the Long Run: The Case of Turkey
    Kirikkaleli, Dervis
    Osmanli, Ayguen
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [10] Political Regimes and Quality of State Functioning: Analysis of Interrelationship
    Lokshin, Ilya
    POLITEIA-JOURNAL OF POLITICAL THEORY POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIOLOGY OF POLITICS, 2011, 63 (04): : 74 - +