Understanding patients' perspectives of clinical communication within a Major Trauma Centre

被引:0
作者
Tanti, Ruth [1 ]
Cunningham, Roisin [2 ]
Fisher, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Liverpool, England
[2] Liverpool Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Liverpool, England
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2024年 / 55卷 / 09期
关键词
Major trauma; Major trauma centre; Patient-staff clinical communication; Qualitative interviews; INJURY; VALIDITY; CARE; EXPERIENCES; DEPRESSION; CHALLENGE; ADMISSION; DISTRESS; FEELINGS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2024.111563
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Clinical communication between major trauma patients (MTP) and healthcare professionals is extremely complex. Multiple demands are placed on specialist multi-disciplinary teams (MDT) and patients in all stages of treatment. Patient-staff clinical communication has an integral role in MTP healthcare experiences, supporting them with a range of physical and psychological difficulties post-injury. This study aimed to understand MTP perspectives of clinical communication within a MTC through qualitative semi-structured interviews. Twenty participants were purposively sampled from an outpatient follow-up clinic and interviews were analysed using a pluralistic qualitative approach. Three themes were conceptualised from the data; "Challenges to speaking up" "Conversations left me feeling" and "Strategies need to be clinical but tailored". Patients often found it challenging to speak up due to feelings of vulnerability, confusion, and challenges navigating medical terminology. Patients spoke of not wanting to burden staff and family members playing a role in patient-staff communication, but these challenges require further exploration. Patients highlighted the positive (feel reassured, cared for, and human again) and negative (feeling like an object, angry, confused, and dependent) emotional impact of staff communication. Patients also described the benefits of being provided with written information, clear explanations of injuries and person-centred communication. MTP require multiple options to communicate and address psychological difficulties. Greater training on the emotional impact of conversations, skills to respond to psychological distress and communication guidance for staff, is needed to improve clinical communication with MTP.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2016, Major trauma services: service delivery for major trauma
  • [2] Bao HL, 2018, ASIA COMMUN PHOTON
  • [3] Beaton A, 2019, NEW ZEAL MED J, V132, P15
  • [4] Providing effective trauma care: the potential for service provider views to enhance the quality of care (qualitative study nested within a multicentre longitudinal quantitative study)
    Beckett, Kate
    Earthy, Sarah
    Sleney, Jude
    Barnes, Jo
    Kellezi, Blerina
    Barker, Marcus
    Clarkson, Julie
    Coffey, Frank
    Elder, Georgina
    Kendrick, Denise
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (07):
  • [5] Bowlby J., 1982, ATTACHMENT LOSS VOL, V1
  • [6] Patient-identified information and communication needs in the context of major trauma
    Braaf, Sandra
    Ameratunga, Shanthi
    Nunn, Andrew
    Christie, Nicola
    Teague, Warwick
    Judson, Rodney
    Gabbe, Belinda J.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [7] Episodic Memory, Perceptual Memory, and Their Interaction: Foundations for a Theory of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
    Brewin, Chris R.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2014, 140 (01) : 69 - 97
  • [8] Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: The Kalamazoo consensus statement
    Brunett, PH
    Campbell, TL
    Cole-Kelly, K
    Danoff, D
    Frymier, R
    Goldstein, MG
    Gordon, GH
    Klass, DJ
    Kurtz, S
    Laidlaw, J
    Lang, F
    MacLellan, AM
    Makoul, G
    Miller, S
    Novack, D
    Rider, EA
    Simon, FA
    Sluyter, D
    Swing, S
    Weston, W
    Whelan, GP
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2001, 76 (04) : 390 - 393
  • [9] Qualitative evidence synthesis to improve implementation of clinical guidelines
    Carroll, Christopher
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 356
  • [10] Dignity in the terminally ill: a cross-sectional, cohort study
    Chochinov, HM
    Hack, T
    Hassard, T
    Kristjanson, LJ
    McClement, S
    Harlos, M
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 360 (9350) : 2026 - 2030