Evaluating the Reliability and Model Fit of the 13-Item and 10-Item Big Five Inventory (Malay Version) among Malaysian Firefighters

被引:0
作者
Azis, Huwaida A. Bdul [1 ]
Rahman, Zairina A. [1 ]
Rashid, Mohd Radzniwan A. [1 ]
Baharom, Nizam [1 ]
Awang, Hamidin [1 ]
Lukman, Nur Hafizah Mohammad [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sains Islam Malaysia, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Bandar Baru Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
[2] Fire & Rescue Dept Malaysia, Planning & Res Div, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
来源
MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES | 2024年 / 31卷 / 04期
关键词
Big Five Inventory; personality traits; firefighters; reliability test; confirmatory factor analysis; PERSONALITY-TRAITS; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.21315/mjms2024.31.4.15
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Lengthy instruments for assessing personality traits may not be applicable in certain research settings. In situations where time is scarce, a briefer measurement is preferable. However, the reliability of a briefer measurement of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) among firefighters in Malaysia has not been reported. This study aimed to investigate the reliability and model fit of the Malay version of the BFI with 13 items (BFI-13) and 10 items (BFI-10) among Methods: A cross-sectional study using cluster sampling was conducted in a state in Malaysia. Each respondent completed BFI-10 and BFI-13 using an online survey with a 1-month interval between each response. Reliability testing was evaluated using internal consistency and a 2-week interval test-retest. The model fit of these two BFI questionnaires was evaluated via Results: A total of 124 firefighters participated in the study, with a zero-dropout rate. The Malay version of BFI-13 exhibited higher reliability by displaying good internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha of 0.919, 0.838, 0.871 and 0.896 for the domains conscientiousness, neuroticism, agreeableness and extraversion, respectively, and acceptable test-retest reliability with moderate to good intraclass correlation (0.588-0.806). The CFA model also indicated that BFI-13 has a better model fit (comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.993; Tucker-Lewis index [TLI] = 0.991; standardised root mean squared residual [SRMR] = 0.029; root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.035). Conclusion: The Malay version of BFI-13 is reliable and applicable enough to be supplementarily used in surveys among Malaysian firefighters. By using a brief personality assessment, it will reduce the cognitive and emotional burden on respondents.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 194
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Universiti Sains Malaysia Emotional Quotient Inventory Among Medical Students in Malaysia
    Arifin, Wan Nor
    Yusoff, Muhamad Saiful Bahri
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2016, 6 (02):
  • [2] The Healthy Personality From a Basic Trait Perspective
    Bleidorn, Wiebke
    Hopwood, Christopher J.
    Ackerman, Robert A.
    Witt, Edward A.
    Kandler, Christian
    Riemann, Rainer
    Samuel, Douglas B.
    Donnellan, M. Brent
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 118 (06) : 1207 - 1225
  • [3] Cross-cultural adaptation, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and feasibility of the German version of the evidence-based practice inventory
    Braun, Tobias
    Ehrenbrusthoff, Katja
    Bahns, Carolin
    Happe, Lisa
    Kopkow, Christian
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [4] Byrne B, 2010, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF PSYCHOLOGY IN EDUCATION, P3
  • [5] Costa P. T., 2008, The revised neo personality inventory (neo-pi-r), V2, P179, DOI [DOI 10.4135/9781849200479.N9, 10.4135/9781849200479.n9, 10.4135/9781849200479.N9]
  • [6] Validation of the French version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory
    Courtois, R.
    Petot, J-M
    Plaisant, O.
    Allibe, B.
    Lignier, B.
    Reveillere, C.
    Lecocq, G.
    John, O.
    [J]. ENCEPHALE-REVUE DE PSYCHIATRIE CLINIQUE BIOLOGIQUE ET THERAPEUTIQUE, 2020, 46 (06): : 455 - 462
  • [7] Fan Yi, 2016, Ecological Processes, V5, P19
  • [8] Giannoulis C, 2020, Three myths and truths about model fit in confirmatory factor analysis
  • [9] Goldberg L. R., 1992, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT, V4, P26, DOI [DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26, https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26]
  • [10] The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures
    Goldberg, LR
    Johnson, JA
    Eber, HW
    Hogan, R
    Ashton, MC
    Cloninger, CR
    Gough, HG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2006, 40 (01) : 84 - 96