Effectiveness of a novel artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy system for adenoma detection: a prospective, propensity score-matched, non-randomized controlled study in Korea

被引:0
作者
Park, Jung-Bin [1 ]
Bae, Jung Ho [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, 39 FL Gangnam Finance Ctr 152 Teheran ro, Seoul 06236, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Healthcare Res Inst, Healthcare Syst Gangnam Ctr, 39 FL Gangnam Finance Ctr 152 Teheran ro, Seoul 06236, South Korea
关键词
Adenoma; Artificial intelligence; Colonoscopy; Polyps; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; COLORECTAL-CANCER; NEOPLASIA; NETWORK; EFFICACY; RATES;
D O I
10.5946/ce.2024.168
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Aims: The real-world effectiveness of computer-aided detection (CADe) systems during colonoscopies remains uncertain. We assessed the effectiveness of the novel CADe system, ENdoscopy as AI-powered Device (ENAD), in enhancing the adenoma detection rate (ADR) and other quality indicators in real-world clinical practice. Methods: We enrolled patients who underwent elective colonoscopies between May 2022 and October 2022 at a tertiary healthcare center. Standard colonoscopy (SC) was compared to ENAD-assisted colonoscopy. Eight experienced endoscopists performed the procedures in randomly assigned CADe- and non-CADe-assisted rooms. The primary outcome was a comparison of ADR between the ENAD and SC groups. Results: A total of 1,758 sex- and age-matched patients were included and evenly distributed into two groups. The ENAD group had a significantly higher ADR (45.1% vs. 38.8%, p=0.010), higher sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR) (5.7% vs. 2.5%, p=0.001), higher mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) (0.78 +/- 1.17 vs. 0.61 +/- 0.99; incidence risk ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.42), and longer withdrawal time (9.0 +/- 3.4 vs. 8.3 +/- 3.1, p<0.001) than the SC group. However, the mean withdrawal times were not significantly different between the two groups in cases where no polyps were detected (6.9 +/- 1.7 vs. 6.7 +/- 1.7, p=0.058). Conclusions: ENAD-assisted colonoscopy significantly improved the ADR, APC, and SSLDR in real-world clinical practice, particularly for smaller and nonpolypoid adenomas.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 120
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Establishing key research questions for the implementation of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy: a modified Delphi method [J].
Ahmad, Omer F. ;
Mori, Yuichi ;
Misawa, Masashi ;
Kudo, Shin-ei ;
Anderson, John T. ;
Bernal, Jorge ;
Berzin, Tyler M. ;
Bisschops, Raf ;
Byrne, Michael F. ;
Chen, Peng-Jen ;
East, James E. ;
Eelbode, Tom ;
Elson, Daniel S. ;
Gurudu, Suryakanth R. ;
Histace, Aymeric ;
Karnes, William E. ;
Repici, Alessandro ;
Singh, Rajvinder ;
Valdastri, Pietro ;
Wallace, Michael B. ;
Wang, Pu ;
Stoyanov, Danail ;
Lovat, Laurence B. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 53 (09) :893-901
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V58, pS3
[3]   Colorectal Cancer Screening-Who, How, and When? [J].
Bevan, Roisin ;
Rutter, Matthew D. .
CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 51 (01) :37-49
[4]  
Corley DA, 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, V370, P1298, DOI [10.1056/NEJMoa1309086, 10.1056/NEJMc1405329]
[5]   Comparative Efficacy of Colonoscope Distal Attachment Devices in Increasing Rates of Adenoma Detection: A Network Meta-analysis [J].
Facciorusso, Antonio ;
Del Prete, Valentina ;
Buccino, Rosario Vincenzo ;
Della Valle, Nicola ;
Nacchiero, Maurizio Cosimo ;
Monica, Fabio ;
Cannizzaro, Renato ;
Muscatiello, Nicola .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 16 (08) :1209-+
[6]   Detecting Deficient Coverage in Colonoscopies [J].
Freedman, Daniel ;
Blau, Yochai ;
Katzir, Liran ;
Aides, Amit ;
Shimshoni, Ilan ;
Veikherman, Danny ;
Golany, Tomer ;
Gordon, Ariel ;
Corrado, Greg ;
Matias, Yossi ;
Rivlin, Ehud .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 39 (11) :3451-3462
[7]   Detection of colorectal adenomas with a real-time computer-aided system (ENDOANGEL): a randomised controlled study [J].
Gong, Dexin ;
Wu, Lianlian ;
Zhang, Jun ;
Mu, Ganggang ;
Shen, Lei ;
Liu, Jun ;
Wang, Zhengqiang ;
Zhou, Wei ;
An, Ping ;
Huang, Xu ;
Jiang, Xiaoda ;
Li, Yanxia ;
Wan, Xinyue ;
Hu, Shan ;
Chen, Yiyun ;
Hu, Xiao ;
Xu, Youming ;
Zhu, Xiaoyun ;
Li, Suqin ;
Yao, Liwen ;
He, Xinqi ;
Chen, Di ;
Huang, Li ;
Wei, Xiao ;
Wang, Xuemei ;
Yu, Honggang .
LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 5 (04) :352-361
[8]   Increased adenoma detection rate with system-wide implementation of a split-dose preparation for colonoscopy [J].
Gurudu, Suryakanth R. ;
Ramirez, Francisco C. ;
Harrison, M. Edwyn ;
Leighton, Jonathan A. ;
Crowell, Michael D. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 76 (03) :603-+
[9]   Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia During Colonoscopy A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Hassan, Cesare ;
Spadaccini, Marco ;
Mori, Yuichi ;
Foroutan, Farid ;
Facciorusso, Antonio ;
Gkolfakis, Paraskevas ;
Tziatzios, Georgios ;
Triantafyllou, Konstantinos ;
Antonelli, Giulio ;
Khalaf, Kareem ;
Rizkala, Tommy ;
Vandvik, Per Olav ;
Fugazza, Alessandro ;
Rondonotti, Emanuele ;
Glissen-Brown, Jeremy R. ;
Kamba, Shunsuke ;
Maida, Marcello ;
Correale, Loredana ;
Bhandari, Pradeep ;
Jover, Rodrigo ;
Sharma, Prateek ;
Rex, Douglas K. ;
Repici, Alessandro .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2023, 176 (09) :1209-+
[10]   Computer-aided detection-assisted colonoscopy: classification and relevance of false positives [J].
Hassan, Cesare ;
Badalamenti, Matteo ;
Maselli, Roberta ;
Correale, Loredana ;
Iannone, Andrea ;
Radaelli, Franco ;
Rondonotti, Emanuele ;
Ferrara, Elisa ;
Spadaccini, Marco ;
Alkandari, Asma ;
Fugazza, Alessandro ;
Anderloni, Andrea ;
Galtieri, Piera Alessia ;
Pellegatta, Gaia ;
Carrara, Silvia ;
Di Leo, Milena ;
Craviotto, Vincenzo ;
Lamonaca, Laura ;
Lorenzetti, Roberto ;
Andrealli, Alida ;
Antonelli, Giulio ;
Wallace, Michael ;
Sharma, Prateek ;
Roesch, Thomas ;
Repici, Alessandro .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 92 (04) :900-+