Confronting variability with uncertainty in the ecotoxicological impact assessment of down-the-drain products

被引:17
作者
Douziech, Melanie [1 ]
Oldenkamp, Rik [1 ,2 ]
van Zelm, Rosalie [1 ]
King, Henry [3 ]
Hendriks, A. Jan [1 ]
Ficheux, Anne-Sophie [4 ,5 ]
Huijbregts, Mark A. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Water & Wetland Res, Dept Environm Sci, POB 9010, NL-6500 GL Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ York, Environm Dept, York, N Yorkshire, England
[3] Unilever, Safety & Environm Assurance Ctr, Colworth Sci Pk, Sharnbrook MK441LQ, Beds, England
[4] Univ Europeenne Bretagne, Lab Evaluat Risque Chim Consommateur LERCCo, 6 Av Victor Le Gorgeu,CS93837, F-29238 Brest 3, France
[5] Univ Bretagne Occidentale UEB UBO, UFR Sci & Tech, 6 Av Victor Le Gorgeu,CS93837, F-29238 Brest 3, France
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Ecotoxicity; Shampoo; Environmental impact; Monte Carlo; QSAR; Parameter uncertainty; FRESH-WATER ECOTOXICITY; IMPROVING SUBSTANCE INFORMATION; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; PART; MODEL; TOXICITY; CHEMICALS; FATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.080
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The use of down-the-drain products and the resultant release of chemicals may lead to pressures on the freshwater environment. Ecotoxicological impact assessment is a commonly used approach to assess chemical products but is still influenced by several uncertainty and variability sources. As a result, the robustness and reliability of such assessments can be questioned. A comprehensive and systematic assessment of these sources is, therefore, needed to increase their utility and credibility. In this study, we present a method to systematically analyse the uncertainty and variability of the potential ecotoxicological impact (PEI) of chemicals using a portfolio of 54 shampoo products. We separately quantified the influence of the statistical uncertainty in the prediction of physicochemical properties and freshwater toxicity as predicted from Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships (QSPRs) and Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSARs) respectively, and of various sources of spatial and technological variability as well as variability in consumer habits via 2D Monte Carlo simulations. Overall, the variation in the PEIs of shampoo use was mainly the result of uncertainty due to the use of toxicity data from three species only. All uncertainty sources combined resulted in PEIs ranging on average over seven orders of magnitude (ratio of the 90th to the 10th percentile) so that an absolute quantification of the ecological risk would not be meaningful. In comparison, variation in shampoo composition was the most influential source of variability, although less than compared to uncertainty, leading to PEIs ranging over three orders of magnitude. Increasing the number of toxicity data by increasing the number of species, either through additional measurements or ecotoxicological modelling (e.g. using Interspecies Correlation Equations), should get priority to improve the reliability of PEIs. These conclusions are not limited to shampoos but are applicable more generally to the down-the-drain products since they all have similar data limitations and associated uncertainties relating to the availability of ecotoxicity data and variability in consumer habits and use.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 45
页数:9
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, SUST DEV GOAL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, OP TOX ASS CHEM MIXT
[3]   Estimating biodegradation half-lives for use in chemical screening [J].
Aronson, Dallas ;
Boethling, Robert ;
Howard, Philip ;
Stiteler, William .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2006, 63 (11) :1953-1960
[4]   Assessing the Importance of Spatial Variability versus Model Choices in Life Cycle Impact Assessment: The Case of Freshwater Eutrophication in Europe [J].
Azevedo, Ligia B. ;
Henderson, Andrew D. ;
van Zelm, Rosalie ;
Jolliet, Olivier ;
Huijbregts, Mark A. J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (23) :13565-13570
[5]   Chemical Footprint Method for Improved Communication of Freshwater Ecotoxicity Impacts in the Context of Ecological Limits [J].
Bjorn, Anders ;
Diamond, Miriam ;
Birkved, Morten ;
Hauschild, Michael Zwicky .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (22) :13253-13262
[6]   A review of personal care products in the aquatic environment: Environmental concentrations and toxicity [J].
Brausch, John M. ;
Rand, Gary M. .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2011, 82 (11) :1518-1532
[7]   Pharmaceuticals, Personal Care Products and Endocrine Disrupting Agents in the Environment - A Review [J].
Caliman, Florentina Anca ;
Gavrilescu, Maria .
CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER, 2009, 37 (4-5) :277-303
[8]   High-throughput exposure modeling to support prioritization of chemicals in personal care products [J].
Csiszar, Susan A. ;
Ernstoff, Alexi S. ;
Fantke, Peter ;
Meyer, David E. ;
Jolliet, Olivier .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2016, 163 :490-498
[9]  
Dewaele J., 2006, Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of
[10]   Estimation of chemical emissions from down-the-drain consumer products using consumer survey data at a country and wastewater treatment plant level [J].
Douziech, Melanie ;
van Zelm, Rosalie ;
Oldenkamp, Rik ;
Franco, Antonio ;
Hendriks, A. Jan ;
King, Henry ;
Huijbregts, Mark A. J. .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2018, 193 :32-41