Adenoma Detection Rate after Positive Stool-Based Screening in a U.S. Population

被引:0
|
作者
Delungahawatta, Thilini [1 ]
Hum, Richard [2 ]
Woo, Stephanie M. [3 ]
Loughney, Thomas [3 ]
Jennings, Joseph [3 ]
机构
[1] MedStar Union Mem Hosp, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Washington, DC USA
[3] MedStar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Washington, DC USA
关键词
adenoma detection rate; colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; colorectal neoplasms; stool-based screening; SOCIETY TASK-FORCE; COLORECTAL-CANCER; QUALITY INDICATORS; COLONOSCOPY; RECOMMENDATIONS; RISK;
D O I
10.1055/s-0044-1789011
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction and Objectives Over the past two decades, advancements in screening programs have led to a decrease in the incidence and mortality rates of colorectal cancer. The recommended benchmark for primary screening colonoscopy adenoma detection rate (ADR) is 25%. However, recent research supports higher ADR benchmarks following positive stool testing. Findings from a Dutch screening program have suggested higher ADRs in fecal immunochemical test positive patients with an inverse relationship with interval cancer development. Our study aims to assess ADRs in a U.S. patient population with positive stool screenings and investigate any correlation to occurrences of interval cancers. Materials and Methods Data from all positive stool-based screening participants who subsequently underwent colonoscopy at a tertiary care center between 2017 and 2021 were collected. A retrospective chart review was performed to determine the ADR and interval colon cancers. Results From a total of 120 patients (32 fecal occult blood test [FOBT] positive patients, 43 fecal immunochemical test [FIT] positive patients, 45 FIT-DNA-positive patients), the average ADR was 35%. Nonadvanced polyps were the most identified adenomas at 78.6%. No interval colorectal cancer cases were identified. There was a clear difference in ADR between stool-testing methods, with FIT-DNA showing higher ADRs than FIT and FOBT. Conclusion Endoscopists should recognize the importance of higher ADR targets in colonoscopies conducted after positive stool-based screening as a means to maintain high-quality colonoscopy standards.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 173
页数:5
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Variations in Screening Adenoma Detection Rate by Specialty of Physicians in a Predominately African American Population
    Kundumadam, Shanker
    Nasser, Maliha
    Kaloti, Zaid
    Kiwan, Wissam
    Kathi, Pradeep R.
    Nas, Hala
    Naylor, Paul H.
    Al-Subee, Omar
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (10)
  • [2] Correlation between adenoma detection rate and polyp detection rate at endoscopy in a non-screening population
    Murphy, B.
    Myers, E.
    O'Shea, T.
    Feeley, K.
    Waldron, B.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [3] Adenoma detection rate is enough to assess endoscopist performance: a population-based observational study of FIT-positive colonoscopies
    Denis, Bernard
    Gendre, Isabelle
    Tuzin, Nicolas
    Murris, Juliette
    Guignard, Anne
    Perrin, Philippe
    Rahmi, Gabriel
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2022, 10 (09) : E1208 - E1217
  • [4] Life-years gained resulting from screening colonoscopy compared with follow-up colonoscopy after a positive stool-based colorectal screening test
    Fendrick, A. Mark
    Borah, Bijan J.
    Ozbay, A. Burak
    Saoud, Leila
    Limburg, Paul J.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2022, 26
  • [5] Novel multiplex stool-based assay for the detection of early-stage colon cancer in a Chinese population
    Jiang, Hui-Hong
    Xing, Si-Wei
    Tang, Xuan
    Chen, Ying
    Lin, Kang
    He, Lu-Wei
    Lin, Mou-Bin
    Tang, Er-Jiang
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 28 (24) : 2705 - 2720
  • [6] Interval Advanced Adenomas and Neoplasia in Patients with Negative Colonoscopy Following Positive Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Test
    Liu, Kyle S.
    George, Rollin
    Shin, Caleb
    Xiong, Jia Q.
    Jamali, Taher
    Liu, Yan
    Roy, Priya
    Singh, Sonia
    Ma, Samuel
    El-Serag, Hashem B.
    Tan, Mimi C.
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2025, 70 (01) : 350 - 359
  • [7] Cost-Effectiveness of Outreach Strategies for Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Medicaid Population
    Karlitz, Jordan J.
    Fendrick, A. Mark
    Bhatt, Jay
    Coronado, Gloria D.
    Jeyakumar, Sushanth
    Smith, Nathaniel J.
    Plescia, Marcus
    Brooks, Durado
    Limburg, Paul
    Lieberman, David
    POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2022, 25 (03) : 343 - 351
  • [8] A novel panel of stool-based DNA biomarkers for early screening of colorectal neoplasms in a Chinese population
    Sun, Minghao
    Liu, Jie
    Hu, Hao
    Guo, Peng
    Shan, Zhili
    Yang, Hengying
    Wang, Junyi
    Xiao, Wen
    Zhou, Xiaojun
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 145 (10) : 2423 - 2432
  • [9] Real-world cost-effectiveness of stool-based colorectal cancer screening in a Medicare population
    Fisher, Deborah A.
    Karlitz, Jordan J.
    Jeyakumar, Sushanth
    Smith, Nathaniel
    Limburg, Paul
    Lieberman, David
    Fendrick, A. Mark
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 24 (01) : 654 - 664
  • [10] Patterns of initial colorectal cancer screenings after turning 50 years old and follow-up rates of colonoscopy after positive stool-based testing among the average-risk population
    Austin, George
    Kowalkowski, Henrik
    Guo, Yinglong
    Miller-Wilson, Lesley-Ann
    Byfield, Stacey DaCosta
    Verma, Prat
    Housman, Laura
    Berke, Ethan
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2023, 39 (01) : 47 - 61