DNA methylation analysis reveals local changes in resistant and susceptible soybean lines in response to Phytophthora sansomeana

被引:0
作者
Dibiase, Charlotte N. [1 ]
Cheng, Xi [2 ,3 ]
Lee, Gwonjin [3 ]
Moore, Richard C. [1 ]
Mccoy, Austin G. [4 ]
Chilvers, Martin I. [4 ]
Sun, Lianjun [5 ]
Wang, Dechun [4 ]
Lin, Feng [4 ,6 ]
Zhao, Meixia [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Dept Biol, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Plant Mol & Cellular Biol Grad Program, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Microbiol & Cell Sci, 1355 Museum Dr, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[4] Michigan State Univ, Dept Plant Soil & Microbial Sci, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[5] China Agr Univ, Coll Agron & Biotechnol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Missouri, Fisher Delta Res Extens & Educ Ctr, Div Plant Sci & Technol, Portageville, MO 63873 USA
来源
G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 10期
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DNA methylation; differentially methylated regions; Phytophthora sansomeana; soybean; epigenetic responses; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; EPIGENETIC PATHWAY; GENE; DEMETHYLATION; EVOLUTION; EFFECTORS; SEEDLINGS; PATTERNS; PTI; ETI;
D O I
10.1093/g3journal/jkae191
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Phytophthora sansomeana is an emerging oomycete pathogen causing root rot in many agricultural species including soybean. However, as of now, only one potential resistance gene has been identified in soybean, and our understanding of how genetic and epigenetic regulation in soybean contributes to responses against this pathogen remains largely unknown. In this study, we performed whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) on two soybean lines, Colfax (resistant) and Williams 82 (susceptible), in response to P. sansomeana at two time points: 4 and 16 hours post-inoculation to compare their methylation changes. Our findings revealed that there were no significant changes in genome-wide CG, CHG (H = A, T, or C), and CHH methylation. However, we observed local methylation changes, specially an increase in CHH methylation around genes and transposable elements (TEs) after inoculation, which occurred earlier in the susceptible line and later in the resistant line. After inoculation, we identified differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in both Colfax and Williams 82, with a predominant presence in TEs. Notably, our data also indicated that more TEs exhibited changes in their methylomes in the susceptible line compared to the resistant line. Furthermore, we discovered 837 DMRs within or flanking 772 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in Colfax and 166 DMRs within or flanking 138 DEGs in Williams 82. These DEGs had diverse functions, with Colfax primarily showing involvement in metabolic process, defense response, plant and pathogen interaction, anion and nucleotide binding, and catalytic activity, while Williams 82 exhibited a significant association with photosynthesis. These findings suggest distinct molecular responses to P. sansomeana infection in the resistant and susceptible soybean lines.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] Cuerda-Gil D, 2016, NAT PLANTS, V2, DOI [10.1038/nplants.2016.163, 10.1038/NPLANTS.2016.163]
  • [2] Nine things to know about elicitins
    Derevnina, Lida
    Dagdas, Yasin F.
    De la Concepcion, Juan Carlos
    Bialas, Aleksandra
    Kellner, Ronny
    Petre, Benjamin
    Domazakis, Emmanouil
    Du, Juan
    Wu, Chih-Hang
    Lin, Xiao
    Aguilera-Galvez, Carolina
    Cruz-Mireles, Neftaly
    Vleeshouwers, Vivianne G. A. A.
    Kamoun, Sophien
    [J]. NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2016, 212 (04) : 888 - 895
  • [3] Competition between DNA methylation and transcription factors determines binding of NRF1
    Domcke, Silvia
    Bardet, Anais Flore
    Ginno, Paul Adrian
    Hartl, Dominik
    Burger, Lukas
    Schuebeler, Dirk
    [J]. NATURE, 2015, 528 (7583) : 575 - +
  • [4] Dorrance A.E., 2008, Plant Health Prog, DOI [10.1094/PHP-2008-0118-01-DG, DOI 10.1094/PHP-2008-0118-01-DG, 10.1094/PHP-2008-0118-01-DG.]
  • [5] Widespread dynamic DNA methylation in response to biotic stress
    Dowen, Robert H.
    Pelizzola, Mattia
    Schmitz, Robert J.
    Lister, Ryan
    Dowen, Jill M.
    Nery, Joseph R.
    Dixon, Jack E.
    Ecker, Joseph R.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (32) : E2183 - E2191
  • [6] RNA-directed DNA Methylation
    Erdmann, Robert M.
    Picard, Colette L.
    [J]. PLOS GENETICS, 2020, 16 (10):
  • [7] Phased, Secondary, Small Interfering RNAs in Posttranscriptional Regulatory Networks
    Fei, Qili
    Xia, Rui
    Meyers, Blake C.
    [J]. PLANT CELL, 2013, 25 (07) : 2400 - 2415
  • [8] DNA methylation dynamics during the interaction of wheat progenitor Aegilops tauschii with the obligate biotrophic fungus Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici
    Geng, Shuaifeng
    Kong, Xingchen
    Song, Gaoyuan
    Jia, Meiling
    Guan, Jiantao
    Wang, Fang
    Qin, Zhengrui
    Wu, Liang
    Lan, Xiujin
    Li, Aili
    Mao, Long
    [J]. NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2019, 221 (02) : 1023 - 1035
  • [9] CHH islands: de novo DNA methylation in near-gene chromatin regulation in maize
    Gent, Jonathan I.
    Ellis, Nathanael A.
    Guo, Lin
    Harkess, Alex E.
    Yao, Yingyin
    Zhang, Xiaoyu
    Dawe, R. Kelly
    [J]. GENOME RESEARCH, 2013, 23 (04) : 628 - 637
  • [10] Guo W., 2022, BIO-PROTOCOL, DOI [10.21769/p1516, DOI 10.21769/P1516]