A card-based design tool for supporting design thinking in elementary students

被引:1
作者
Arvanitakis, Ioannis [1 ]
Palaigeorgiou, George [1 ]
Bratitsis, Tharrenos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Macedonia, Sch Social Sci & Humanities, Florina, Greece
关键词
Design thinking; Design cards; Educational robotics; Robotics competitions; IDEA GENERATION; ROBOTICS; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10798-024-09916-3
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Although educational robotics competitions have become a popular research field in STEAM education, there is a lack of studies concerning the design process that student teams follow to build their solutions. This study aims to propose and evaluate We!Design!ForSTEAM, an approach for supporting design thinking in the context of STEAM and robotics competitions for elementary school students based on a card-based design game. The proposed methodology is derived from participatory design approaches. It is based on 40 design cards, which aim to empower elementary students to empathize with the problem and ideate creatively and efficiently for identifying solutions. It was applied in 6 sessions with the participation of 31 elementary students preparing for an open educational robotics competition. Questionnaires and focus groups were used to gather data from the students who argued that the proposed approach allowed them to explore the problem in an unexpected, creative, and productive way. They managed to identify complex problems and produce innovative solutions utilizing a structured design process with ideation probes. Weaknesses of the framework, primarily focused on time management, were also identified and reported. We suggest that the proposed approach is a first step to creating design thinking methodologies for elementary students in educational robotics and STEAM.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 481
页数:21
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Aksela M., 2019, Lumat: International Journal of Math, Science and Technology Education, V7
[2]  
Alimisis D, 2013, Themes in Science and Technology Education, V6, P63
[3]  
Altin H, 2013, J BALT SCI EDUC, V12, P365
[4]  
Angel-Fernandez J. M., 2018, AUSTR ROB WORKSH 201, V37
[5]  
Angelopoulos P., 2021, HDB RES USING ED ROB, P539
[6]  
Anwar S., 2019, Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), V9, P2, DOI [10.7771/2157-9288.1223, DOI 10.7771/2157-9288.1223]
[7]   Quadruple Thinking: Creative Thinking [J].
Bacanli, Hasan ;
Dombayci, Mehmet Ali ;
Demir, Metin ;
Tarhan, Sinem .
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 2010, 2011, 12 :536-544
[8]  
Buchanan R., 1992, DES ISSUES, V8, P5, DOI [DOI 10.2307/1511637, 10.2307/1511637]
[9]  
Carroll M., 2015, J RES STEM ED, V1, P59, DOI [DOI 10.51355/JSTEM.2015.9, 10.51355/jstem.2015.9]
[10]   Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions [J].
Ceschin, Fabrizio ;
Gaziulusoy, Idil .
DESIGN STUDIES, 2016, 47 :118-163