Energy transition: Cap-and-trade and carbon capture and storage for achieving net-zero emissions with sustainable insurance

被引:0
作者
Chen, Shi [1 ]
Li, Yuqi [1 ]
Lin, Jyh-Horng [2 ]
Chang, Ching-Hui [3 ]
机构
[1] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
[2] Tamkang Univ, Dept Int Business, New Taipei City, Taiwan
[3] Ming Chuan Univ, Dept Accounting, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Cap-and-trade; Carbon capture and storage; Energy transition; Net-zero emissions; Sustainable insurance; LIFE-INSURANCE; RENEWABLE ENERGY; CCS; IMPACT; FRAMEWORK; COSTS; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121902
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper introduces an energy transition model featuring a carbon-intensive manufacturer that adopts sustainable insurance, participates in a cap-and-trade scheme, and implements carbon capture and storage (CCS) transit, all aimed at achieving the net-zero carbon emission target. The model utilizes a down-and-out call (DOC) approach to evaluate the manufacturer's equity, considering the bankruptcy risk prior to maturity due to carbon intensity. The equity of the life insurer providing funds is assessed using a capped DOC method to address the capped credit risk from the manufacturer. The findings reveal that increased adoption of CCS transit diminishes manufacturer equity, heightens default risk, and reduces insurer equity, with these effects exacerbated by advanced CCS technology and stringent cap-and-trade caps. Both stringent cap-and-trade schemes and rapid advancements in CCS transit practices, particularly with the use of advanced CCS technology, deviate from the net-zero target. A critical policy implication is the necessity for the precise calibration of cap-and-trade schemes and the pace of CCS transit adoption to ensure alignment with net-zero targets.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] LIFE-INSURANCE IN A CONTINGENT CLAIM FRAMEWORK - PRICING AND REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS
    BRIYS, E
    DEVARENE, F
    [J]. GENEVA PAPERS ON RISK AND INSURANCE THEORY, 1994, 19 (01): : 53 - 72
  • [2] A barrier option framework for corporate security valuation
    Brockman, P
    Turtle, HJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 67 (03) : 511 - 529
  • [3] Impact of policies on residential multi-energy systems for consumers and prosumers
    Brodnicke, Linda
    Gabrielli, Paolo
    Sansavini, Giovanni
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 344
  • [4] Buchner B., 2019, GLOBAL LANDSCAPE CLI
  • [5] An assessment of CCS costs, barriers and potential
    Budinis, Sara
    Krevor, Samuel
    Mac Dowell, Niall
    Brandon, Nigel
    Hawkes, Adam
    [J]. ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2018, 22 : 61 - 81
  • [6] Delivering carbon negative electricity, heat and hydrogen with BECCS - Comparing the options
    Bui, Mai
    Zhang, Di
    Fajardy, Mathilde
    Dowell, Niall Mac
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (29) : 15298 - 15321
  • [7] Bui M, 2018, ENERG ENVIRON SCI, V11, P1062, DOI [10.1039/c7ee02342a, 10.1039/C7EE02342A]
  • [8] Green technology choices under the cap-and-trade mechanism with insurer green finance in a dragon-king environment
    Chen, Shi
    Huang, Fu-Wei
    Lin, Jyh-Horng
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 117
  • [9] Financing carbon lock-in in developing countries: Bilateral financing for power generation technologies from China, Japan, and the United States
    Chen, Xu
    Li, Zhongshu
    Gallagher, Kevin P.
    Mauzerall, Denise L.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2021, 300
  • [10] The value of low- and negative-carbon fuels in the transition to net-zero emission economies: Lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions and cost assessments across multiple fuel types
    Cheng, Fangwei
    Luo, Hongxi
    Jenkins, Jesse D.
    Larson, Eric D.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 331